Skip to content

SIXZ vs ZALT

AllianzIM U.S. Equity 6 Month Buffer10 May/Nov ETF

SIXZBCboe

Innovator U.S. Equity 10 Buffer ETF - Quarterly

ZALTACboe

Overlap

0.0%by weight

Expense ratio

ZALT −0.05pt a year

SIXZ0.74%ZALT0.69%

Avg volume · 30D

ZALT 25.5×the volume

SIXZ5.41KZALT138K

SIXZ vs ZALT Performance

Oct 31, 2025 – Oct 30, 2026

+10.0%SIXZ+7.1%ZALT

Oct 31, 2025 to Oct 30, 2026. SIXZ +10.0%. ZALT +7.1%. Use the arrow keys to read each point.−2.5%0%2.5%5%12.5%Oct 2025Apr 2026Oct 2026
Expense ratio
SIXZ 0.74%
ZALT 0.69%, better
Fund size
SIXZ $65M
ZALT $840M
1Y total return
SIXZ +10.0%, better
ZALT +7.1%
Holdings
SIXZ 3
ZALT 503
Avg volume (30D)
SIXZ 5.41K sh
ZALT 138K sh, better
NAV per share
SIXZ $32.80
ZALT $34.50
52W range

ETF.net Grade

SIXZ: Cost 68, Risk 63, Mission not scored, Tradability 34, Holdings 47, Durability 47. ZALT: Cost 82, Risk 79, Mission 80, Tradability 65, Holdings 90, Durability 61.
Pillar letters and Scores for SIXZ, ZALT, with each pillar’s weight
PillarSIXZZALT
Cost30% weightB68A82Higher
Mission25% weightNot scoredA80
Risk15% weightB63A79Higher
Tradability15% weightD34B65Higher
Holdings10% weightC47A90Higher
Durability5% weightC47B61Higher

Rank among S&P 500 Buffer 9-12% funds

Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

Same Category. SIXZ and ZALT are both graded against the same 77 S&P 500 Buffer 9-12% funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

S&P 500 Buffer 9-12%⁠

Category · 77 funds
See all 77 ›

ZALT ranks 1st and SIXZ 23rd of 77 funds in the S&P 500 Buffer 9-12% Category.

  1. Rank 1AZALTInnovator U.S. Equity 10 Buffer ETF - QuarterlyScore 77
  2. Rank 2BAUGPPGIM S&P 500 Buffer 12 ETF - AugustScore 67
  3. Rank 23BSEPTAllianzIM U.S. Equity Buffer10 Sep ETFScore 56
  4. Rank 23BSIXZAllianzIM U.S. Equity 6 Month Buffer10 May/Nov ETFScore 56
  5. Rank 27CBJANInnovator U.S. Equity Buffer ETFScore 55

Our read on each fund

ETF.net Research

SIXZBAllianzIM U.S. Equity 6 Month Buffer10 May/Nov ETF

ZALTAInnovator U.S. Equity 10 Buffer ETF - Quarterly

In short

SIXZ Most buffered ETFs lock you into a 12-month cycle. SIXZ runs six-month outcome periods, so the 10% downside buffer on the S&P 500 and the upside cap both reset every May and November.

ZALT The defined-outcome trade on a three-month clock: ZALT follows SPY up to a cap and buffers the first 10% of a decline, then resets both every quarter. Four fresh caps a year, at a fee under the shallow-buffer median.

Stated mandate

SIXZ The Fund uses recurring six-month Outcome Periods and resets its upside Cap at each period. For the May 1–October 31, 2026 period, the SEC disclosed an estimated pre-fee Cap range of 6.00%–9.00%.

ZALT The fund seeks to follow SPY's return up to a predetermined cap while providing a 10% downside buffer over each three-month outcome period. It may be held indefinitely, with the defined outcomes resetting at the end of each period.

Why people hold it

  • SIXZ Six-month outcome periods: the 10% buffer and the upside cap reset each May 1 and November 1 instead of sitting fixed for a full year.
  • At 0.74% a year, it charges less than the median fund in its shallow-buffer peer group.
  • Easy to trade for a defined-outcome fund, among the cleanest in its cohort, which matters most when you step in or out between reset dates.
  • Built as a registered 1940 Act fund tied to the SPDR S&P 500 ETF Trust, so you hold an ETF rather than a bank-issued structured note.
  • ZALT Resets on a quarterly clock: a new cap is set the first day of each calendar quarter and the 10% buffer starts over. Can be held indefinitely, no rolling into a new ticker.sec.govcboe.com
  • At 0.69% it undercuts the going rate for 10% buffer funds on the S&P 500, where peers like SIXZ, JULT and BJUN charge 0.74% to 0.79%.
  • The cushion is built from FLEX options on SPY itself, so the thing you are hedged against is the same fund most investors already watch.sec.gov
  • Sits among the stronger implementations in its shallow-buffer peer group on cost and ease of trading.

