UNHG ranks 2nd and VRTL 264th of 315 funds in the Single-Stock Long Leveraged Category.
UNHG vs VRTL
UNHG −1.51pt a year
0.77%2.28%
UNHG 3.3×the volume
726K220K
UNHG vs VRTL Performance
+11.9%−22.3%
- UNHG 0.77%, better
- VRTL 2.28%
- UNHG $63M
- VRTL $43M
- UNHG +11.9%, better
- VRTL −22.3%
- UNHG 5
- VRTL 2
- UNHG 726K sh, better
- VRTL 220K sh
- UNHG $20.57
- VRTL $22.39
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | UNHG | VRTL |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | B60Higher | F0 |
| Mission | A90 | A93Higher |
| Risk | A83Higher | B56 |
| Tradability | A91Higher | B69 |
| Holdings | ||
| Durability | B66 | A76Higher |
Rank among Single-Stock Long Leveraged funds
Same Category. UNHG and VRTL are both graded against the same 315 Single-Stock Long Leveraged funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
UNHGA
VRTLD
In short
UNHG Two times UnitedHealth's daily move, reset every night: a managed-care insurer in a category stuffed with chip and AI names. UNHG got there first, and it charges 0.77%.
VRTL Vertiv sells the power gear and liquid cooling inside AI data centers. VRTL takes that one stock and gears it 2x, one session at a time, resetting daily. A trader's instrument by design, per its own fact sheet.
Stated mandate
UNHG The fund seeks daily investment results equal to twice the daily performance of UnitedHealth Group Incorporated stock, before fees and expenses.
VRTL The Fund seeks daily investment results, before fees and expenses, equal to two times the daily percentage change of Vertiv Holdings Co.'s common stock.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
UNHG vs VRTL Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
UNHG vs VRTL Cost
Overpaying VRTL vs UNHG
$21,401
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
UNHG 0.77%
$14,829
VRTL 2.28%
$36,230
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | UNHG | VRTL | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $1,371 | $3,812 | $2,441 |
| 20 | $5,205 | $13,544 | $8,339 |
| 30 | $14,829 | $36,230 | $21,401 |
- 0.77%UNHG, cheaper
- 2.28%VRTL
- Middle half of Single-Stock Long Leveraged funds
- Median 0.97%
UNHG 135th cheapest of 315 funds
VRTL 315th cheapest of 315 funds
UNHG vs VRTL Dividends
- UNHG
- VRTL None
- UNHG $1.90
- VRTL
- UNHG Dec 30, 2025
- VRTL
- UNHG Jan 2, 2026
- VRTL
- UNHG Irregular
- VRTL
Distribution history
UNHG vs VRTL Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- UNHG 98.1%VRTL 122.5%
- Return per unit of risk
- UNHG 0.90VRTL 1.27
- Worst fall
- UNHG −57.1%VRTL −80.2%
- Market sensitivity
- UNHG 5.53VRTL 4.78
Popular comparisons
- 0.77% · 0.76%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 2.28% · 0.76%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.77% · 0.75%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 2.28% · 0.75%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.77% · 0.76%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 2.28% · 0.76%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.