Skip to content

SIXF vs ZALT

AllianzIM U.S. Equity 6 Month Buffer10 Feb/Aug ETF

SIXFCCboe

Innovator U.S. Equity 10 Buffer ETF - Quarterly

ZALTACboe

Overlap

0.0%by weight

Expense ratio

ZALT −0.05pt a year

SIXF0.74%ZALT0.69%

Avg volume · 30D

ZALT 48.2×the volume

SIXF2.87KZALT138K

SIXF vs ZALT Performance

Oct 31, 2025 – Oct 30, 2026

+11.9%SIXF+7.1%ZALT

Oct 31, 2025 to Oct 30, 2026. SIXF +11.9%. ZALT +7.1%. Use the arrow keys to read each point.0%2.5%5%10%Oct 2025Apr 2026Oct 2026
Expense ratio
SIXF 0.74%
ZALT 0.69%, better
Fund size
SIXF $54M
ZALT $840M
1Y total return
SIXF +11.9%, better
ZALT +7.1%
Holdings
SIXF 3
ZALT 503
Avg volume (30D)
SIXF 2.87K sh
ZALT 138K sh, better
NAV per share
SIXF $35.45
ZALT $34.50
52W range

ETF.net Grade

SIXF: Cost 68, Risk 68, Mission not scored, Tradability 29, Holdings 48, Durability 31. ZALT: Cost 82, Risk 79, Mission 80, Tradability 65, Holdings 90, Durability 61.
Pillar letters and Scores for SIXF, ZALT, with each pillar’s weight
PillarSIXFZALT
Cost30% weightB68A82Higher
Mission25% weightNot scoredA80
Risk15% weightB68A79Higher
Tradability15% weightD29B65Higher
Holdings10% weightC48A90Higher
Durability5% weightD31B61Higher

Rank among S&P 500 Buffer 9-12% funds

Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

Same Category. SIXF and ZALT are both graded against the same 77 S&P 500 Buffer 9-12% funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

S&P 500 Buffer 9-12%⁠

Category · 77 funds
See all 77 ›

ZALT ranks 1st and SIXF 27th of 77 funds in the S&P 500 Buffer 9-12% Category.

  1. Rank 1AZALTInnovator U.S. Equity 10 Buffer ETF - QuarterlyScore 77
  2. Rank 2BAUGPPGIM S&P 500 Buffer 12 ETF - AugustScore 67
  3. Rank 27CMARTAllianzIM U.S. Equity Buffer10 Mar ETFScore 55
  4. Rank 27CSIXFAllianzIM U.S. Equity 6 Month Buffer10 Feb/Aug ETFScore 55
  5. Rank 30CBFEBInnovator U.S. Equity Buffer ETF - FebruaryScore 54

Our read on each fund

ETF.net Research

SIXFCAllianzIM U.S. Equity 6 Month Buffer10 Feb/Aug ETF

ZALTAInnovator U.S. Equity 10 Buffer ETF - Quarterly

In short

SIXF AllianzIM's February/August slot in a six-month buffer lineup: a 10% cushion against S&P 500 tracker declines, an upside cap that gets reset twice a year instead of once, and a fee under the buffer-fund median.

ZALT The defined-outcome trade on a three-month clock: ZALT follows SPY up to a cap and buffers the first 10% of a decline, then resets both every quarter. Four fresh caps a year, at a fee under the shallow-buffer median.

Stated mandate

SIXF The Fund seeks capital appreciation with downside risk mitigation. It is an actively managed ETF investing in a laddered portfolio of six AllianzIM U.S. Equity 6 Month Buffer10 ETFs.

ZALT The fund seeks to follow SPY's return up to a predetermined cap while providing a 10% downside buffer over each three-month outcome period. It may be held indefinitely, with the defined outcomes resetting at the end of each period.

Why people hold it

  • SIXF Outcome periods run six months, resetting each February and August, so the cap is repriced twice as often as a 12-month buffer fund.
  • 0.74% a year, below the 0.79% median for its shallow-buffer peer group, and it sits in the upper half of a crowded field.
  • One rung of a six-fund calendar ladder (SIXJ, SIXZ, SIXD and siblings, all at 0.74%), so start dates can be staggered rather than pinned to a single month.
  • Actively managed against a plain reference point, the SPDR S&P 500 ETF Trust, rather than a bespoke index nobody can look up.
  • ZALT Resets on a quarterly clock: a new cap is set the first day of each calendar quarter and the 10% buffer starts over. Can be held indefinitely, no rolling into a new ticker.sec.govcboe.com
  • At 0.69% it undercuts the going rate for 10% buffer funds on the S&P 500, where peers like SIXZ, JULT and BJUN charge 0.74% to 0.79%.
  • The cushion is built from FLEX options on SPY itself, so the thing you are hedged against is the same fund most investors already watch.sec.gov
  • Sits among the stronger implementations in its shallow-buffer peer group on cost and ease of trading.

