Skip to content

SEPZ vs ZALT

TrueShares Structured Outcome (September) ETF

SEPZDCboe

Innovator U.S. Equity 10 Buffer ETF - Quarterly

ZALTACboe

Overlap

Expense ratio

ZALT −0.10pt a year

SEPZ0.79%ZALT0.69%

Avg volume · 30D

ZALT 9.9×the volume

SEPZ14KZALT138K

3Y return · a year

SEPZ +6.2pt

SEPZ+16.8%ZALT+10.6%

SEPZ vs ZALT Performance

Oct 31, 2025 – Oct 30, 2026

+8.5%SEPZ+7.1%ZALT

Oct 31, 2025 to Oct 30, 2026. SEPZ +8.5%. ZALT +7.1%. Use the arrow keys to read each point.−5%−2.5%0%2.5%Oct 2025Apr 2026Oct 2026
Expense ratio
SEPZ 0.79%
ZALT 0.69%, better
Fund size
SEPZ $106M
ZALT $840M
1Y total return
SEPZ +8.5%, better
ZALT +7.1%
Yield (12M)
SEPZ 2.03%
ZALT No data
Holdings
SEPZ 6
ZALT 503
Avg volume (30D)
SEPZ 14K sh
ZALT 138K sh, better
NAV per share
SEPZ $46.43
ZALT $34.50
52W range

ETF.net Grade

SEPZ: Cost 40, Risk 24, Mission not scored, Tradability 46, Holdings not scored, Durability 49. ZALT: Cost 82, Risk 79, Mission 80, Tradability 65, Holdings 90, Durability 61.
Pillar letters and Scores for SEPZ, ZALT, with each pillar’s weight
PillarSEPZZALT
Cost30% weightC40A82Higher
Mission25% weightNot scoredA80
Risk15% weightF24A79Higher
Tradability15% weightC46B65Higher
Holdings10% weightNot scoredA90
Durability5% weightC49B61Higher

Rank among S&P 500 Buffer 9-12% funds

Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

Same Category. SEPZ and ZALT are both graded against the same 77 S&P 500 Buffer 9-12% funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

S&P 500 Buffer 9-12%⁠

Category · 77 funds
See all 77 ›

ZALT ranks 1st and SEPZ 65th of 77 funds in the S&P 500 Buffer 9-12% Category.

  1. Rank 1AZALTInnovator U.S. Equity 10 Buffer ETF - QuarterlyScore 77
  2. Rank 2BAUGPPGIM S&P 500 Buffer 12 ETF - AugustScore 67
  3. Rank 65DNOVZTrueShares Structured Outcome (November) ETFScore 38
  4. Rank 65DSEPZTrueShares Structured Outcome (September) ETFScore 38
  5. Rank 68DDGJAFT Vest U.S. Equity Buffer & Digital Return ETF - JanuaryScore 37

Our read on each fund

ETF.net Research

SEPZDTrueShares Structured Outcome (September) ETF

ZALTAInnovator U.S. Equity 10 Buffer ETF - Quarterly

In short

SEPZ The buffered fund that skips the cap. SEPZ aims to absorb the first 8% to 12% of S&P 500 price losses over a 12-month period starting each September, and leaves the upside open instead of selling it off for a ceiling.

ZALT The defined-outcome trade on a three-month clock: ZALT follows SPY up to a cap and buffers the first 10% of a decline, then resets both every quarter. Four fresh caps a year, at a fee under the shallow-buffer median.

Stated mandate

SEPZ The fund seeks returns that track the S&P 500 Price Return Index while providing protection against the first 8% to 12% of losses over a twelve-month period.

ZALT The fund seeks to follow SPY's return up to a predetermined cap while providing a 10% downside buffer over each three-month outcome period. It may be held indefinitely, with the defined outcomes resetting at the end of each period.

Why people hold it

  • SEPZ No upside ceiling. Most buffered funds trade away gains above a set cap; SEPZ keeps the upside open and pays for its cushion with less than full participation in a rally.true-shares.comtrue-shares.com 2
  • The contract is spelled out: buffer the first 8% to 12% of S&P 500 Price Index losses over a twelve-month outcome period, with the adviser targeting 10%, then reset each September.true-shares.com
  • An original. TrueShares launched the uncapped buffer format in 2020, and SEPZ has run its September-to-September series since that first year.true-shares.com
  • The 0.79% expense ratio sits right at the median for shallow-buffer S&P 500 funds, so the uncapped design does not carry a premium price inside its group.
  • ZALT Resets on a quarterly clock: a new cap is set the first day of each calendar quarter and the 10% buffer starts over. Can be held indefinitely, no rolling into a new ticker.sec.govcboe.com
  • At 0.69% it undercuts the going rate for 10% buffer funds on the S&P 500, where peers like SIXZ, JULT and BJUN charge 0.74% to 0.79%.
  • The cushion is built from FLEX options on SPY itself, so the thing you are hedged against is the same fund most investors already watch.sec.gov
  • Sits among the stronger implementations in its shallow-buffer peer group on cost and ease of trading.