Worth knowing

  • SIXZ The price of the buffer is a ceiling. Strong six-month runs get trimmed, and the new cap is only set when each period opens.
  • Buffer and cap are measured from the start of each outcome period. Buy midway and your own protection and upside differ from the headline terms.
  • 0.74% adds up next to plain index funds, and some buffer peers ask less (ZALT 0.69%, BUFB 0.10%). It also launched in 2024, so the record is short.
  • ZALT Three months of upside buys a lower ceiling. Each quarter's cap is priced off three-month options, so it lands well below what a 12-month buffer fund can offer.sec.gov
  • Buy mid-quarter and you inherit whatever cap and buffer are left, not the full 10%. The prospectus says so plainly.sec.gov
  • The fee comes out of the cushion: with the 0.69% fee counted, the prospectus puts the net buffer at 9.82% per period. No distributions so far, so return shows up in price.sec.gov

Full SIXZ profile⁠

Full ZALT profile⁠

SIXZ vs ZALT Holdings

How SIXZ and ZALT differ

Overlap by weight

0.0%

Shared holdings make up 0.0% of SIXZ and 0.0% of ZALT.

Level by level

  • Holdings0 in both0.0%
  • Sector11 Sectors97.6%
  • Asset classEquity100%
  • Countryby domicile100%

Sector

Sector weights in SIXZ and ZALT, widest gap first
SectorMore in SIXZMore in ZALT
TechnologySIXZ +1.4 points
CommunicationSIXZ +0.8 points
FinancialsZALT +0.6 points
Health CareZALT +0.5 points
EnergyZALT +0.4 points
Consumer StaplesZALT +0.4 points
Consumer DiscretionaryZALT +0.3 points
IndustrialsSIXZ +0.2 points
UtilitiesZALT +0.1 points
Real EstateZALT +0.1 points
MaterialsSIXZ +0.1 points

Country, concentration and asset class

Country by domicile

Country weights in SIXZ and ZALT, widest gap first
CountryMore in SIXZMore in ZALT
United StatesSame weight
SwitzerlandSame weight
ChinaSame weight
MexicoSame weight
IrelandSame weight
United KingdomSame weight

Concentration

Weight in the 10 largest Holdings

  • SIXZ100.1%
  • ZALT37.7%

Securities held

  • SIXZ2
  • ZALT503

Asset class

SIXZ
Equity
ZALT
Equity

Holdings

  • Only in SIXZ2
  • In both0
  • Only in ZALT503

Only in SIXZ

2 securities, 99.8% of SIXZ by weight

  • Spy 10/30/2026 5.32 C99.78%
  • Spy 10/30/2026 718.59 P<0.01%

Only in ZALT

503 securities, 100% of ZALT by weight

  • Apple Inc7.59%
  • NVIDIA Corp7.47%
  • Microsoft Corp5.85%

Weight gaps

SIXZ and ZALT share no securities.

All 5 SIXZ holdings⁠All ZALT holdings⁠

How we measure overlap

Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.

SIXZ vs ZALT Cost

Overpaying SIXZ vs ZALT

$878

On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.

  • SIXZ 0.74%

    $14,307

  • ZALT 0.69%

    $13,429

$10,000
30 years

Cost over time

  • SIXZ 0.74%
  • ZALT 0.69%
  • Overpaying
One line per fund, from year 0 to year 30. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$5K$10K$15K051015202530SIXZ $14,307ZALT $13,429

Year by year

YearSIXZZALTOverpaying
10$1,319$1,232$87
20$5,015$4,697$318
30$14,307$13,429$878

Expense ratio

  • 0.74%SIXZ
  • 0.69%ZALT, cheaper
  • Middle half of S&P 500 Buffer 9-12% funds
  • Median 0.79%

ZALT 14th cheapest of 77 funds

SIXZ 17th cheapest of 77 funds

SIXZ vs ZALT Dividends

Last 12 months to Oct 30, 2026
Payout (12M)
SIXZ None
ZALT None

Distribution history

SIXZAll SIXZ payments⁠

No distribution history available.

ZALTAll ZALT payments⁠

No distribution history available.

SIXZ vs ZALT Risk

Fall from peak · 5 years

This chart needs five years of history for both funds.

Risk facts

VolatilityStd dev, 3 years
SIXZ 6.0%since Jun 2024ZALT 3.8%
Return per unit of riskSharpe ratio, 3 years
SIXZ 0.89since Jun 2024ZALT 1.50
Worst fallMax drawdown, 5 years
SIXZ −10.3%since May 2024ZALT −8.2%since Oct 2023
Market sensitivityBeta, 5 years
SIXZ 0.50ZALT 0.29

SIXZ and ZALT in the news

Popular comparisons

  • SIXZBvsAUGPB

    AllianzIM U.S. Equity 6 Month Buffer10 May/Nov ETF · PGIM S&P 500 Buffer 12 ETF - August

    Expense ratio
    0.74% · 0.50%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • ZALTAvsAUGPB

    Innovator U.S. Equity 10 Buffer ETF - Quarterly · PGIM S&P 500 Buffer 12 ETF - August

    Expense ratio
    0.69% · 0.50%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • SIXZBvsTENJB

    AllianzIM U.S. Equity 6 Month Buffer10 May/Nov ETF · iShares Large Cap 10% Target Buffer Jun ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.74% · 0.53%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • ZALTAvsTENJB

    Innovator U.S. Equity 10 Buffer ETF - Quarterly · iShares Large Cap 10% Target Buffer Jun ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.69% · 0.53%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • SIXZBvsSIXJB

    AllianzIM U.S. Equity 6 Month Buffer10 May/Nov ETF · AllianzIM U.S. Equity 6 Month Buffer10 Jan/Jul ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.74% · 0.74%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • ZALTAvsSIXJB

    Innovator U.S. Equity 10 Buffer ETF - Quarterly · AllianzIM U.S. Equity 6 Month Buffer10 Jan/Jul ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.69% · 0.74%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.