PANG ranks 3rd and AAPB 44th of 315 funds in the Single-Stock Long Leveraged Category.
AAPB vs PANG
PANG −0.45pt a year
1.21%0.76%
AAPB 1.1×the volume
50.5K44.6K
AAPB vs PANG Performance
+43.5%+91.6%
- AAPB 1.21%
- PANG 0.76%, better
- AAPB $18M
- PANG $9M
- AAPB +43.5%
- PANG +91.6%, better
- AAPB 3.06%
- PANG
- AAPB 2
- PANG 4
- AAPB 50.5K sh, better
- PANG 44.6K sh
- AAPB $47.21
- PANG $31.31
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | AAPB | PANG |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | D37 | A70Higher |
| Mission | A78 | A94Higher |
| Risk | A80Higher | A74 |
| Tradability | A78Higher | A74 |
| Holdings | ||
| Durability | A75Higher | B59 |
Rank among Single-Stock Long Leveraged funds
Same Category. AAPB and PANG are both graded against the same 315 Single-Stock Long Leveraged funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
AAPBB
PANGA
In short
AAPB A day-one member of the US single-stock leverage club: listed August 2022 at 1.75x Apple, raised to 2x in January 2024. It aims to deliver twice Apple's daily move, then resets the clock every night.
PANG Palo Alto Networks, doubled. PANG aims for 200% of PANW's daily move, reset every day, and it reached the market days before the only other 2x PANW fund. Flat 0.76% fee, no waiver attached.
Stated mandate
AAPB The Fund seeks daily investment results, before fees and expenses, equal to twice the daily percentage change of Apple’s common stock.
PANG The ETF seeks daily investment results, before fees and expenses, equal to 200% of the daily performance of Palo Alto Networks, Inc. stock.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
AAPB vs PANG Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
AAPB vs PANG Cost
Overpaying AAPB vs PANG
$7,349
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
AAPB 1.21%
$22,005
PANG 0.76%
$14,656
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | AAPB | PANG | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $2,115 | $1,353 | $762 |
| 20 | $7,873 | $5,142 | $2,731 |
| 30 | $22,005 | $14,656 | $7,349 |
- 1.21%AAPB
- 0.76%PANG, cheaper
- Middle half of Single-Stock Long Leveraged funds
- Median 0.97%
PANG 131st cheapest of 315 funds
AAPB 226th cheapest of 315 funds
AAPB vs PANG Dividends
- AAPB 3.06%
- PANG
- AAPB $1.41
- PANG
- AAPB $1.41
- PANG $1.30
- AAPB Dec 29, 2025
- PANG Dec 30, 2025
- AAPB Dec 31, 2025
- PANG Jan 2, 2026
- AAPB Irregular
- PANG Irregular
Distribution history
AAPB vs PANG Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- AAPB 42.5%PANG 128.2%
- Return per unit of risk
- AAPB 0.83PANG 0.90
- Worst fall
- AAPB −58.1%PANG −62.4%
- Market sensitivity
- AAPB 1.82PANG 3.32
Popular comparisons
- 1.21% · 0.76%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.76% · 0.76%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 1.21% · 0.77%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.76% · 0.77%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 1.21% · 0.75%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.76% · 0.75%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.