XHLF ranks 4th and XBIL 27th of 78 funds in the Cash & Ultra-Short Income Category.
XBIL vs XHLF
XHLF −0.12pt a year
0.15%0.03%
XHLF 3.0×the volume
102K309K
Same figure. Both funds show the same value, so neither comes out ahead.
+4.4%+4.4%
XBIL vs XHLF Performance
+3.7%+3.6%
- XBIL 0.15%
- XHLF 0.03%, better
- XBIL $792M
- XHLF $2.03B
- XBIL +3.7%, better
- XHLF +3.6%
- XBIL 4.00%, better
- XHLF 3.75%
- XBIL 2
- XHLF 29
- XBIL 102K sh
- XHLF 309K sh, better
- XBIL $50.01
- XHLF $50.29
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | XBIL | XHLF |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | B66 | A99Higher |
| Mission | A100 | A100 |
| Risk | C47 | C47 |
| Tradability | C53 | A79Higher |
| Holdings | D36Higher | D35 |
| Durability | B62Higher | B59 |
Rank among Cash & Ultra-Short Income funds
Same Category. XBIL and XHLF are both graded against the same 78 Cash & Ultra-Short Income funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
XBILB
XHLFA
In short
XBIL Most cash-parking ETFs hold a basket of bills. XBIL holds one: the newest 6-month Treasury, rolled every month. Pinpoint exposure to a single spot on the yield curve, in a wrapper that pays monthly.
XHLF Most cash-parking funds pick a maturity bucket. XHLF picks a number: it blends Treasury bills to an average duration of about six months, resets to that target monthly, and charges three basis points to do it.
Stated mandate
XBIL The Fund seeks to track, before fees and expenses, the price and yield performance of the ICE BofA US 6-Month Treasury Bill Index. It is a passively managed ETF.
XHLF The Fund seeks to track the investment results of an index composed of U.S. Treasury securities.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
XBIL vs XHLF Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
XBIL vs XHLF Cost
Overpaying XBIL vs XHLF
$2,499
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
XBIL 0.15%
$3,137
XHLF 0.03%
$638
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | XBIL | XHLF | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $274 | $55 | $219 |
| 20 | $1,071 | $216 | $855 |
| 30 | $3,137 | $638 | $2,499 |
- 0.15%XBIL
- 0.03%XHLF, cheaper
- Middle half of Cash & Ultra-Short Income funds
- Median 0.18%
XHLF cheapest of 78 funds
XBIL 23rd cheapest of 78 funds
XBIL vs XHLF Dividends
- XBIL 4.00%, better
- XHLF 3.75%
- XBIL $2.00
- XHLF $1.89
- XBIL $0.17
- XHLF $0.15
- XBIL Oct 27, 2026
- XHLF Oct 1, 2026
- XBIL Oct 28, 2026
- XHLF Oct 6, 2026
- XBIL Monthly
- XHLF Monthly
Distribution history
XBIL vs XHLF Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- XBIL 0.3%XHLF 0.3%Same figure. Both funds show the same value, so neither comes out ahead.
- Return per unit of risk
- XBIL −0.52XHLF −0.52Same figure. Both funds show the same value, so neither comes out ahead.
- Worst fall
- XBIL −0.1%XHLF −0.1%Same figure. Both funds show the same value, so neither comes out ahead.
- Market sensitivity
- XBIL 0.02XHLF 0.03
Popular comparisons
- 0.15% · 0.08%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.03% · 0.08%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.15% · 0.07%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.03% · 0.07%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.15% · 0.10%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.03% · 0.10%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.