AAPD ranks 1st and NBIZ 39th of 43 funds in the Single-Stock Inverse Category.
AAPD vs NBIZ
AAPD −0.53pt a year
0.96%1.49%
AAPD 4.1×the volume
8.8M2.13M
AAPD vs NBIZ Performance
−9.9%−50.2%
- AAPD 0.96%, better
- NBIZ 1.49%
- AAPD $24M
- NBIZ $30M
- AAPD −21.5%
- NBIZ
- AAPD 4.51%
- NBIZ
- AAPD 4
- NBIZ 3
- AAPD 8.8M sh, better
- NBIZ 2.13M sh
- AAPD $9.86
- NBIZ $37.95
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | AAPD | NBIZ |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | A97Higher | D25 |
| Mission | A85 | |
| Risk | A75Higher | F21 |
| Tradability | A80Higher | C50 |
| Holdings | ||
| Durability | A75Higher | C52 |
Rank among Single-Stock Inverse funds
Same Category. AAPD and NBIZ are both graded against the same 43 Single-Stock Inverse funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
AAPDA
NBIZD
In short
AAPD The straight-shooting short on Apple. No 2x, no options overlay: AAPD aims to deliver 100% of the inverse of AAPL's daily move, and it charges less than the typical single-stock bear fund to do it.
NBIZ A one-ticker short on Nebius. NBIZ aims to deliver two times the inverse of NBIS's move over a single trading day, then resets. A trader's instrument in an ETF wrapper, not a position you set and forget.
Stated mandate
AAPD The fund seeks daily investment results, before fees and expenses, equal to 100% of the inverse of the performance of Apple Inc.'s common shares.
NBIZ The Fund seeks daily investment results equal to two times the inverse of NBIS’s performance, before fees and expenses. The objective applies only to a single trading day.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
AAPD vs NBIZ Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
AAPD vs NBIZ Cost
Overpaying NBIZ vs AAPD
$8,107
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
AAPD 0.96%
$18,034
NBIZ 1.49%
$26,141
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | AAPD | NBIZ | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $1,695 | $2,574 | $879 |
| 20 | $6,383 | $9,464 | $3,081 |
| 30 | $18,034 | $26,141 | $8,107 |
- 0.96%AAPD, cheaper
- 1.49%NBIZ
- Middle half of Single-Stock Inverse funds
- Median 1.05%
AAPD 3rd cheapest of 43 funds
NBIZ 31st cheapest of 43 funds
AAPD vs NBIZ Dividends
- AAPD 4.51%
- NBIZ
- AAPD $0.45
- NBIZ None
- AAPD $0.18
- NBIZ
- AAPD Sep 22, 2026
- NBIZ
- AAPD Sep 29, 2026
- NBIZ
- AAPD Quarterly
- NBIZ
Distribution history
AAPD vs NBIZ Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- AAPD 19.8%NBIZ
- Return per unit of risk
- AAPD −1.32NBIZ
- Worst fall
- AAPD −63.9%NBIZ
- Market sensitivity
- AAPD −0.84NBIZ −1.73
Popular comparisons
- 0.96% · 0.98%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 1.49% · 0.98%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.96% · 0.75%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 1.49% · 0.75%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.96% · 0.95%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 1.49% · 0.95%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.