XHLF ranks 7th and SBIL 20th of 78 funds in the Cash & Ultra-Short Income Category.
SBIL vs XHLF
XHLF −0.12pt a year
0.15%0.03%
SBIL 1.4×the volume
432K304K
SBIL vs XHLF Performance
+3.7%+3.6%
- SBIL 0.15%
- XHLF 0.03%, better
- SBIL $4.11B
- XHLF $2.03B
- SBIL +3.7%, better
- XHLF +3.6%
- SBIL 3.63%
- XHLF 3.68%, better
- SBIL 174
- XHLF 29
- SBIL 432K sh, better
- XHLF 304K sh
- SBIL $100.12
- XHLF $50.14
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | SBIL | XHLF |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | B66 | A99Higher |
| Mission | A100 | A100 |
| Risk | C49Higher | C44 |
| Tradability | A81Higher | A78 |
| Holdings | C49Higher | D32 |
| Durability | B63Higher | B59 |
Rank among Cash & Ultra-Short Income funds
Same Category. SBIL and XHLF are both graded against the same 78 Cash & Ultra-Short Income funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
SBILA
XHLFA
In short
SBIL Money market discipline in an ETF wrapper: government cash instruments, current income, stability of principal, all for 0.15% a year with monthly payouts.
XHLF Most cash-parking funds pick a maturity bucket. XHLF picks a number: it blends Treasury bills to an average duration of about six months, resets to that target monthly, and charges three basis points to do it.
Stated mandate
SBIL The fund seeks current income while maintaining liquidity and stability of principal.
XHLF The Fund seeks to track the investment results of an index composed of U.S. Treasury securities.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
SBIL vs XHLF Holdings
How SBIL and XHLF differ
Two bond funds rarely hold the same issues.
Level by level
Sector
No Sector split for SBIL and XHLF.
Country, concentration and asset class
Country
| Country | More in SBILMore in XHLF | Gap | SBIL | XHLF |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| United States | Same weight | 100.0% | 100.0% |
Concentration
- SBIL28.9%
- XHLF79.3%
- SBIL169
- XHLF29
Asset class
- SBIL
- Fixed Income
- XHLF
- Fixed Income
Holdings
Two bond funds rarely hold the same issues, so this page lists no shared Holdings. SBIL holds 169 securities, XHLF 29.
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
SBIL vs XHLF Cost
Overpaying SBIL vs XHLF
$2,499
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
SBIL 0.15%
$3,137
XHLF 0.03%
$638
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | SBIL | XHLF | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $274 | $55 | $219 |
| 20 | $1,071 | $216 | $855 |
| 30 | $3,137 | $638 | $2,499 |
- 0.15%SBIL
- 0.03%XHLF, cheaper
- Middle half of Cash & Ultra-Short Income funds
- Median 0.18%
XHLF cheapest of 78 funds
SBIL 23rd cheapest of 78 funds
SBIL vs XHLF Dividends
- SBIL 3.63%
- XHLF 3.68%, better
- SBIL $3.63
- XHLF $1.85
- SBIL $0.32
- XHLF $0.16
- SBIL Oct 27, 2026
- XHLF Nov 2, 2026
- SBIL Oct 30, 2026
- XHLF Pays Nov 5, 2026
- SBIL Monthly
- XHLF Monthly
Distribution history
SBIL vs XHLF Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- SBIL 0.1%XHLF 0.3%
- Return per unit of risk
- SBIL −1.02XHLF −0.50
- Worst fall
- SBIL −0.03%XHLF −0.1%
- Market sensitivity
- SBIL 0.002XHLF 0.03
Popular comparisons
- 0.15% · 0.08%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.03% · 0.09%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.15% · 0.07%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.03% · 0.08%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.15% · 0.06%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.03% · 0.07%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.