Skip to content

SIXP vs ZALT

AllianzIM U.S. Equity 6 Month Buffer10 Mar/Sep ETF

SIXPBCboe

Innovator U.S. Equity 10 Buffer ETF - Quarterly

ZALTACboe

Overlap

Expense ratio

ZALT −0.05pt a year

SIXP0.74%ZALT0.69%

Avg volume · 30D

ZALT 35.2×the volume

SIXP3.84KZALT135K

SIXP vs ZALT Performance

Nov 7, 2025 – Nov 9, 2026

+11.2%SIXP+7.7%ZALT

Nov 7, 2025 to Nov 9, 2026. SIXP +11.2%. ZALT +7.7%. Use the arrow keys to read each point.0%2.5%5%Nov 2025May 2026Nov 2026
Expense ratio
SIXP 0.74%
ZALT 0.69%, better
Fund size
SIXP $215M
ZALT $835M
1Y total return
SIXP +11.2%, better
ZALT +7.7%
Holdings
SIXP 3
ZALT 503
Avg volume (30D)
SIXP 3.84K sh
ZALT 135K sh, better
NAV per share
SIXP $33.88
ZALT $34.14
52W range

ETF.net Grade

SIXP: Cost 68, Risk 64, Mission not scored, Tradability 35, Holdings 56, Durability 56. ZALT: Cost 82, Risk 73, Mission 80, Tradability 65, Holdings 89, Durability 61.
Pillar letters and Scores for SIXP, ZALT, with each pillar’s weight
PillarSIXPZALT
Cost30% weightB68A82Higher
Mission25% weightNot scoredA80
Risk15% weightB64A73Higher
Tradability15% weightD35B65Higher
Holdings10% weightB56A89Higher
Durability5% weightB56B61Higher

Rank among S&P 500 Buffer 9-12% funds

Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

Same Category. SIXP and ZALT are both graded against the same 77 S&P 500 Buffer 9-12% funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

S&P 500 Buffer 9-12%⁠

Category · 77 funds
See all 77 ›

ZALT ranks 1st and SIXP 18th of 77 funds in the S&P 500 Buffer 9-12% Category.

  1. Rank 1AZALTInnovator U.S. Equity 10 Buffer ETF - QuarterlyScore 76
  2. Rank 2BAUGPPGIM S&P 500 Buffer 12 ETF - AugustScore 66
  3. Rank 18BJULTAllianzIM U.S. Equity Buffer10 Jul ETFScore 58
  4. Rank 18BSIXPAllianzIM U.S. Equity 6 Month Buffer10 Mar/Sep ETFScore 58
  5. Rank 22BBOCTInnovator U.S. Equity Buffer ETFScore 57

Our read on each fund

ETF.net Research

SIXPBAllianzIM U.S. Equity 6 Month Buffer10 Mar/Sep ETF

ZALTAInnovator U.S. Equity 10 Buffer ETF - Quarterly

In short

SIXP Ten percent of the downside absorbed, the upside capped, and the whole deal re-struck every six months instead of once a year. SIXP is the March/September dial in AllianzIM's semiannual buffer lineup.

ZALT The defined-outcome trade on a three-month clock: ZALT follows SPY up to a cap and buffers the first 10% of a decline, then resets both every quarter. Four fresh caps a year, at a fee under the shallow-buffer median.

Stated mandate

SIXP The Fund is designed to match the share-price return of the SPDR S&P 500 ETF Trust at the end of each six-month Outcome Period, subject to an upside Cap. It also seeks to absorb the first 10% of the reference ETF’s losses.

ZALT The fund seeks to follow SPY's return up to a predetermined cap while providing a 10% downside buffer over each three-month outcome period. It may be held indefinitely, with the defined outcomes resetting at the end of each period.

Why people hold it

  • SIXP Absorbs the first 10% of the reference S&P 500 ETF's decline over each six-month outcome period, with the upside capped.
  • Resets twice a year, in March and September, so the cap is re-struck against fresher pricing more often than in a standard 12-month buffer fund.
  • 0.74% a year, a shade under the typical fee among shallow-buffer funds.
  • A 1940 Act fund holding its own options package rather than a bank note, and it sits in the upper half of a crowded shallow-buffer field.
  • ZALT Resets on a quarterly clock: a new cap is set the first day of each calendar quarter and the 10% buffer starts over. Can be held indefinitely, no rolling into a new ticker.sec.govcboe.com
  • At 0.69% it undercuts the going rate for 10% buffer funds on the S&P 500, where peers like SIXZ, JULT and BJUN charge 0.74% to 0.79%.
  • The cushion is built from FLEX options on SPY itself, so the thing you are hedged against is the same fund most investors already watch.sec.gov
  • Sits among the stronger implementations in its shallow-buffer peer group on cost and ease of trading.

