ZALT ranks 1st and SIXJ 4th of 77 funds in the S&P 500 Buffer 9-12% Category.
SIXJ vs ZALT
ZALT −0.05pt a year
0.74%0.69%
ZALT 9.1×the volume
15.1K138K
SIXJ +4.3pt
+14.9%+10.6%
SIXJ vs ZALT Performance
+10.5%+7.1%
- SIXJ 0.74%
- ZALT 0.69%, better
- SIXJ $149M
- ZALT $840M
- SIXJ +10.5%, better
- ZALT +7.1%
- SIXJ 3
- ZALT 503
- SIXJ 15.1K sh
- ZALT 138K sh, better
- SIXJ $37.56
- ZALT $34.50
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | SIXJ | ZALT |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | B68 | A82Higher |
| Mission | A80 | |
| Risk | B67 | A79Higher |
| Tradability | A70Higher | B65 |
| Holdings | C53 | A90Higher |
| Durability | B57 | B61Higher |
Rank among S&P 500 Buffer 9-12% funds
Same Category. SIXJ and ZALT are both graded against the same 77 S&P 500 Buffer 9-12% funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
SIXJB
ZALTA
In short
SIXJ Most buffer ETFs lock you into a 12-month cycle. SIXJ runs a six-month one, resetting each January and July: it tracks SPY's share-price move, absorbs the first 10% of losses, and takes a fresh upside cap twice a year.
ZALT The defined-outcome trade on a three-month clock: ZALT follows SPY up to a cap and buffers the first 10% of a decline, then resets both every quarter. Four fresh caps a year, at a fee under the shallow-buffer median.
Stated mandate
SIXJ The Fund seeks to match the share-price return of SPDR S&P 500 ETF Trust over a six-month outcome period, subject to an upside cap and protection against the first 10% of losses.
ZALT The fund seeks to follow SPY's return up to a predetermined cap while providing a 10% downside buffer over each three-month outcome period. It may be held indefinitely, with the defined outcomes resetting at the end of each period.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
SIXJ vs ZALT Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
SIXJ vs ZALT Cost
Overpaying SIXJ vs ZALT
$878
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
SIXJ 0.74%
$14,307
ZALT 0.69%
$13,429
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | SIXJ | ZALT | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $1,319 | $1,232 | $87 |
| 20 | $5,015 | $4,697 | $318 |
| 30 | $14,307 | $13,429 | $878 |
- 0.74%SIXJ
- 0.69%ZALT, cheaper
- Middle half of S&P 500 Buffer 9-12% funds
- Median 0.79%
ZALT 14th cheapest of 77 funds
SIXJ 17th cheapest of 77 funds
SIXJ vs ZALT Dividends
- SIXJ None
- ZALT None
Distribution history
SIXJ vs ZALT Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- SIXJ 5.9%ZALT 3.8%, better
- Return per unit of risk
- SIXJ 1.67, betterZALT 1.50
- Worst fall
- SIXJ −14.1%ZALT −8.2%
- Market sensitivity
- SIXJ 0.46ZALT 0.29
Popular comparisons
- 0.74% · 0.50%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.69% · 0.50%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.74% · 0.53%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.69% · 0.53%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.74% · 0.69%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.69% · 0.69%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.