Worth knowing

  • SEPZ Uncapped is not one-for-one. Option costs mean the fund captures only part of an S&P 500 price move, and the reference is the price index, so dividends sit outside the math.true-shares.com
  • The buffer is a target range, not a fixed figure, and it is measured over the full twelve months. Shares bought mid-period carry a different cushion and a different starting point.
  • Thinly traded, so limit orders matter. Costs also vary widely here: laddered buffer peer BUFB charges 0.10%, versus 0.79% for this one.
  • ZALT Three months of upside buys a lower ceiling. Each quarter's cap is priced off three-month options, so it lands well below what a 12-month buffer fund can offer.sec.gov
  • Buy mid-quarter and you inherit whatever cap and buffer are left, not the full 10%. The prospectus says so plainly.sec.gov
  • The fee comes out of the cushion: with the 0.69% fee counted, the prospectus puts the net buffer at 9.82% per period. No distributions so far, so return shows up in price.sec.gov

Full SEPZ profile⁠

Full ZALT profile⁠

SEPZ vs ZALT Holdings

How we measure overlap

Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.

SEPZ vs ZALT Cost

Overpaying SEPZ vs ZALT

$1,745

On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.

  • SEPZ 0.79%

    $15,174

  • ZALT 0.69%

    $13,429

$10,000
30 years

Cost over time

  • SEPZ 0.79%
  • ZALT 0.69%
  • Overpaying
One line per fund, from year 0 to year 30. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$5K$10K$15K$20K051015202530SEPZ $15,174ZALT $13,429

Year by year

YearSEPZZALTOverpaying
10$1,405$1,232$173
20$5,331$4,697$634
30$15,174$13,429$1,745

Expense ratio

  • 0.79%SEPZ
  • 0.69%ZALT, cheaper
  • Middle half of S&P 500 Buffer 9-12% funds
  • Median 0.79%

ZALT 14th cheapest of 77 funds

SEPZ 34th cheapest of 77 funds

SEPZ vs ZALT Dividends

Last 12 months to Oct 30, 2026
Yield (12M)
SEPZ 2.03%
ZALT No data
Payout (12M)
SEPZ $0.93
ZALT None
Last payment
SEPZ $0.93
ZALT No data
Ex-dividend
SEPZ Dec 24, 2025
ZALT No data
Paid on
SEPZ Dec 26, 2025
ZALT No data
Frequency
SEPZ Annual
ZALT No data

Distribution history

Per share, 2021 to 2026, same scale for both

SEPZAnnual · 5 paymentsAll SEPZ payments⁠
One bar per payment. 5 payments from 2021 to 2026 YTD. Dec 29, 2021 $0.02; Dec 29, 2022 $0.20; Dec 27, 2023 $1.19; Dec 27, 2024 $1.38; Dec 24, 2025 $0.93. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$120232026YTD
ZALTAll ZALT payments⁠

No distribution history available.

SEPZ vs ZALT Risk

Fall from peak · 5 years

This chart needs five years of history for both funds.

Risk facts

VolatilityStd dev, 3 years
SEPZ 9.5%ZALT 3.8%, better
Return per unit of riskSharpe ratio, 3 years
SEPZ 1.23ZALT 1.50, better
Worst fallMax drawdown, 5 years
SEPZ −15.2%ZALT −8.2%since Oct 2023
Market sensitivityBeta, 5 years
SEPZ 0.70ZALT 0.29

Popular comparisons

  • SEPZDvsAUGPB

    TrueShares Structured Outcome (September) ETF · PGIM S&P 500 Buffer 12 ETF - August

    Expense ratio
    0.79% · 0.50%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • ZALTAvsAUGPB

    Innovator U.S. Equity 10 Buffer ETF - Quarterly · PGIM S&P 500 Buffer 12 ETF - August

    Expense ratio
    0.69% · 0.50%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • SEPZDvsTENJB

    TrueShares Structured Outcome (September) ETF · iShares Large Cap 10% Target Buffer Jun ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.79% · 0.53%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • ZALTAvsTENJB

    Innovator U.S. Equity 10 Buffer ETF - Quarterly · iShares Large Cap 10% Target Buffer Jun ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.69% · 0.53%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • SEPZDvsSIXJB

    TrueShares Structured Outcome (September) ETF · AllianzIM U.S. Equity 6 Month Buffer10 Jan/Jul ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.79% · 0.74%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • ZALTAvsSIXJB

    Innovator U.S. Equity 10 Buffer ETF - Quarterly · AllianzIM U.S. Equity 6 Month Buffer10 Jan/Jul ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.69% · 0.74%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.