Skip to content

XTR vs ZALT

Global X S&P 500 Tail Risk ETF

XTRCNYSE Arca

Innovator U.S. Equity 10 Buffer ETF - Quarterly

ZALTACboe

Overlap

Expense ratio

XTR −0.44pt a year

XTR0.25%ZALT0.69%

Avg volume · 30D

ZALT 84.1×the volume

XTR1.64KZALT138K

3Y return · a year

XTR +8.6pt

XTR+19.2%ZALT+10.6%

XTR vs ZALT Performance

Oct 31, 2025 – Oct 30, 2026

+7.9%XTR+7.1%ZALT

Oct 31, 2025 to Oct 30, 2026. XTR +7.9%. ZALT +7.1%. Use the arrow keys to read each point.−5%0%10%Oct 2025Apr 2026Oct 2026
Expense ratio
XTR 0.25%, better
ZALT 0.69%
Fund size
XTR $5M
ZALT $840M
1Y total return
XTR +7.9%, better
ZALT +7.1%
Yield (12M)
XTR 16.45%
ZALT No data
Holdings
XTR 506
ZALT 503
Avg volume (30D)
XTR 1.64K sh
ZALT 138K sh, better
NAV per share
XTR $28.54
ZALT $34.50
52W range

ETF.net Grade

XTR: Cost 100, Risk 18, Mission not scored, Tradability 13, Holdings 85, Durability 46. ZALT: Cost 82, Risk 79, Mission 80, Tradability 65, Holdings 90, Durability 61.
Pillar letters and Scores for XTR, ZALT, with each pillar’s weight
PillarXTRZALT
Cost30% weightA100HigherA82
Mission25% weightNot scoredA80
Risk15% weightF18A79Higher
Tradability15% weightF13B65Higher
Holdings10% weightA85A90Higher
Durability5% weightC46B61Higher

Rank among S&P 500 Buffer 9-12% funds

Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

Same Category. XTR and ZALT are both graded against the same 77 S&P 500 Buffer 9-12% funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

S&P 500 Buffer 9-12%⁠

Category · 77 funds
See all 77 ›

ZALT ranks 1st and XTR 57th of 77 funds in the S&P 500 Buffer 9-12% Category.

  1. Rank 1AZALTInnovator U.S. Equity 10 Buffer ETF - QuarterlyScore 77
  2. Rank 2BAUGPPGIM S&P 500 Buffer 12 ETF - AugustScore 67
  3. Rank 57CXIDEFT Vest U.S. Equity Buffer & Premium Income ETF - DecemberScore 40
  4. Rank 57CXTRGlobal X S&P 500 Tail Risk ETFScore 40
  5. Rank 64DJULZTrueshares Structured Outcome (July) ETFScore 39

Our read on each fund

ETF.net Research

XTRCGlobal X S&P 500 Tail Risk ETF

ZALTAInnovator U.S. Equity 10 Buffer ETF - Quarterly

In short

XTR Most downside-protection ETFs sell away your upside to pay for it. XTR pays cash instead: it owns the S&P 500 stocks and buys 10% out-of-the-money puts every quarter, leaving the upside uncapped.

ZALT The defined-outcome trade on a three-month clock: ZALT follows SPY up to a cap and buffers the first 10% of a decline, then resets both every quarter. Four fresh caps a year, at a fee under the shallow-buffer median.

Stated mandate

XTR The Fund seeks to track the performance of the Cboe S&P 500 Tail Risk Index before fees and expenses.

ZALT The fund seeks to follow SPY's return up to a predetermined cap while providing a 10% downside buffer over each three-month outcome period. It may be held indefinitely, with the defined outcomes resetting at the end of each period.

Why people hold it

  • XTR No cap on the gains. The hedge is bought with cash rather than funded by selling calls, so index rallies come through less the put premium and fees.sec.gov
  • Costs 0.25%, well under half of what the defined-outcome funds it competes with typically charge for downside protection.
  • Owns the roughly 500 S&P 500 stocks themselves, with the put position layered on top, rather than wrapping the index in a stack of options.sec.gov
  • Rules-based and mechanical: puts are bought at 10% below the prevailing index level each quarter and held to expiration, with no manager guessing at timing.sec.gov
  • ZALT Resets on a quarterly clock: a new cap is set the first day of each calendar quarter and the 10% buffer starts over. Can be held indefinitely, no rolling into a new ticker.sec.govcboe.com
  • At 0.69% it undercuts the going rate for 10% buffer funds on the S&P 500, where peers like SIXZ, JULT and BJUN charge 0.74% to 0.79%.
  • The cushion is built from FLEX options on SPY itself, so the thing you are hedged against is the same fund most investors already watch.sec.gov
  • Sits among the stronger implementations in its shallow-buffer peer group on cost and ease of trading.

