SPDN ranks 1st and SH 2nd of 5 funds in the Inverse S&P 500 Category.
SH vs SPDN
SPDN −0.40pt a year
0.88%0.48%
SPDN 4.7×the volume
8.13M38M
SPDN +0.3pt
−12.5%−12.2%
SH vs SPDN Performance
−30.5%−29.8%
- SH 0.88%
- SPDN 0.48%, better
- SH $950M
- SPDN $291M
- SH −6.0%
- SPDN −5.6%, better
- SH 3.87%, better
- SPDN 3.63%
- SH 5
- SPDN 3
- SH 8.13M sh
- SPDN 38M sh, better
- SH $32.87
- SPDN $8.45
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | SH | SPDN |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | A71 | A87Higher |
| Mission | A85 | |
| Risk | B64 | B66Higher |
| Tradability | B67Higher | B65 |
| Holdings | B55 | |
| Durability | B67Higher | C40 |
Rank among Inverse S&P 500 funds
Same Category. SH and SPDN are both graded against the same 5 Inverse S&P 500 funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
SHA
SPDNA
In short
SH The plain-vanilla bear. SH aims for -1x the S&P 500's daily move with no leverage stacked on top, and it has been doing that since 2006. One of the most heavily traded ways to lean against the index through a single ticker.
SPDN A bet against the S&P 500 without the leverage: SPDN aims for the index's daily move in reverse, one for one, at 0.48% net of a waiver through September 1, 2027, the lowest fee in its short-S&P group.
Stated mandate
SH The fund seeks daily returns before fees and expenses that are the inverse of the S&P 500 Index’s daily performance. It is intended to benefit when that index declines.
SPDN The fund seeks daily results equal to 100% of the inverse performance of the S&P 500® Index, before fees and expenses.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
SH vs SPDN Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
SH vs SPDN Cost
Overpaying SH vs SPDN
$7,100
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
SH 0.88%
$16,705
SPDN 0.48%
$9,605
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | SH | SPDN | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $1,559 | $865 | $694 |
| 20 | $5,891 | $3,328 | $2,563 |
| 30 | $16,705 | $9,605 | $7,100 |
- 0.88%SH
- 0.48%SPDN, cheaper
- Middle half of Inverse S&P 500 funds
- Median 0.90%
SPDN cheapest of 5 funds
SH 2nd cheapest of 5 funds
SH vs SPDN Dividends
- SH 3.87%, better
- SPDN 3.63%
- SH $1.27
- SPDN $0.31
- SH $0.30
- SPDN $0.12
- SH Sep 23, 2026
- SPDN Sep 22, 2026
- SH Sep 29, 2026
- SPDN Sep 29, 2026
- SH Quarterly
- SPDN Quarterly
Distribution history
SH vs SPDN Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
- SH
- SPDN
Risk facts
- Volatility
- SH 11.7%, betterSPDN 11.9%
- Return per unit of risk
- SH −1.60SPDN −1.54, better
- Worst fall
- SH −45.5%SPDN −44.8%, better
- Market sensitivity
- SH −0.97SPDN −0.97Same figure. Both funds show the same value, so neither comes out ahead.
Popular comparisons
- 0.88% · 0.90%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.48% · 0.90%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.88% · 0.91%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.48% · 0.91%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.88% · 1.04%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.48% · 1.04%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.