Worth knowing

  • SIXP The cap is the price of the cushion, and each new cap is set at the reset, moving with volatility and rates. Enter mid-period and your cushion and ceiling differ from the stated terms.
  • It targets the reference ETF's share-price return, so dividends aren't part of the deal, and this fund hasn't been paying distributions.
  • A small, lightly traded fund next to the biggest buffer names, so spreads can be wider.
  • ZALT Three months of upside buys a lower ceiling. Each quarter's cap is priced off three-month options, so it lands well below what a 12-month buffer fund can offer.sec.gov
  • Buy mid-quarter and you inherit whatever cap and buffer are left, not the full 10%. The prospectus says so plainly.sec.gov
  • The fee comes out of the cushion: with the 0.69% fee counted, the prospectus puts the net buffer at 9.82% per period. No distributions so far, so return shows up in price.sec.gov

Full SIXP profile⁠

Full ZALT profile⁠

SIXP vs ZALT Holdings

How we measure overlap

Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.

SIXP vs ZALT Cost

Overpaying SIXP vs ZALT

$878

On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.

  • SIXP 0.74%

    $14,307

  • ZALT 0.69%

    $13,429

$10,000
30 years

Cost over time

  • SIXP 0.74%
  • ZALT 0.69%
  • Overpaying
One line per fund, from year 0 to year 30. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$5K$10K$15K051015202530SIXP $14,307ZALT $13,429

Year by year

YearSIXPZALTOverpaying
10$1,319$1,232$87
20$5,015$4,697$318
30$14,307$13,429$878

Expense ratio

  • 0.74%SIXP
  • 0.69%ZALT, cheaper
  • Middle half of S&P 500 Buffer 9-12% funds
  • Median 0.79%

ZALT 14th cheapest of 77 funds

SIXP 17th cheapest of 77 funds

SIXP vs ZALT Dividends

Last 12 months to Nov 9, 2026
Payout (12M)
SIXP None
ZALT None

Distribution history

SIXPAll SIXP payments⁠

No distribution history available.

ZALTAll ZALT payments⁠

No distribution history available.

SIXP vs ZALT Risk

Fall from peak · 5 years

This chart needs five years of history for both funds.

Risk facts

VolatilityStd dev, 3 years
SIXP 6.0%since Apr 2024ZALT 3.8%
Return per unit of riskSharpe ratio, 3 years
SIXP 1.27since Apr 2024ZALT 1.51
Worst fallMax drawdown, 5 years
SIXP −11.3%since Mar 2024ZALT −8.2%since Oct 2023
Market sensitivityBeta, 5 years
SIXP 0.48ZALT 0.29

Popular comparisons

  • SIXPBvsAUGPB

    AllianzIM U.S. Equity 6 Month Buffer10 Mar/Sep ETF · PGIM S&P 500 Buffer 12 ETF - August

    Expense ratio
    0.74% · 0.50%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • ZALTAvsAUGPB

    Innovator U.S. Equity 10 Buffer ETF - Quarterly · PGIM S&P 500 Buffer 12 ETF - August

    Expense ratio
    0.69% · 0.50%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • SIXPBvsSIXJB

    AllianzIM U.S. Equity 6 Month Buffer10 Mar/Sep ETF · AllianzIM U.S. Equity 6 Month Buffer10 Jan/Jul ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.74% · 0.74%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • ZALTAvsSIXJB

    Innovator U.S. Equity 10 Buffer ETF - Quarterly · AllianzIM U.S. Equity 6 Month Buffer10 Jan/Jul ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.69% · 0.74%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • SIXPBvsJANPB

    AllianzIM U.S. Equity 6 Month Buffer10 Mar/Sep ETF · PGIM S&P 500 Buffer 12 ETF - January

    Expense ratio
    0.74% · 0.50%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • ZALTAvsJANPB

    Innovator U.S. Equity 10 Buffer ETF - Quarterly · PGIM S&P 500 Buffer 12 ETF - January

    Expense ratio
    0.69% · 0.50%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.