ZALT ranks 1st and SIXO 13th of 77 funds in the S&P 500 Buffer 9-12% Category.
SIXO vs ZALT
ZALT −0.05pt a year
0.74%0.69%
ZALT 11.0×the volume
12.3K135K
ZALT +0.3pt
+9.7%+10.0%
SIXO vs ZALT Performance
+7.0%+7.7%
- SIXO 0.74%
- ZALT 0.69%, better
- SIXO $118M
- ZALT $835M
- SIXO +7.0%
- ZALT +7.7%, better
- SIXO 3
- ZALT 503
- SIXO 12.3K sh
- ZALT 135K sh, better
- SIXO $35.97
- ZALT $34.14
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | SIXO | ZALT |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | B68 | A82Higher |
| Mission | A80 | |
| Risk | C53 | A73Higher |
| Tradability | B68Higher | B65 |
| Holdings | C49 | A89Higher |
| Durability | C48 | B61Higher |
Rank among S&P 500 Buffer 9-12% funds
Same Category. SIXO and ZALT are both graded against the same 77 S&P 500 Buffer 9-12% funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
SIXOB
ZALTA
In short
SIXO Most buffer ETFs lock you into a 12-month wait. SIXO runs on six-month outcome periods, April and October, absorbing the first 10% of a drop in the S&P 500 ETF's price in exchange for a cap that resets twice as often.
ZALT The defined-outcome trade on a three-month clock: ZALT follows SPY up to a cap and buffers the first 10% of a decline, then resets both every quarter. Four fresh caps a year, at a fee under the shallow-buffer median.
Stated mandate
SIXO The Fund seeks to match the SPDR S&P 500 ETF Trust’s share-price return at the end of each six-month Outcome Period, subject to an upside Cap and a first-10% downside loss buffer. It invests substantially all assets in FLEX Options referencing that ETF.
ZALT The fund seeks to follow SPY's return up to a predetermined cap while providing a 10% downside buffer over each three-month outcome period. It may be held indefinitely, with the defined outcomes resetting at the end of each period.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
SIXO vs ZALT Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
SIXO vs ZALT Cost
Overpaying SIXO vs ZALT
$878
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
SIXO 0.74%
$14,307
ZALT 0.69%
$13,429
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | SIXO | ZALT | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $1,319 | $1,232 | $87 |
| 20 | $5,015 | $4,697 | $318 |
| 30 | $14,307 | $13,429 | $878 |
- 0.74%SIXO
- 0.69%ZALT, cheaper
- Middle half of S&P 500 Buffer 9-12% funds
- Median 0.79%
ZALT 14th cheapest of 77 funds
SIXO 17th cheapest of 77 funds
SIXO vs ZALT Dividends
- SIXO None
- ZALT None
Distribution history
SIXO vs ZALT Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- SIXO 6.0%ZALT 3.8%, better
- Return per unit of risk
- SIXO 0.96ZALT 1.51, better
- Worst fall
- SIXO −12.0%ZALT −8.2%
- Market sensitivity
- SIXO 0.52ZALT 0.29
SIXO and ZALT in the news
Filings Digest
AllianzIM launches OCTI and resets October buffer terms

Popular comparisons
- 0.74% · 0.50%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.69% · 0.50%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.74% · 0.74%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.69% · 0.74%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.74% · 0.50%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.69% · 0.50%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.