Skip to content

AAAU vs SGOL

Goldman Sachs Physical Gold ETF

AAAUBCboe

abrdn Physical Gold Shares ETF

SGOLBNYSE Arca

Overlap

100.0%by weight

Expense ratio

SGOL −0.01pt a year

AAAU 0.18%SGOL 0.17%

Avg volume · 30D

SGOL 1.7×the volume

AAAU 1.53MSGOL 2.52M

5Y return · a year

SGOL +0.1pt

AAAU +18.1%SGOL +18.2%

AAAU vs SGOL Performance

Oct 13, 2025 – Oct 13, 2026

+1.1%AAAU+1.1%SGOL

Oct 13, 2025 to Oct 13, 2026. AAAU +1.1%. SGOL +1.1%. Use the arrow keys to read each point.10%20%30%Oct 2025Apr 2026Oct 2026
Expense ratio
AAAU 0.18%
SGOL 0.17%, better
Fund size
AAAU $2.66B
SGOL $7.18B
1Y total return
AAAU +1.1%
SGOL +1.1%
Holdings
AAAU 1
SGOL 1
Avg volume (30D)
AAAU 1.53M sh
SGOL 2.52M sh, better
NAV per share
AAAU $41.11
SGOL $39.84
52W range

ETF.net Grade

AAAU: Cost 59, Risk 49, Mission 100, Tradability 46, Holdings not scored, Durability 41. SGOL: Cost 59, Risk 49, Mission 100, Tradability 43, Holdings not scored, Durability 62.
Pillar letters and Scores for AAAU, SGOL, with each pillar’s weight
PillarAAAUSGOL
Cost30% weightB59B59
Mission25% weightA100A100
Risk15% weightC49C49
Tradability15% weightC46HigherC43
Holdings10% weightNot scoredNot scored
Durability5% weightC41B62Higher

Rank among Physical Gold funds

Same Category. AAAU and SGOL are both graded against the same 10 Physical Gold funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

Physical Gold⁠

Category · 10 funds
See all 10 ›

SGOL ranks 4th and AAAU 5th of 10 funds in the Physical Gold Category.

  1. Rank 1AGLDMSPDR Gold MiniShares TrustScore 81
  2. Rank 2AIAUMiShares Gold Trust MicroScore 77
  3. Rank 3BFGDLFranklin Responsibly Sourced Gold ETFScore 67
  4. Rank 4BSGOLabrdn Physical Gold Shares ETFScore 66
  5. Rank 5BAAAUGoldman Sachs Physical Gold ETFScore 65
  6. Rank 5BBARGraniteShares Gold TrustScore 65

Our read on each fund

ETF.net Research

AAAUBGoldman Sachs Physical Gold ETF

SGOLBabrdn Physical Gold Shares ETF

In short

AAAU Goldman's bullion box. AAAU holds physical gold and its shares are built to reflect the metal's price minus a 0.18% fee. No manager, no strategy, no index games. Open since 2018 and now a multi-billion-dollar trust.

SGOL A 2009-vintage trust that owns actual gold bars and does exactly one job: track bullion's price after a 0.17% fee. Middle of the pack on cost, front of the pack on doing what the prospectus says.

Stated mandate

AAAU The Shares are designed to reflect the price of gold, less the Trust’s operating expenses. The Trust is not actively managed.

SGOL The Trust seeks to track the price of physical gold bullion, after deducting its expenses.

Why people hold it

  • AAAU One job, plainly done: the trust holds physical gold and its shares are designed to reflect gold's price less operating expenses. Not actively managed.
  • A multi-billion-dollar, actively traded fund, the kind of scale and turnover that helps keep the share price tethered to the bullion behind it.
  • Trading since 2018 with Goldman Sachs as sponsor: an established wrapper, not a recent launch hoping to gather assets.
  • SGOL Plain plumbing: a grantor trust holding physical bullion, with one job written into its own documents, to track the price of gold after deducting expenses.
  • Tracks the metal about as closely as the wrapper allows, one of the cleanest mandate implementations among physical gold funds.
  • Trading since 2009, through several full gold cycles, and now a multi-billion-dollar fund that changes hands actively.

Worth knowing

  • AAAU Not the cheapest bullion on the shelf. GLDM and IAUM charge roughly a tenth of a percent and FGDL runs at zero, against 0.18% here.
  • No income here. The trust has paid no distributions, so the entire result rides on the metal's price.
  • Expenses come off the top: shares reflect gold's price less the trust's costs, a small ongoing drag that compounds the longer you hold.
  • SGOL Cost sits at the category median: 0.17% a year, while IAUM (0.09%) and GLDM (0.10%) charge less to hold the same metal.
  • Bullion throws off no income. This is a price-of-gold holding, not a cash-flow one, and the fee comes out of trust assets.
  • One metal, no diversification. The shares go where gold goes, including the long flat stretches and sharp drawdowns.

Full AAAU profile⁠

Full SGOL profile⁠

AAAU vs SGOL Holdings

Holdings as of Oct 8, 2026

Overlap

100.0%by weight

Only AAAU
0
of 1
In both
1
holdings
Only SGOL
0
of 1

Holdings side by side

Top 10 holdings by combined weight
HoldingAAAUSGOL
Physical GoldPhysical Gold100.00%100.00%

All AAAU holdings⁠All SGOL holdings⁠

AAAU vs SGOL Cost

Expense ratio

  • 0.18%AAAU
  • 0.17%SGOL, cheaper
  • Middle half of Physical Gold funds
  • Median 0.17%

3 of 10 Physical Gold funds charge less than SGOL

5 of 10 charge less than AAAU

$203less in fees with SGOL over 30 years, on $10,000 invested

$0$1,000$2,000$3,000$4,000$5,000Start10 years20 years30 years

Assumes $10,000 invested once and 7% growth a year before fees.

AAAU vs SGOL Dividends

Last 12 months to Oct 13, 2026
Payout (12M)
AAAU: None
SGOL: None

Distribution history

AAAUAll AAAU payments⁠

No distribution history available.

SGOLAll SGOL payments⁠

No distribution history available.

AAAU vs SGOL Risk

Fall from peak · 5 years

  • AAAU
  • SGOL
Oct 13, 2021 to Oct 13, 2026. Worst fall: SGOL −26.3% · Jul 2026. Use the arrow keys to read each point.−25%−20%−15%−10%−5%0%Oct 2021Apr 2024Oct 2026

Risk facts

VolatilityStd dev, 3 years
AAAU 18.9%SGOL 18.9%=
Return per unit of riskSharpe ratio, 3 years
AAAU 1.29SGOL 1.29=
Worst fallMax drawdown, 5 years
AAAU −26.3%SGOL −26.3%=
Market sensitivityBeta, 3 years
AAAU 0.31SGOL 0.40

AAAU and SGOL in the news

Popular comparisons