Skip to content

AAAU vs FGDL

Goldman Sachs Physical Gold ETF

AAAUBCboe

Franklin Responsibly Sourced Gold ETF

FGDLBNYSE Arca

Overlap

0.0%by weight

Expense ratio

FGDL −0.03pt a year

AAAU 0.18%FGDL 0.15%

Avg volume · 30D

AAAU 82.8×the volume

AAAU 1.53MFGDL 18.4K

3Y return · a year

FGDL +0.1pt

AAAU +29.0%FGDL +29.1%

AAAU vs FGDL Performance

Oct 13, 2025 – Oct 13, 2026

+1.1%AAAU+0.8%FGDL

Oct 13, 2025 to Oct 13, 2026. AAAU +1.1%. FGDL +0.8%. Use the arrow keys to read each point.10%20%30%Oct 2025Apr 2026Oct 2026
Expense ratio
AAAU 0.18%
FGDL 0.15%, better
Fund size
AAAU $2.66B
FGDL $433M
1Y total return
AAAU +1.1%, better
FGDL +0.8%
Holdings
AAAU 1
FGDL 1
Avg volume (30D)
AAAU 1.53M sh, better
FGDL 18.4K sh
NAV per share
AAAU $41.11
FGDL $55.48
52W range

ETF.net Grade

AAAU: Cost 59, Risk 49, Mission 100, Tradability 46, Holdings not scored, Durability 41. FGDL: Cost 77, Risk 49, Mission 100, Tradability 23, Holdings not scored, Durability 32.
Pillar letters and Scores for AAAU, FGDL, with each pillar’s weight
PillarAAAUFGDL
Cost30% weightB59A77Higher
Mission25% weightA100A100
Risk15% weightC49C49
Tradability15% weightC46HigherF23
Holdings10% weightNot scoredNot scored
Durability5% weightC41HigherD32

Rank among Physical Gold funds

Same Category. AAAU and FGDL are both graded against the same 10 Physical Gold funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

Physical Gold⁠

Category · 10 funds
See all 10 ›

FGDL ranks 3rd and AAAU 5th of 10 funds in the Physical Gold Category.

  1. Rank 1AGLDMSPDR Gold MiniShares TrustScore 81
  2. Rank 2AIAUMiShares Gold Trust MicroScore 77
  3. Rank 3BFGDLFranklin Responsibly Sourced Gold ETFScore 67
  4. Rank 4BSGOLabrdn Physical Gold Shares ETFScore 66
  5. Rank 5BAAAUGoldman Sachs Physical Gold ETFScore 65
  6. Rank 5BBARGraniteShares Gold TrustScore 65

Our read on each fund

ETF.net Research

AAAUBGoldman Sachs Physical Gold ETF

FGDLBFranklin Responsibly Sourced Gold ETF

In short

AAAU Goldman's bullion box. AAAU holds physical gold and its shares are built to reflect the metal's price minus a 0.18% fee. No manager, no strategy, no index games. Open since 2018 and now a multi-billion-dollar trust.

FGDL Gold in a vault, with two twists: the bars come with Franklin's responsible-sourcing label, and the fund charges nothing to hold them. Assets are bullion and cash, full stop.

Stated mandate

AAAU The Shares are designed to reflect the price of gold, less the Trust’s operating expenses. The Trust is not actively managed.

FGDL The Fund seeks to track the price of gold bullion, after deducting expenses. Its assets consist only of gold bullion and cash, if any.

Why people hold it

  • AAAU One job, plainly done: the trust holds physical gold and its shares are designed to reflect gold's price less operating expenses. Not actively managed.
  • A multi-billion-dollar, actively traded fund, the kind of scale and turnover that helps keep the share price tethered to the bullion behind it.
  • Trading since 2018 with Goldman Sachs as sponsor: an established wrapper, not a recent launch hoping to gather assets.
  • FGDL A 0.00% expense ratio in a cohort whose median is 0.17%. Even the cheap giants charge something (GLDM 0.10%, IAUM 0.09%, GLD 0.40%).
  • Simple plumbing: a grantor trust that holds gold bullion and cash and tracks the metal's price after expenses. No futures, no swaps, no miners.
  • The responsible-sourcing standard is the pitch in a group where every fund owns the same metal, and Franklin spells it out in the trust's own filings.
  • Does what it says: mandate, wrapper and holdings all line up, and it sits in the upper half of the physical gold cohort.

Worth knowing

  • AAAU Not the cheapest bullion on the shelf. GLDM and IAUM charge roughly a tenth of a percent and FGDL runs at zero, against 0.18% here.
  • No income here. The trust has paid no distributions, so the entire result rides on the metal's price.
  • Expenses come off the top: shares reflect gold's price less the trust's costs, a small ongoing drag that compounds the longer you hold.
  • FGDL Thinly traded next to the category's heavyweights, which can mean wider bid/ask spreads on the way in and out.
  • Bullion pays no income, and the fund makes no distributions. The gold price, less costs, is the whole story.
  • Launched in 2022 and far smaller than the decade-old gold trusts, so the track record is short by cohort standards.

Full AAAU profile⁠

Full FGDL profile⁠

AAAU vs FGDL Holdings

Overlap

0.0%by weight

Only AAAU
1
of 1
In both
0
holdings
Only FGDL
1
of 1

Holdings side by side

Top 10 holdings by combined weight
HoldingAAAUFGDL
Gold Oz.Gold Oz.Not held100.02%
Physical GoldPhysical Gold100.00%Not held

All AAAU holdings⁠All 2 FGDL holdings⁠

AAAU vs FGDL Cost

Expense ratio

  • 0.18%AAAU
  • 0.15%FGDL, cheaper
  • Middle half of Physical Gold funds
  • Median 0.17%

2 of 10 Physical Gold funds charge less than FGDL

5 of 10 charge less than AAAU

$612less in fees with FGDL over 30 years, on $10,000 invested

$0$1,000$2,000$3,000$4,000$5,000Start10 years20 years30 years

Assumes $10,000 invested once and 7% growth a year before fees.

AAAU vs FGDL Dividends

Last 12 months to Oct 13, 2026
Payout (12M)
AAAU: None
FGDL: None

Distribution history

AAAUAll AAAU payments⁠

No distribution history available.

FGDLAll FGDL payments⁠

No distribution history available.

AAAU vs FGDL Risk

Fall from peak · 5 years

This chart needs five years of history for both funds.

Risk facts

VolatilityStd dev, 3 years
AAAU 18.9%, betterFGDL 19.1%
Return per unit of riskSharpe ratio, 3 years
AAAU 1.29, betterFGDL 1.28
Worst fallMax drawdown, 5 years
AAAU −26.3%, betterFGDL −26.6%since Jun 2022
Market sensitivityBeta, 3 years
AAAU 0.31FGDL 0.41

Popular comparisons