ZALT ranks 1st and SEPZ 65th of 77 funds in the S&P 500 Buffer 9-12% Category.
SEPZ vs ZALT
ZALT −0.10pt a year
0.79%0.69%
ZALT 9.9×the volume
14K138K
SEPZ +6.2pt
+16.8%+10.6%
SEPZ vs ZALT Performance
+8.5%+7.1%
- SEPZ 0.79%
- ZALT 0.69%, better
- SEPZ $106M
- ZALT $840M
- SEPZ +8.5%, better
- ZALT +7.1%
- SEPZ 2.03%
- ZALT
- SEPZ 6
- ZALT 503
- SEPZ 14K sh
- ZALT 138K sh, better
- SEPZ $46.43
- ZALT $34.50
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | SEPZ | ZALT |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | C40 | A82Higher |
| Mission | A80 | |
| Risk | F24 | A79Higher |
| Tradability | C46 | B65Higher |
| Holdings | A90 | |
| Durability | C49 | B61Higher |
Rank among S&P 500 Buffer 9-12% funds
Same Category. SEPZ and ZALT are both graded against the same 77 S&P 500 Buffer 9-12% funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
SEPZD
ZALTA
In short
SEPZ The buffered fund that skips the cap. SEPZ aims to absorb the first 8% to 12% of S&P 500 price losses over a 12-month period starting each September, and leaves the upside open instead of selling it off for a ceiling.
ZALT The defined-outcome trade on a three-month clock: ZALT follows SPY up to a cap and buffers the first 10% of a decline, then resets both every quarter. Four fresh caps a year, at a fee under the shallow-buffer median.
Stated mandate
SEPZ The fund seeks returns that track the S&P 500 Price Return Index while providing protection against the first 8% to 12% of losses over a twelve-month period.
ZALT The fund seeks to follow SPY's return up to a predetermined cap while providing a 10% downside buffer over each three-month outcome period. It may be held indefinitely, with the defined outcomes resetting at the end of each period.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
SEPZ vs ZALT Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
SEPZ vs ZALT Cost
Overpaying SEPZ vs ZALT
$1,745
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
SEPZ 0.79%
$15,174
ZALT 0.69%
$13,429
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | SEPZ | ZALT | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $1,405 | $1,232 | $173 |
| 20 | $5,331 | $4,697 | $634 |
| 30 | $15,174 | $13,429 | $1,745 |
- 0.79%SEPZ
- 0.69%ZALT, cheaper
- Middle half of S&P 500 Buffer 9-12% funds
- Median 0.79%
ZALT 14th cheapest of 77 funds
SEPZ 34th cheapest of 77 funds
SEPZ vs ZALT Dividends
- SEPZ 2.03%
- ZALT
- SEPZ $0.93
- ZALT None
- SEPZ $0.93
- ZALT
- SEPZ Dec 24, 2025
- ZALT
- SEPZ Dec 26, 2025
- ZALT
- SEPZ Annual
- ZALT
Distribution history
SEPZ vs ZALT Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- SEPZ 9.5%ZALT 3.8%, better
- Return per unit of risk
- SEPZ 1.23ZALT 1.50, better
- Worst fall
- SEPZ −15.2%ZALT −8.2%
- Market sensitivity
- SEPZ 0.70ZALT 0.29
Popular comparisons
- 0.79% · 0.50%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.69% · 0.50%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.79% · 0.53%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.69% · 0.53%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.79% · 0.74%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.69% · 0.74%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.