SPBO ranks 2nd and SUSC 12th of 49 funds in the Investment Grade Corporate Category.
SPBO vs SUSC
SPBO −0.15pt a year
0.03%0.18%
SPBO 2.4×the volume
591K247K
SPBO +0.4pt
+0.1%−0.3%
SPBO vs SUSC Performance
+0.3%−1.4%
- SPBO 0.03%, better
- SUSC 0.18%
- SPBO $2.14B
- SUSC $1.31B
- SPBO −0.4%, better
- SUSC −0.7%
- SPBO 5.28%, better
- SUSC 4.70%
- SPBO 4468
- SUSC 3946
- SPBO 591K sh, better
- SUSC 247K sh
- SPBO $27.95
- SUSC $22.35
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | SPBO | SUSC |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | A98Higher | A70 |
| Mission | A100 | A100 |
| Risk | C54Higher | D28 |
| Tradability | A96Higher | B64 |
| Holdings | A82 | A90Higher |
| Durability | A90Higher | A77 |
Rank among Investment Grade Corporate funds
Same Category. SPBO and SUSC are both graded against the same 49 Investment Grade Corporate funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
SPBOA
SUSCA
In short
SPBO The whole investment-grade corporate bond market in one ticker for three basis points. Most rivals sell you a maturity slice; SPBO owns the lot, and it undercuts other funds tracking the very same Bloomberg index.
SUSC Corporate bond beta with a conscience filter: roughly 4,000 investment-grade USD bonds, screened on business involvement and tilted toward better ESG profiles, in one ticker. Trading since 2017, paying monthly.
Stated mandate
SPBO The fund seeks investment results that generally correspond, before fees and expenses, to the price and yield performance of the Bloomberg U.S. Corporate Bond Index.
SUSC The fund seeks to track an index of investment-grade USD corporate bonds with positive environmental, social, and governance characteristics in aggregate.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
SPBO vs SUSC Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
SPBO vs SUSC Cost
Overpaying SUSC vs SPBO
$3,111
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
SPBO 0.03%
$638
SUSC 0.18%
$3,749
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | SPBO | SUSC | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $55 | $328 | $273 |
| 20 | $216 | $1,281 | $1,065 |
| 30 | $638 | $3,749 | $3,111 |
- 0.03%SPBO, cheaper
- 0.18%SUSC
- Middle half of Investment Grade Corporate funds
- Median 0.25%
SPBO cheapest of 49 funds
SUSC 14th cheapest of 49 funds
SPBO vs SUSC Dividends
- SPBO 5.28%, better
- SUSC 4.70%
- SPBO $1.48
- SUSC $1.05
- SPBO $0.12
- SUSC $0.09
- SPBO Oct 1, 2026
- SUSC Oct 1, 2026
- SPBO Oct 6, 2026
- SUSC Oct 6, 2026
- SPBO Monthly
- SUSC Monthly
Distribution history
SPBO vs SUSC Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
- SPBO
- SUSC
Risk facts
- Volatility
- SPBO 6.4%SUSC 6.3%, better
- Return per unit of risk
- SPBO 0.34, betterSUSC 0.29
- Worst fall
- SPBO −21.7%, betterSUSC −22.0%
- Market sensitivity
- SPBO 1.11SUSC 1.11Same figure. Both funds show the same value, so neither comes out ahead.
Popular comparisons
- 0.03% · 0.04%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.18% · 0.04%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.03% · 0.03%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.18% · 0.03%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.03% · 0.08%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.18% · 0.08%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.