AAPD ranks 1st and MSFD 8th of 43 funds in the Single-Stock Inverse Category.
AAPD vs MSFD
100%by weight
AAPD −0.06pt a year
0.96%1.02%
AAPD 5.4×the volume
8.8M1.62M
MSFD +7.1pt
−21.3%−14.2%
AAPD vs MSFD Performance
−21.5%−6.2%
- AAPD 0.96%, better
- MSFD 1.02%
- AAPD $24M
- MSFD $10M
- AAPD −21.5%
- MSFD −6.2%, better
- AAPD 4.51%, better
- MSFD 4.24%
- AAPD 4
- MSFD 3
- AAPD 8.8M sh, better
- MSFD 1.62M sh
- AAPD $9.86
- MSFD $9.67
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | AAPD | MSFD |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | A97Higher | A78 |
| Mission | A85 | A99Higher |
| Risk | A75 | A82Higher |
| Tradability | A80Higher | C41 |
| Holdings | ||
| Durability | A75Higher | B66 |
Rank among Single-Stock Inverse funds
Same Category. AAPD and MSFD are both graded against the same 43 Single-Stock Inverse funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
AAPDA
MSFDA
In short
AAPD The straight-shooting short on Apple. No 2x, no options overlay: AAPD aims to deliver 100% of the inverse of AAPL's daily move, and it charges less than the typical single-stock bear fund to do it.
MSFD Straight inverse Microsoft, with no leverage stacked on top: MSFD targets -100% of MSFT's daily move. One of Direxion's original 2022 single-stock funds, and a buy-side way to express a bearish view.
Stated mandate
AAPD The fund seeks daily investment results, before fees and expenses, equal to 100% of the inverse of the performance of Apple Inc.'s common shares.
MSFD The fund seeks daily investment results, before fees and expenses, that correspond to the inverse performance of Microsoft Corporation's common shares.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
AAPD vs MSFD Holdings
How AAPD and MSFD differ
100%
Shared holdings make up 100% of MSFD and 100% of AAPD.
Level by level
Sector
No Sector split for AAPD and MSFD.
Country, concentration and asset class
Country
No country split for AAPD and MSFD.
Concentration
- AAPD490.0%
- MSFD12979.7%
- AAPD2
- MSFD1
Asset class
- AAPD
- Leveraged/Inverse
- MSFD
- Leveraged/Inverse
Holdings
- Only in AAPD1
- In both1
- Only in MSFD0
Only in AAPD
1 security, 15.7% of AAPD by weight
- Goldman Sachs Fin Gov 465 Institut15.66%
Only in MSFD
0 securities, 0.0% of MSFD by weight
Weight gaps
All 1 Holdings in both funds, largest gap first.
| Holding | More in AAPDMore in MSFD | AAPD | MSFD |
|---|---|---|---|
| Goldman Finl Sq Trsry Inst 506 | MSFD +1659.16 points | 86.03% | 1745.19% |
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
AAPD vs MSFD Cost
Overpaying MSFD vs AAPD
$978
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
AAPD 0.96%
$18,034
MSFD 1.02%
$19,012
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | AAPD | MSFD | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $1,695 | $1,797 | $102 |
| 20 | $6,383 | $6,746 | $363 |
| 30 | $18,034 | $19,012 | $978 |
- 0.96%AAPD, cheaper
- 1.02%MSFD
- Middle half of Single-Stock Inverse funds
- Median 1.05%
AAPD 3rd cheapest of 43 funds
MSFD 12th cheapest of 43 funds
AAPD vs MSFD Dividends
- AAPD 4.51%, better
- MSFD 4.24%
- AAPD $0.45
- MSFD $0.42
- AAPD $0.18
- MSFD $0.08
- AAPD Sep 22, 2026
- MSFD Sep 22, 2026
- AAPD Sep 29, 2026
- MSFD Sep 29, 2026
- AAPD Quarterly
- MSFD Quarterly
Distribution history
AAPD vs MSFD Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- AAPD 19.8%, betterMSFD 27.6%
- Return per unit of risk
- AAPD −1.32MSFD −0.57, better
- Worst fall
- AAPD −63.9%MSFD −62.1%
- Market sensitivity
- AAPD −0.84MSFD −1.16
Popular comparisons
- 0.96% · 0.98%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 1.02% · 0.98%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.96% · 0.75%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 1.02% · 0.75%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.96% · 0.95%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 1.02% · 0.95%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.