TACU ranks 9th and SECT 56th of 121 funds in the US Active Equity Category.
SECT vs TACU
TACU −0.69pt a year
0.69%0.00%
SECT 28.2×the volume
117K4.15K
SECT vs TACU Performance
+10.0%+11.2%
- SECT 0.69%
- TACU 0.00%, better
- SECT $2.86B
- TACU $17M
- SECT +10.4%
- TACU
- SECT 0.70%
- TACU
- SECT 11
- TACU 411
- SECT 117K sh, better
- TACU 4.15K sh
- SECT $70.54
- TACU $27.68
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | SECT | TACU |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | C47 | A99Higher |
| Mission | A81 | |
| Risk | C40 | B69Higher |
| Tradability | A82Higher | C49 |
| Holdings | D28 | A83Higher |
| Durability | A85Higher | C43 |
Rank among US Active Equity funds
Same Category. SECT and TACU are both graded against the same 121 US Active Equity funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
SECTC
TACUA
In short
SECT Rather than picking stocks, SECT rents whole sectors through sector ETFs, tilting toward the ones its managers judge undervalued. The stated aim: outperform the S&P 500 in rising markets while limiting losses when markets decline.
TACU T. Rowe Price's quant-plus-fundamental take on core large-cap U.S. stock, benchmarked to the Russell 1000. Gross fee 0.14%, fully waived to zero through January 30, 2027.
Stated mandate
SECT The Fund seeks to outperform the S&P 500 during rising markets while limiting losses when markets decline.
TACU The fund seeks long-term capital growth through a primarily U.S. equity portfolio. It combines quantitative models with fundamental, bottom-up analysis and seeks excess returns relative to the Russell 1000 Index.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
SECT vs TACU Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
SECT vs TACU Cost
Overpaying SECT vs TACU
$13,429
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
SECT 0.69%
$13,429
TACU 0.00%
$0
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | SECT | TACU | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $1,232 | $0 | $1,232 |
| 20 | $4,697 | $0 | $4,697 |
| 30 | $13,429 | $0 | $13,429 |
- 0.69%SECT
- 0.00%TACU, cheaper
- Middle half of US Active Equity funds
- Median 0.68%
TACU cheapest of 121 funds
SECT 62nd cheapest of 121 funds
SECT vs TACU Dividends
- SECT 0.70%
- TACU
- SECT $0.49
- TACU None
- SECT $0.08
- TACU
- SECT Sep 24, 2026
- TACU
- SECT Sep 29, 2026
- TACU
- SECT Quarterly
- TACU
Distribution history
SECT vs TACU Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- SECT 13.6%TACU
- Return per unit of risk
- SECT 1.13TACU
- Worst fall
- SECT −21.7%TACU
- Market sensitivity
- SECT 0.97TACU 0.96
SECT and TACU in the news
Popular comparisons
- 0.69% · 0.15%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.00% · 0.15%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.69% · 0.12%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.00% · 0.12%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.69% · 0.17%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.00% · 0.17%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
