AAPD ranks 1st and AVS 7th of 43 funds in the Single-Stock Inverse Category.
AAPD vs AVS
AAPD −0.07pt a year
0.96%1.03%
AVS 1.3×the volume
8.8M11.7M
AAPD vs AVS Performance
−21.5%−2.9%
- AAPD 0.96%, better
- AVS 1.03%
- AAPD $24M
- AVS $20M
- AAPD −21.5%
- AVS −2.9%, better
- AAPD 4.51%, better
- AVS 3.07%
- AAPD 4
- AVS 4
- AAPD 8.8M sh
- AVS 11.7M sh, better
- AAPD $9.86
- AVS $8.32
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | AAPD | AVS |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | A97Higher | B69 |
| Mission | A85 | A100Higher |
| Risk | A75Higher | A72 |
| Tradability | A80Higher | A75 |
| Holdings | ||
| Durability | A75Higher | B68 |
Rank among Single-Stock Inverse funds
Same Category. AAPD and AVS are both graded against the same 43 Single-Stock Inverse funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
AAPDA
AVSA
In short
AAPD The straight-shooting short on Apple. No 2x, no options overlay: AAPD aims to deliver 100% of the inverse of AAPL's daily move, and it charges less than the typical single-stock bear fund to do it.
AVS A one-ticker short on Broadcom. AVS aims for -100% of AVGO's daily move, no margin account or borrowed shares involved, at 1.03% net of a waiver through September 1, 2027.
Stated mandate
AAPD The fund seeks daily investment results, before fees and expenses, equal to 100% of the inverse of the performance of Apple Inc.'s common shares.
AVS The fund seeks daily investment results equal to 100% of the inverse performance of Broadcom Inc.'s common shares, before fees and expenses.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
AAPD vs AVS Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
AAPD vs AVS Cost
Overpaying AVS vs AAPD
$1,139
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
AAPD 0.96%
$18,034
AVS 1.03%
$19,173
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | AAPD | AVS | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $1,695 | $1,814 | $119 |
| 20 | $6,383 | $6,807 | $424 |
| 30 | $18,034 | $19,173 | $1,139 |
- 0.96%AAPD, cheaper
- 1.03%AVS
- Middle half of Single-Stock Inverse funds
- Median 1.05%
AAPD 3rd cheapest of 43 funds
AVS 18th cheapest of 43 funds
AAPD vs AVS Dividends
- AAPD 4.51%, better
- AVS 3.07%
- AAPD $0.45
- AVS $0.27
- AAPD $0.18
- AVS $0.04
- AAPD Sep 22, 2026
- AVS Sep 22, 2026
- AAPD Sep 29, 2026
- AVS Sep 29, 2026
- AAPD Quarterly
- AVS Quarterly
Distribution history
AAPD vs AVS Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- AAPD 19.8%AVS 45.2%
- Return per unit of risk
- AAPD −1.32AVS −1.00
- Worst fall
- AAPD −63.9%AVS −75.7%
- Market sensitivity
- AAPD −0.84AVS −1.48
AAPD and AVS in the news
Popular comparisons
- 0.96% · 0.98%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 1.03% · 0.98%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.96% · 0.75%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 1.03% · 0.75%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.96% · 0.95%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 1.03% · 0.95%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
