Skip to content

SEPT vs ZALT

AllianzIM U.S. Equity Buffer10 Sep ETF

SEPTBCboe

Innovator U.S. Equity 10 Buffer ETF - Quarterly

ZALTACboe

Overlap

Expense ratio

ZALT −0.05pt a year

SEPT0.74%ZALT0.69%

Avg volume · 30D

ZALT 34.3×the volume

SEPT4.03KZALT138K

3Y return · a year

SEPT +6.3pt

SEPT+16.9%ZALT+10.6%

SEPT vs ZALT Performance

Oct 31, 2025 – Oct 30, 2026

+9.9%SEPT+7.1%ZALT

Oct 31, 2025 to Oct 30, 2026. SEPT +9.9%. ZALT +7.1%. Use the arrow keys to read each point.−2.5%0%2.5%5%12.5%Oct 2025Apr 2026Oct 2026
Expense ratio
SEPT 0.74%
ZALT 0.69%, better
Fund size
SEPT $38M
ZALT $840M
1Y total return
SEPT +9.9%, better
ZALT +7.1%
Holdings
SEPT 2
ZALT 503
Avg volume (30D)
SEPT 4.03K sh
ZALT 138K sh, better
NAV per share
SEPT $38.66
ZALT $34.50
52W range

ETF.net Grade

SEPT: Cost 68, Risk 60, Mission not scored, Tradability 38, Holdings 58, Durability 33. ZALT: Cost 82, Risk 79, Mission 80, Tradability 65, Holdings 90, Durability 61.
Pillar letters and Scores for SEPT, ZALT, with each pillar’s weight
PillarSEPTZALT
Cost30% weightB68A82Higher
Mission25% weightNot scoredA80
Risk15% weightB60A79Higher
Tradability15% weightD38B65Higher
Holdings10% weightB58A90Higher
Durability5% weightD33B61Higher

Rank among S&P 500 Buffer 9-12% funds

Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

Same Category. SEPT and ZALT are both graded against the same 77 S&P 500 Buffer 9-12% funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

S&P 500 Buffer 9-12%⁠

Category · 77 funds
See all 77 ›

ZALT ranks 1st and SEPT 23rd of 77 funds in the S&P 500 Buffer 9-12% Category.

  1. Rank 1AZALTInnovator U.S. Equity 10 Buffer ETF - QuarterlyScore 77
  2. Rank 2BAUGPPGIM S&P 500 Buffer 12 ETF - AugustScore 67
  3. Rank 23BPJUNInnovator U.S. Equity Power Buffer ETF - JuneScore 56
  4. Rank 23BSEPTAllianzIM U.S. Equity Buffer10 Sep ETFScore 56
  5. Rank 23BSIXZAllianzIM U.S. Equity 6 Month Buffer10 May/Nov ETFScore 56

Our read on each fund

ETF.net Research

SEPTBAllianzIM U.S. Equity Buffer10 Sep ETF

ZALTAInnovator U.S. Equity 10 Buffer ETF - Quarterly

In short

SEPT The September link in AllianzIM's buffer chain: FLEX options on the SPDR S&P 500 ETF that absorb the first 10% of a year's losses in exchange for a capped upside, with terms reset every September 1. Priced below the buffer-fund median.

ZALT The defined-outcome trade on a three-month clock: ZALT follows SPY up to a cap and buffers the first 10% of a decline, then resets both every quarter. Four fresh caps a year, at a fee under the shallow-buffer median.

Stated mandate

SEPT The actively managed ETF seeks to match the share-price return of the SPDR S&P 500 ETF Trust at the end of each one-year Outcome Period, subject to an upside Cap and a buffer against the first 10% of losses. It primarily uses FLEX Options referencing that ETF.

ZALT The fund seeks to follow SPY's return up to a predetermined cap while providing a 10% downside buffer over each three-month outcome period. It may be held indefinitely, with the defined outcomes resetting at the end of each period.