Worth knowing

  • XTR Protection starts about 10% down and resets quarterly, so garden-variety dips are absorbed in full and the gap widens if the market rallies mid-quarter.sec.gov
  • Insurance is not free. The quarterly premium is a steady cost against plain index exposure, and in calm markets the puts expire worthless.sec.gov
  • A small fund that trades thinly, so limit orders matter and subscale products carry more risk of being closed than the category's giants.
  • ZALT Three months of upside buys a lower ceiling. Each quarter's cap is priced off three-month options, so it lands well below what a 12-month buffer fund can offer.sec.gov
  • Buy mid-quarter and you inherit whatever cap and buffer are left, not the full 10%. The prospectus says so plainly.sec.gov
  • The fee comes out of the cushion: with the 0.69% fee counted, the prospectus puts the net buffer at 9.82% per period. No distributions so far, so return shows up in price.sec.gov

Full XTR profile⁠

Full ZALT profile⁠

XTR vs ZALT Holdings

As of
How we measure overlap

Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.

XTR vs ZALT Cost

Overpaying ZALT vs XTR

$8,270

On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.

  • XTR 0.25%

    $5,159

  • ZALT 0.69%

    $13,429

$10,000
30 years

Cost over time

  • XTR 0.25%
  • ZALT 0.69%
  • Overpaying
One line per fund, from year 0 to year 30. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$5K$10K$15K051015202530ZALT $13,429XTR $5,159

Year by year

YearXTRZALTOverpaying
10$455$1,232$777
20$1,769$4,697$2,928
30$5,159$13,429$8,270

Expense ratio

  • 0.25%XTR, cheaper
  • 0.69%ZALT
  • Middle half of S&P 500 Buffer 9-12% funds
  • Median 0.79%

XTR cheapest of 77 funds

ZALT 14th cheapest of 77 funds

XTR vs ZALT Dividends

Last 12 months to Oct 30, 2026
Yield (12M)
XTR 16.45%
ZALT No data
Payout (12M)
XTR $4.69
ZALT None
Last payment
XTR $0.08
ZALT No data
Ex-dividend
XTR Jun 29, 2026
ZALT No data
Paid on
XTR Jul 2, 2026
ZALT No data
Frequency
XTR Twice a year
ZALT No data

Distribution history

Per share, 2021 to 2026, same scale for both

XTRTwice a year · 10 paymentsAll XTR payments⁠
One bar per payment. 10 payments from 2021 to 2026 YTD. Dec 30, 2021 $0.64; Jun 29, 2022 $0.10; Dec 29, 2022 $0.15; Jun 29, 2023 $0.10; Dec 28, 2023 $0.19; Jun 27, 2024 $0.17; Dec 30, 2024 $5.55; Jun 27, 2025 $0.11; Dec 30, 2025 $4.61; Jun 29, 2026 $0.08. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$520232026YTD
ZALTAll ZALT payments⁠

No distribution history available.

XTR vs ZALT Risk

Fall from peak · 5 years

This chart needs five years of history for both funds.

Risk facts

VolatilityStd dev, 3 years
XTR 11.7%ZALT 3.8%, better
Return per unit of riskSharpe ratio, 3 years
XTR 1.19ZALT 1.50, better
Worst fallMax drawdown, 5 years
XTR −20.8%ZALT −8.2%since Oct 2023
Market sensitivityBeta, 5 years
XTR 0.94ZALT 0.29

Popular comparisons

  • XTRCvsAUGPB

    Global X S&P 500 Tail Risk ETF · PGIM S&P 500 Buffer 12 ETF - August

    Expense ratio
    0.25% · 0.50%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • ZALTAvsAUGPB

    Innovator U.S. Equity 10 Buffer ETF - Quarterly · PGIM S&P 500 Buffer 12 ETF - August

    Expense ratio
    0.69% · 0.50%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • XTRCvsTENJB

    Global X S&P 500 Tail Risk ETF · iShares Large Cap 10% Target Buffer Jun ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.25% · 0.53%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • ZALTAvsTENJB

    Innovator U.S. Equity 10 Buffer ETF - Quarterly · iShares Large Cap 10% Target Buffer Jun ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.69% · 0.53%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • XTRCvsSIXJB

    Global X S&P 500 Tail Risk ETF · AllianzIM U.S. Equity 6 Month Buffer10 Jan/Jul ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.25% · 0.74%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • ZALTAvsSIXJB

    Innovator U.S. Equity 10 Buffer ETF - Quarterly · AllianzIM U.S. Equity 6 Month Buffer10 Jan/Jul ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.69% · 0.74%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.