USCL ranks 7th and STNC 46th of 47 funds in the US ESG & Values Index Category.
STNC vs USCL
USCL −0.87pt a year
0.95%0.08%
USCL 8.7×the volume
1.51K13.1K
USCL +4.5pt
+15.4%+19.9%
STNC vs USCL Performance
+16.0%+9.6%
- STNC 0.95%
- USCL 0.08%, better
- STNC $92M
- USCL $2.61B
- STNC +16.0%, better
- USCL +9.6%
- STNC 0.90%
- USCL 1.06%, better
- STNC 46
- USCL 393
- STNC 1.51K sh
- USCL 13.1K sh, better
- STNC $37.04
- USCL $83.10
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | STNC | USCL |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | F0 | A99Higher |
| Mission | ||
| Risk | B56Higher | B55 |
| Tradability | D34 | B69Higher |
| Holdings | C47Higher | D34 |
| Durability | D35 | A71Higher |
Rank among US ESG & Values Index funds
Same Category. STNC and USCL are both graded against the same 47 US ESG & Values Index funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
STNCD
USCLA
In short
STNC Most ESG funds are a screened S&P 500 index for a few basis points. STNC takes the other road: an active, roughly 70-stock book built from a sustainability ranking, a machine-learning screen and a tail-risk optimizer, at 0.95%.
USCL Most ESG index funds work by exclusion. USCL scores roughly 400 US large and mid caps on where they're heading instead: emissions intensity, reduction targets, green revenue. And it charges 0.08% a year to do it.
Stated mandate
STNC The Fund seeks long-term capital appreciation. It is an actively managed ETF investing at least 80% of net assets plus investment borrowings in exchange-traded equity securities of U.S. issuers meeting sustainability and fundamental financial standards.
USCL The Fund seeks to track an index of U.S. large- and mid-capitalization companies selected for their relative positioning on the transition to a low-carbon economy, using climate-related measures such as emissions intensity, reduction targets, green-business revenue, and climate-risk management.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
STNC vs USCL Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
STNC vs USCL Cost
Overpaying STNC vs USCL
$16,180
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
STNC 0.95%
$17,869
USCL 0.08%
$1,689
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | STNC | USCL | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $1,678 | $147 | $1,531 |
| 20 | $6,322 | $575 | $5,747 |
| 30 | $17,869 | $1,689 | $16,180 |
- 0.95%STNC
- 0.08%USCL, cheaper
- Middle half of US ESG & Values Index funds
- Median 0.25%
USCL cheapest of 47 funds
STNC 47th cheapest of 47 funds
STNC vs USCL Dividends
- STNC 0.90%
- USCL 1.06%, better
- STNC $0.34
- USCL $0.91
- STNC $0.34
- USCL $0.20
- STNC Dec 12, 2025
- USCL Sep 15, 2026
- STNC Dec 15, 2025
- USCL Sep 18, 2026
- STNC Annual
- USCL Quarterly
Distribution history
STNC vs USCL Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- STNC 13.3%USCL 12.5%, better
- Return per unit of risk
- STNC 0.90USCL 1.28, better
- Worst fall
- STNC −22.3%USCL −19.0%
- Market sensitivity
- STNC 0.80USCL 1.01
Popular comparisons
- 0.95% · 0.09%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.08% · 0.09%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.95% · 0.10%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.08% · 0.10%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.95% · 0.10%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.08% · 0.10%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.