Why people hold it

  • SEPT Cheaper than the typical buffer fund at 0.74% a year against a 0.79% median for its shallow-buffer cohort, and it undercuts several rival dated buffers charging 0.79%.
  • The deal is spelled out before you own it: a 10% buffer against losses in the reference ETF and a stated upside cap, both fixed for a one-year outcome period that restarts each September 1.
  • Part of a full AllianzIM buffer lineup priced at the same 0.74%, including six-month siblings SIXZ, SIXD and SIXJ, so a September start date can be laddered with other reset calendars.
  • Running since 2023 and rated among the stronger builds in a crowded 52-fund shallow-buffer field.
  • ZALT Resets on a quarterly clock: a new cap is set the first day of each calendar quarter and the 10% buffer starts over. Can be held indefinitely, no rolling into a new ticker.sec.govcboe.com
  • At 0.69% it undercuts the going rate for 10% buffer funds on the S&P 500, where peers like SIXZ, JULT and BJUN charge 0.74% to 0.79%.
  • The cushion is built from FLEX options on SPY itself, so the thing you are hedged against is the same fund most investors already watch.sec.gov
  • Sits among the stronger implementations in its shallow-buffer peer group on cost and ease of trading.

Worth knowing

  • SEPT Upside is capped, and both cap and buffer apply across the full outcome period. Buy mid-period and your actual protection and ceiling differ from the headline terms.
  • It targets the share-price return of the SPDR S&P 500 ETF Trust, so index dividends are not passed along, and the fund has not been paying out income.
  • A small, thinly traded fund next to the category's giants, so spreads can be wider and limit orders matter more.
  • ZALT Three months of upside buys a lower ceiling. Each quarter's cap is priced off three-month options, so it lands well below what a 12-month buffer fund can offer.sec.gov
  • Buy mid-quarter and you inherit whatever cap and buffer are left, not the full 10%. The prospectus says so plainly.sec.gov
  • The fee comes out of the cushion: with the 0.69% fee counted, the prospectus puts the net buffer at 9.82% per period. No distributions so far, so return shows up in price.sec.gov

Full SEPT profile⁠

Full ZALT profile⁠

SEPT vs ZALT Holdings

How we measure overlap

Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.

SEPT vs ZALT Cost

Overpaying SEPT vs ZALT

$878

On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.

  • SEPT 0.74%

    $14,307

  • ZALT 0.69%

    $13,429

$10,000
30 years

Cost over time

  • SEPT 0.74%
  • ZALT 0.69%
  • Overpaying
One line per fund, from year 0 to year 30. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$5K$10K$15K051015202530SEPT $14,307ZALT $13,429

Year by year

YearSEPTZALTOverpaying
10$1,319$1,232$87
20$5,015$4,697$318
30$14,307$13,429$878

Expense ratio

  • 0.74%SEPT
  • 0.69%ZALT, cheaper
  • Middle half of S&P 500 Buffer 9-12% funds
  • Median 0.79%

ZALT 14th cheapest of 77 funds

SEPT 17th cheapest of 77 funds

SEPT vs ZALT Dividends

Last 12 months to Oct 30, 2026
Payout (12M)
SEPT None
ZALT None

Distribution history

SEPTAll SEPT payments⁠

No distribution history available.

ZALTAll ZALT payments⁠

No distribution history available.

SEPT vs ZALT Risk

Fall from peak · 5 years

This chart needs five years of history for both funds.

Risk facts

VolatilityStd dev, 3 years
SEPT 7.7%ZALT 3.8%, better
Return per unit of riskSharpe ratio, 3 years
SEPT 1.51, betterZALT 1.50
Worst fallMax drawdown, 5 years
SEPT −12.8%since Sep 2023ZALT −8.2%since Oct 2023
Market sensitivityBeta, 5 years
SEPT 0.61ZALT 0.29

SEPT and ZALT in the news

Popular comparisons

  • SEPTBvsAUGPB

    AllianzIM U.S. Equity Buffer10 Sep ETF · PGIM S&P 500 Buffer 12 ETF - August

    Expense ratio
    0.74% · 0.50%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • ZALTAvsAUGPB

    Innovator U.S. Equity 10 Buffer ETF - Quarterly · PGIM S&P 500 Buffer 12 ETF - August

    Expense ratio
    0.69% · 0.50%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • SEPTBvsTENJB

    AllianzIM U.S. Equity Buffer10 Sep ETF · iShares Large Cap 10% Target Buffer Jun ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.74% · 0.53%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • ZALTAvsTENJB

    Innovator U.S. Equity 10 Buffer ETF - Quarterly · iShares Large Cap 10% Target Buffer Jun ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.69% · 0.53%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • SEPTBvsSIXJB

    AllianzIM U.S. Equity Buffer10 Sep ETF · AllianzIM U.S. Equity 6 Month Buffer10 Jan/Jul ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.74% · 0.74%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • ZALTAvsSIXJB

    Innovator U.S. Equity 10 Buffer ETF - Quarterly · AllianzIM U.S. Equity 6 Month Buffer10 Jan/Jul ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.69% · 0.74%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.