AAPD ranks 1st and NFXS 28th of 43 funds in the Single-Stock Inverse Category.
AAPD vs NFXS
AAPD −0.07pt a year
0.96%1.03%
AAPD 390.7×the volume
8.8M22.5K
AAPD vs NFXS Performance
−21.5%+69.4%
- AAPD 0.96%, better
- NFXS 1.03%
- AAPD $24M
- NFXS $3M
- AAPD −21.5%
- NFXS +69.4%, better
- AAPD 4.51%, better
- NFXS 2.16%
- AAPD 4
- NFXS 4
- AAPD 8.8M sh, better
- NFXS 22.5K sh
- AAPD $9.86
- NFXS $24.19
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | AAPD | NFXS |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | A97Higher | B69 |
| Mission | A85 | A97Higher |
| Risk | A75 | A96Higher |
| Tradability | A80Higher | D25 |
| Holdings | ||
| Durability | A75Higher | C51 |
Rank among Single-Stock Inverse funds
Same Category. AAPD and NFXS are both graded against the same 43 Single-Stock Inverse funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
AAPDA
NFXSC
In short
AAPD The straight-shooting short on Apple. No 2x, no options overlay: AAPD aims to deliver 100% of the inverse of AAPL's daily move, and it charges less than the typical single-stock bear fund to do it.
NFXS Shorting Netflix without a margin account or a borrow: NFXS aims to deliver 100% of the inverse of NFLX's one-day move. Direxion runs the bull side of this pair at 2x and the bear side at 1x, so it's a straight short, not an amplified one.
Stated mandate
AAPD The fund seeks daily investment results, before fees and expenses, equal to 100% of the inverse of the performance of Apple Inc.'s common shares.
NFXS The fund seeks daily investment results equal to 100% of the inverse of Netflix common shares' performance, before fees and expenses.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
AAPD vs NFXS Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
AAPD vs NFXS Cost
Overpaying NFXS vs AAPD
$1,139
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
AAPD 0.96%
$18,034
NFXS 1.03%
$19,173
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | AAPD | NFXS | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $1,695 | $1,814 | $119 |
| 20 | $6,383 | $6,807 | $424 |
| 30 | $18,034 | $19,173 | $1,139 |
- 0.96%AAPD, cheaper
- 1.03%NFXS
- Middle half of Single-Stock Inverse funds
- Median 1.05%
AAPD 3rd cheapest of 43 funds
NFXS 18th cheapest of 43 funds
AAPD vs NFXS Dividends
- AAPD 4.51%, better
- NFXS 2.16%
- AAPD $0.45
- NFXS $0.52
- AAPD $0.18
- NFXS $0.13
- AAPD Sep 22, 2026
- NFXS Sep 22, 2026
- AAPD Sep 29, 2026
- NFXS Sep 29, 2026
- AAPD Quarterly
- NFXS Quarterly
Distribution history
AAPD vs NFXS Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- AAPD 19.8%NFXS 37.5%
- Return per unit of risk
- AAPD −1.32NFXS 0.21
- Worst fall
- AAPD −63.9%NFXS −50.4%
- Market sensitivity
- AAPD −0.84NFXS −0.29
Popular comparisons
- 0.96% · 0.98%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 1.03% · 0.98%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.96% · 0.75%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 1.03% · 0.75%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.96% · 0.95%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 1.03% · 0.95%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.