VGLT ranks 1st and UTWY 7th of 11 funds in the Treasuries (20+ Year) Category.
UTWY vs VGLT
VGLT −0.12pt a year
0.15%0.03%
VGLT 868.1×the volume
3.37K2.93M
VGLT +0.8pt
+3.6%+4.4%
UTWY vs VGLT Performance
−4.0%−4.1%
- UTWY 0.15%
- VGLT 0.03%, better
- UTWY $12M
- VGLT $14.9B
- UTWY −4.0%, better
- VGLT −4.1%
- UTWY 5.32%, better
- VGLT 4.81%
- UTWY 2
- VGLT 104
- UTWY 3.37K sh
- VGLT 2.93M sh, better
- UTWY $40.71
- VGLT $52.49
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | UTWY | VGLT |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | D37 | A92Higher |
| Mission | A100 | A100 |
| Risk | B68Higher | B63 |
| Tradability | C53 | B67Higher |
| Holdings | C53 | A81Higher |
| Durability | F20 | A87Higher |
Rank among Treasuries (20+ Year) funds
Same Category. UTWY and VGLT are both graded against the same 11 Treasuries (20+ Year) funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
UTWYB
VGLTA
In short
UTWY Most long-Treasury funds blend dozens of bonds into one duration smoothie. UTWY aims at a single spot on the curve, tracking the ICE BofA Current 20-Year US Treasury Index, and pays monthly.
VGLT Three basis points for the long end of the Treasury curve. VGLT tracks a market-weighted index of long-dated government bonds, pays income monthly, and charges a fraction of what this category typically costs.
Stated mandate
UTWY The fund seeks, before fees and expenses, to generally match the price and yield performance of the ICE BofA Current 20-Year US Treasury Index.
VGLT The fund seeks to track a market-weighted Treasury index with a long-term dollar-weighted average maturity. It uses index sampling and invests at least 80% of assets in securities included in the target index.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
UTWY vs VGLT Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
UTWY vs VGLT Cost
Overpaying UTWY vs VGLT
$2,499
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
UTWY 0.15%
$3,137
VGLT 0.03%
$638
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | UTWY | VGLT | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $274 | $55 | $219 |
| 20 | $1,071 | $216 | $855 |
| 30 | $3,137 | $638 | $2,499 |
- 0.15%UTWY
- 0.03%VGLT, cheaper
- Middle half of Treasuries (20+ Year) funds
- Median 0.15%
VGLT cheapest of 11 funds
UTWY 6th cheapest of 11 funds
UTWY vs VGLT Dividends
- UTWY 5.32%, better
- VGLT 4.81%
- UTWY $2.16
- VGLT $2.52
- UTWY $0.17
- VGLT $0.21
- UTWY Oct 27, 2026
- VGLT Oct 1, 2026
- UTWY Oct 28, 2026
- VGLT Oct 5, 2026
- UTWY Monthly
- VGLT Monthly
Distribution history
UTWY vs VGLT Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- UTWY 10.9%, betterVGLT 12.3%
- Return per unit of risk
- UTWY −0.03VGLT 0.04, better
- Worst fall
- UTWY −18.2%VGLT −41.0%
- Market sensitivity
- UTWY 1.94VGLT 2.25
UTWY and VGLT in the news
Popular comparisons
- 0.15% · 0.04%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.03% · 0.04%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.15% · 0.05%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.03% · 0.05%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.15% · 0.15%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.03% · 0.15%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.


