AAPD ranks 1st and APLZ 28th of 43 funds in the Single-Stock Inverse Category.
AAPD vs APLZ
AAPD −0.53pt a year
0.96%1.49%
AAPD 65.7×the volume
8.8M134K
AAPD vs APLZ Performance
−9.9%+44.0%
- AAPD 0.96%, better
- APLZ 1.49%
- AAPD $24M
- APLZ $5M
- AAPD −21.5%
- APLZ
- AAPD 4.51%
- APLZ
- AAPD 4
- APLZ 2
- AAPD 8.8M sh, better
- APLZ 134K sh
- AAPD $9.86
- APLZ $35.31
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | AAPD | APLZ |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | A97Higher | D25 |
| Mission | A85 | A97Higher |
| Risk | A75Higher | C40 |
| Tradability | A80Higher | D38 |
| Holdings | ||
| Durability | A75Higher | D32 |
Rank among Single-Stock Inverse funds
Same Category. AAPD and APLZ are both graded against the same 43 Single-Stock Inverse funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
AAPDA
APLZC
In short
AAPD The straight-shooting short on Apple. No 2x, no options overlay: AAPD aims to deliver 100% of the inverse of AAPL's daily move, and it charges less than the typical single-stock bear fund to do it.
APLZ A one-day trade in a fund wrapper: APLZ aims to deliver two times the inverse of Applied Digital's daily move, so bears can lean against the AI data-center story without a margin account or a stock loan.
Stated mandate
AAPD The fund seeks daily investment results, before fees and expenses, equal to 100% of the inverse of the performance of Apple Inc.'s common shares.
APLZ The fund seeks daily results equal to two times the inverse performance of Applied Digital Corporation common shares, before fees and expenses. It is designed for a one-trading-day objective rather than a longer holding period.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
AAPD vs APLZ Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
AAPD vs APLZ Cost
Overpaying APLZ vs AAPD
$8,107
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
AAPD 0.96%
$18,034
APLZ 1.49%
$26,141
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | AAPD | APLZ | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $1,695 | $2,574 | $879 |
| 20 | $6,383 | $9,464 | $3,081 |
| 30 | $18,034 | $26,141 | $8,107 |
- 0.96%AAPD, cheaper
- 1.49%APLZ
- Middle half of Single-Stock Inverse funds
- Median 1.05%
AAPD 3rd cheapest of 43 funds
APLZ 31st cheapest of 43 funds
AAPD vs APLZ Dividends
- AAPD 4.51%
- APLZ
- AAPD $0.45
- APLZ None
- AAPD $0.18
- APLZ
- AAPD Sep 22, 2026
- APLZ
- AAPD Sep 29, 2026
- APLZ
- AAPD Quarterly
- APLZ
Distribution history
AAPD vs APLZ Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- AAPD 19.8%APLZ
- Return per unit of risk
- AAPD −1.32APLZ
- Worst fall
- AAPD −63.9%APLZ
- Market sensitivity
- AAPD −0.84APLZ −5.76
Popular comparisons
- 0.96% · 0.98%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 1.49% · 0.98%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.96% · 0.75%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 1.49% · 0.75%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.96% · 0.95%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 1.49% · 0.95%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.