Worth knowing

  • SIXF The buffer is a trade: roughly 10% of downside absorbed over the outcome period in exchange for a capped upside. Shares bought mid-period get whatever cushion and cap remain.
  • Among the smaller, more lightly traded corners of the buffer world, which can mean wider bid-ask spreads than the headline names.
  • Launched in 2024, so the record is short. Income is not part of the design; distributions have not been a feature.
  • ZALT Three months of upside buys a lower ceiling. Each quarter's cap is priced off three-month options, so it lands well below what a 12-month buffer fund can offer.sec.gov
  • Buy mid-quarter and you inherit whatever cap and buffer are left, not the full 10%. The prospectus says so plainly.sec.gov
  • The fee comes out of the cushion: with the 0.69% fee counted, the prospectus puts the net buffer at 9.82% per period. No distributions so far, so return shows up in price.sec.gov

Full SIXF profile⁠

Full ZALT profile⁠

SIXF vs ZALT Holdings

How SIXF and ZALT differ

Overlap by weight

0.0%

Shared holdings make up 0.0% of SIXF and 0.0% of ZALT.

Level by level

  • Holdings0 in both0.0%
  • Sector11 Sectors97.6%
  • Asset classEquity100%
  • Countryby domicile100%

Sector

Sector weights in SIXF and ZALT, widest gap first
SectorMore in SIXFMore in ZALT
TechnologySIXF +1.4 points
CommunicationSIXF +0.8 points
FinancialsZALT +0.6 points
Health CareZALT +0.5 points
EnergyZALT +0.4 points
Consumer StaplesZALT +0.4 points
Consumer DiscretionaryZALT +0.3 points
IndustrialsSIXF +0.2 points
UtilitiesZALT +0.1 points
Real EstateZALT +0.1 points
MaterialsSIXF +0.1 points

Country, concentration and asset class

Country by domicile

Country weights in SIXF and ZALT, widest gap first
CountryMore in SIXFMore in ZALT
United StatesSame weight
SwitzerlandSame weight
ChinaSame weight
MexicoSame weight
IrelandSame weight
United KingdomSame weight

Concentration

Weight in the 10 largest Holdings

  • SIXF101.7%
  • ZALT37.7%

Securities held

  • SIXF2
  • ZALT503

Asset class

SIXF
Equity
ZALT
Equity

Holdings

  • Only in SIXF2
  • In both0
  • Only in ZALT503

Only in SIXF

2 securities, 100% of SIXF by weight

  • Spy 01/29/2027 5.53 C99.63%
  • Spy 01/29/2027 746.96 P1.67%

Only in ZALT

503 securities, 100% of ZALT by weight

  • Apple Inc7.59%
  • NVIDIA Corp7.47%
  • Microsoft Corp5.85%

Weight gaps

SIXF and ZALT share no securities.

All 5 SIXF holdings⁠All ZALT holdings⁠

How we measure overlap

Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.

SIXF vs ZALT Cost

Overpaying SIXF vs ZALT

$878

On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.

  • SIXF 0.74%

    $14,307

  • ZALT 0.69%

    $13,429

$10,000
30 years

Cost over time

  • SIXF 0.74%
  • ZALT 0.69%
  • Overpaying
One line per fund, from year 0 to year 30. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$5K$10K$15K051015202530SIXF $14,307ZALT $13,429

Year by year

YearSIXFZALTOverpaying
10$1,319$1,232$87
20$5,015$4,697$318
30$14,307$13,429$878

Expense ratio

  • 0.74%SIXF
  • 0.69%ZALT, cheaper
  • Middle half of S&P 500 Buffer 9-12% funds
  • Median 0.79%

ZALT 14th cheapest of 77 funds

SIXF 17th cheapest of 77 funds

SIXF vs ZALT Dividends

Last 12 months to Oct 30, 2026
Payout (12M)
SIXF None
ZALT None

Distribution history

SIXFAll SIXF payments⁠

No distribution history available.

ZALTAll ZALT payments⁠

No distribution history available.

SIXF vs ZALT Risk

Fall from peak · 5 years

This chart needs five years of history for both funds.

Risk facts

VolatilityStd dev, 3 years
SIXF 5.8%since Mar 2024ZALT 3.8%
Return per unit of riskSharpe ratio, 3 years
SIXF 1.32since Mar 2024ZALT 1.50
Worst fallMax drawdown, 5 years
SIXF −11.3%since Feb 2024ZALT −8.2%since Oct 2023
Market sensitivityBeta, 5 years
SIXF 0.47ZALT 0.29

Popular comparisons

  • SIXFCvsAUGPB

    AllianzIM U.S. Equity 6 Month Buffer10 Feb/Aug ETF · PGIM S&P 500 Buffer 12 ETF - August

    Expense ratio
    0.74% · 0.50%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • ZALTAvsAUGPB

    Innovator U.S. Equity 10 Buffer ETF - Quarterly · PGIM S&P 500 Buffer 12 ETF - August

    Expense ratio
    0.69% · 0.50%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • SIXFCvsTENJB

    AllianzIM U.S. Equity 6 Month Buffer10 Feb/Aug ETF · iShares Large Cap 10% Target Buffer Jun ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.74% · 0.53%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • ZALTAvsTENJB

    Innovator U.S. Equity 10 Buffer ETF - Quarterly · iShares Large Cap 10% Target Buffer Jun ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.69% · 0.53%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • SIXFCvsSIXJB

    AllianzIM U.S. Equity 6 Month Buffer10 Feb/Aug ETF · AllianzIM U.S. Equity 6 Month Buffer10 Jan/Jul ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.74% · 0.74%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • ZALTAvsSIXJB

    Innovator U.S. Equity 10 Buffer ETF - Quarterly · AllianzIM U.S. Equity 6 Month Buffer10 Jan/Jul ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.69% · 0.74%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.