Skip to content

Buyer’s guidesCategory Review

The pricier equal-weight technology fund led the cap-weighted one by 11.6 percentage points

The equal-weight technology fund RSPT returned 48.4% in the year through Thursday, October 8, 2026, 11.6 percentage points ahead of XLK, while the software fund IGV lost 5.2%.

· 3 min read · By ETF.net Research

Rows of illuminated data storage drives glow with blue light in a modern server rack.

Key takeaways

  • The equal-weight technology fund led by 11.6 percentage points.
  • Nvidia, Apple and Microsoft together were 39.6% of XLK.
  • The biggest holdings lagged the rest of the sector.
  • A software fund lost money while technology funds rose.

In the year through October 8, 2026, a fund that holds S&P 500 technology companies at equal weight, RSPT, returned 48.4%, including dividends. XLK, which tracks the Technology Select Sector Index, returned 36.8%. The gap is 11.6 percentage points.

The Technology Select Sector Index is the technology sector of the S&P 500, weighted so the biggest companies take the most room. XLK charges 0.08% a year. RSPT charges 0.4%, five times that fee, and it resets each company's weight every quarter. The two funds hold nearly the same companies.

A fund that holds the S&P 500, SPY, returned 16.2%. A fund built to own North American software, IGV, lost 5.2%.

The twelve-month figures below include dividends. The third-quarter column is the change in the share price from the end of June to the end of September, without dividends.

What the fund holdsPast year, with dividendsThird quarter, share price
S&P 500 technology companies, equal weight, RSPT48.4%2.1%
Technology sector, weighted by size, XLK36.8%2.7%
North American software, IGV−5.2%17.5%
The S&P 500, SPY16.2%2.1%

The biggest holdings lagged

From the end of 2025 to June 30, XLK's share price rose 32.3%. RSPT's rose 41.7%. SPY rose 9.5%.

Over those same months, Nvidia's share price rose 7.3% and Apple's rose 6.4%. Microsoft's fell 22.9%.

Microsoft fell 22.9% while equal-weight technology rose 41.7%

Share-price change, Dec. 31, 2025 to June 30, 2026

  • RSPT+42%
  • XLK+32%
  • SPY+9.5%
  • NVDA+7.3%
  • AAPL+6.4%
  • MSFT−23%

Nvidia and Apple also trailed XLK, RSPT and the S&P 500.

As of October 8, Nvidia, Apple and Microsoft together were 39.6% of XLK. RSPT holds 75 companies and starts each quarter with each one near 1.3% of the fund. A holder had much less of the three that lagged, and much more of the other technology companies in the sector.

Nvidia was 15.6% of XLK and 1.3% of RSPT

Holdings as of October 8, 2026

  • XLK
  • RSPT
  • NVDA
    • XLK 16%
    • RSPT 1.3%
  • AAPL
    • XLK 13%
    • RSPT 1.3%
  • MSFT
    • XLK 11%
    • RSPT 1.3%

Apple 13.3% and Microsoft 10.7% of XLK, each 1.3% of RSPT.

Those weights are current, not the weights from January. Microsoft's fall means it was a larger share of XLK in the first half than it is now. Equal weight still would not have put close to 40% of the fund in those three names. It resets every company to the same size each quarter.

A software fund lost money

IGV is not the software inside XLK. XLK's issuer, as of October 7, put 24% of that fund in software. IGV holds North American software companies, plus some firms in interactive home entertainment and interactive media. It does not hold Nvidia or Apple.

Palo Alto Networks, the largest holding in IGV, was 9.4% of that fund and 1.8% of XLK. Palantir was 9.3% of IGV and 2.5% of XLK.

From the end of 2025 to June 30, IGV's share price fell 14.3%. From late January to an April low, an S&P 500 index of software and services stocks lost more than 26%, on fears that companies would use AI to build software themselves, more cheaply.

Rebecca Wettemann, chief executive of the research firm Valoir, said that shift did not happen anywhere near as fast as some of the people on Wall Street thought. Vendors, she said, were reporting customer uptake as AI adoption moved beyond the experimental stage.

From the end of June to the end of September, IGV's share price rose 17.5%. Microsoft rose 37.5%. On July 29, Microsoft said it expected to keep generating cash through the fiscal year that had just started.

The quarter's rise still left IGV down for the twelve months.

Between RSPT and XLK, equal weight held far less of Nvidia, Apple and Microsoft and far more of the other companies in the sector. The higher fee did not close that gap.

ETFs in this story

BRSPTInvesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Technology ETF68/100AXLKState Street Technology Select Sector SPDR ETF81/100BIGViShares Expanded Tech-Software Sector ETF55/100ASPYState Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF71/100

Frequently asked questions

What did the equal-weight and cap-weighted funds return?

In the year through October 8, 2026, RSPT returned 48.4% and XLK returned 36.8%, including dividends.

Why did equal weight beat the cap-weighted fund?

It held far less of Nvidia, Apple and Microsoft and far more of the other companies in the sector.

How much more does the equal-weight fund charge?

RSPT charges 0.4% a year, five times the 0.08% that XLK charges.

How did the software fund do?

IGV, a fund built to own North American software, lost 5.2% over that year.

Related articles