AAPD ranks 1st and IONZ 25th of 43 funds in the Single-Stock Inverse Category.
AAPD vs IONZ
0.0%by weight
AAPD −0.95pt a year
0.96%1.91%
AAPD 5.5×the volume
8.8M1.6M
AAPD vs IONZ Performance
−20.1%−80.0%
- AAPD 0.96%, better
- IONZ 1.91%
- AAPD $35M
- IONZ $11M
- AAPD −20.1%, better
- IONZ −80.0%
- AAPD 4.43%
- IONZ
- AAPD 5
- IONZ 3
- AAPD 8.8M sh, better
- IONZ 1.6M sh
- AAPD $9.98
- IONZ $36.42
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | AAPD | IONZ |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | A97Higher | F4 |
| Mission | A85 | A90Higher |
| Risk | A75Higher | D29 |
| Tradability | A79Higher | C44 |
| Holdings | ||
| Durability | A79Higher | C51 |
Rank among Single-Stock Inverse funds
Same Category. AAPD and IONZ are both graded against the same 43 Single-Stock Inverse funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
AAPDA
IONZC
In short
AAPD The straight-shooting short on Apple. No 2x, no options overlay: AAPD aims to deliver 100% of the inverse of AAPL's daily move, and it charges less than the typical single-stock bear fund to do it.
IONZ One ticker, one trade: IONZ aims for -2x the daily move in IonQ, the quantum-computing pure play, using swaps instead of a margin account. The clock resets every day, and its 1.91% fee runs above the category norm.
Stated mandate
AAPD The fund seeks daily investment results, before fees and expenses, equal to 100% of the inverse of the performance of Apple Inc.'s common shares.
IONZ The Fund seeks daily inverse investment results equal to -2 times the daily percentage change in IonQ Inc.'s share price.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
AAPD vs IONZ Holdings
How AAPD and IONZ differ
0.0%
Shared holdings make up 0.0% of AAPD and 0.0% of IONZ.
Level by level
- Holdings0.0%
Sector
No Sector split for AAPD and IONZ.
Country, concentration and asset class
Country
No country split for AAPD.
Concentration
- AAPD333.3%
- IONZ300.3%
- AAPD0
- IONZ2
Asset class
- AAPD
- Leveraged/Inverse
- IONZ
- Leveraged/Inverse
Holdings
- Only in AAPD0
- In both0
- Only in IONZ2
Only in AAPD
0 securities, 0.0% of AAPD by weight
Only in IONZ
2 securities, 16.3% of IONZ by weight
- United States Treasury Bill 11/19/202615.16%
- First American Government Obligations Fund 12/01/20311.16%
Weight gaps
AAPD and IONZ share no securities.
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
AAPD vs IONZ Cost
Overpaying IONZ vs AAPD
$13,744
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
AAPD 0.96%
$18,034
IONZ 1.91%
$31,778
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | AAPD | IONZ | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $1,695 | $3,242 | $1,547 |
| 20 | $6,383 | $11,705 | $5,322 |
| 30 | $18,034 | $31,778 | $13,744 |
- 0.96%AAPD, cheaper
- 1.91%IONZ
- Middle half of Single-Stock Inverse funds
- Median 1.05%
AAPD 3rd cheapest of 43 funds
IONZ 41st cheapest of 43 funds
AAPD vs IONZ Dividends
- AAPD 4.43%
- IONZ
- AAPD $0.45
- IONZ None
- AAPD $0.18
- IONZ
- AAPD Sep 22, 2026
- IONZ
- AAPD Sep 29, 2026
- IONZ
- AAPD Quarterly
- IONZ
Distribution history
AAPD vs IONZ Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- AAPD 19.8%IONZ 165.7%
- Return per unit of risk
- AAPD −1.32IONZ −0.47
- Worst fall
- AAPD −63.9%IONZ −98.7%
- Market sensitivity
- AAPD −0.84IONZ −9.59
Popular comparisons
- 0.96% · 0.98%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 1.91% · 0.98%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.96% · 0.95%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 1.91% · 0.95%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.96% · 1.02%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 1.91% · 1.02%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.