AAPD ranks 1st and AMZD 5th of 43 funds in the Single-Stock Inverse Category.
AAPD vs AMZD
AAPD −0.06pt a year
0.96%1.02%
AMZD 1.4×the volume
8.8M12.2M
AMZD +0.8pt
−21.3%−20.5%
AAPD vs AMZD Performance
−21.5%−3.4%
- AAPD 0.96%, better
- AMZD 1.02%
- AAPD $24M
- AMZD $19M
- AAPD −21.5%
- AMZD −3.4%, better
- AAPD 4.51%, better
- AMZD 2.65%
- AAPD 4
- AMZD 3
- AAPD 8.8M sh
- AMZD 12.2M sh, better
- AAPD $9.86
- AMZD $8.90
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | AAPD | AMZD |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | A97Higher | A78 |
| Mission | A85 | A96Higher |
| Risk | A75Higher | A72 |
| Tradability | A80Higher | A72 |
| Holdings | ||
| Durability | A75Higher | A74 |
Rank among Single-Stock Inverse funds
Same Category. AAPD and AMZD are both graded against the same 43 Single-Stock Inverse funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
AAPDA
AMZDA
In short
AAPD The straight-shooting short on Apple. No 2x, no options overlay: AAPD aims to deliver 100% of the inverse of AAPL's daily move, and it charges less than the typical single-stock bear fund to do it.
AMZD Most single-stock bear funds reach for leverage. AMZD skips it: one dollar down for every dollar Amazon rises, for a single trading day, through swaps you buy like any share. 1.02% net of a waiver through September 1, 2027.
Stated mandate
AAPD The fund seeks daily investment results, before fees and expenses, equal to 100% of the inverse of the performance of Apple Inc.'s common shares.
AMZD The fund seeks daily inverse investment results tied to AMZN and is materially different from ordinary exchange-traded funds.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
AAPD vs AMZD Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
AAPD vs AMZD Cost
Overpaying AMZD vs AAPD
$978
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
AAPD 0.96%
$18,034
AMZD 1.02%
$19,012
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | AAPD | AMZD | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $1,695 | $1,797 | $102 |
| 20 | $6,383 | $6,746 | $363 |
| 30 | $18,034 | $19,012 | $978 |
- 0.96%AAPD, cheaper
- 1.02%AMZD
- Middle half of Single-Stock Inverse funds
- Median 1.05%
AAPD 3rd cheapest of 43 funds
AMZD 12th cheapest of 43 funds
AAPD vs AMZD Dividends
- AAPD 4.51%, better
- AMZD 2.65%
- AAPD $0.45
- AMZD $0.24
- AAPD $0.18
- AMZD $0.05
- AAPD Sep 22, 2026
- AMZD Sep 22, 2026
- AAPD Sep 29, 2026
- AMZD Sep 29, 2026
- AAPD Quarterly
- AMZD Quarterly
Distribution history
AAPD vs AMZD Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- AAPD 19.8%, betterAMZD 27.4%
- Return per unit of risk
- AAPD −1.32AMZD −0.86, better
- Worst fall
- AAPD −63.9%AMZD −74.7%
- Market sensitivity
- AAPD −0.84AMZD −1.26
Popular comparisons
- 0.96% · 0.98%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 1.02% · 0.98%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.96% · 0.75%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 1.02% · 0.75%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.96% · 0.95%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 1.02% · 0.95%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.