VGMS ranks 1st and TMSF 6th of 23 funds in the Multi-Sector Bond Income Category.
TMSF vs VGMS
VGMS −0.11pt a year
0.41%0.30%
VGMS 47.7×the volume
1.68K80.4K
TMSF vs VGMS Performance
+1.8%+0.6%
- TMSF 0.41%
- VGMS 0.30%, better
- TMSF $58M
- VGMS $298M
- TMSF
- VGMS +1.8%
- TMSF
- VGMS 5.56%
- TMSF 346
- VGMS 1190
- TMSF 1.68K sh
- VGMS 80.4K sh, better
- TMSF $49.04
- VGMS $49.75
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | TMSF | VGMS |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | A75 | A100Higher |
| Mission | A95 | A95 |
| Risk | A71 | A71 |
| Tradability | D29 | B61Higher |
| Holdings | C44 | A100Higher |
| Durability | D39 | A71Higher |
Rank among Multi-Sector Bond Income funds
Same Category. TMSF and VGMS are both graded against the same 23 Multi-Sector Bond Income funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
TMSFB
VGMSA
In short
TMSF T. Rowe's bond desk, off the leash: high yield, bank loans, securitized credit, emerging market debt and developed government bonds, with the mix shifting as its managers' outlook does. No index, 0.41%, no waiver.
Stated mandate
TMSF The fund seeks high income together with some capital appreciation.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
TMSF vs VGMS Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
TMSF vs VGMS Cost
Overpaying TMSF vs VGMS
$2,132
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
TMSF 0.41%
$8,281
VGMS 0.30%
$6,149
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | TMSF | VGMS | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $741 | $545 | $196 |
| 20 | $2,860 | $2,113 | $747 |
| 30 | $8,281 | $6,149 | $2,132 |
- 0.41%TMSF
- 0.30%VGMS, cheaper
- Middle half of Multi-Sector Bond Income funds
- Median 0.60%
VGMS cheapest of 23 funds
TMSF 7th cheapest of 23 funds
TMSF vs VGMS Dividends
- TMSF
- VGMS 5.56%
- TMSF
- VGMS $2.77
- TMSF $0.25
- VGMS $0.22
- TMSF Oct 27, 2026
- VGMS Oct 1, 2026
- TMSF Oct 29, 2026
- VGMS Oct 5, 2026
- TMSF Monthly
- VGMS Monthly
Distribution history
TMSF vs VGMS Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- TMSF VGMS 3.4%
- Return per unit of risk
- TMSF VGMS −0.10
- Worst fall
- TMSF VGMS −2.7%
- Market sensitivity
- TMSF 0.18VGMS 0.14
TMSF and VGMS in the news
First-Year Review
Hartford Dynamic Bond ETF's first year: coupons covered a 3.9% slide

Popular comparisons
- 0.41% · 0.36%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.30% · 0.36%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.41% · 0.40%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.30% · 0.40%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.41% · 0.50%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.30% · 0.50%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.