AAPD ranks 1st and NVD 14th of 43 funds in the Single-Stock Inverse Category.
AAPD vs NVD
AAPD −0.34pt a year
0.96%1.30%
NVD 9.5×the volume
8.8M83.8M
AAPD +58.3pt
−21.3%−79.6%
AAPD vs NVD Performance
−21.5%−30.9%
- AAPD 0.96%, better
- NVD 1.30%
- AAPD $24M
- NVD $60M
- AAPD −21.5%, better
- NVD −30.9%
- AAPD 4.51%
- NVD 19.09%, better
- AAPD 4
- NVD 1
- AAPD 8.8M sh
- NVD 83.8M sh, better
- AAPD $9.86
- NVD $4.08
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | AAPD | NVD |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | A97Higher | B55 |
| Mission | A85 | A99Higher |
| Risk | A75Higher | C40 |
| Tradability | A80 | A84Higher |
| Holdings | ||
| Durability | A75 | A76Higher |
Rank among Single-Stock Inverse funds
Same Category. AAPD and NVD are both graded against the same 43 Single-Stock Inverse funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
AAPDA
NVDA
In short
AAPD The straight-shooting short on Apple. No 2x, no options overlay: AAPD aims to deliver 100% of the inverse of AAPL's daily move, and it charges less than the typical single-stock bear fund to do it.
NVD The original two-for-one bear trade on NVIDIA. NVD aims for -2x NVDA's move each day, then resets at the close, and it changes hands constantly. Built for single sessions, not long holds.
Stated mandate
AAPD The fund seeks daily investment results, before fees and expenses, equal to 100% of the inverse of the performance of Apple Inc.'s common shares.
NVD The fund seeks daily investment results, before fees and expenses, equal to -2 times the daily percentage change in NVIDIA Corp. (NASDAQ: NVDA).
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
AAPD vs NVD Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
AAPD vs NVD Cost
Overpaying NVD vs AAPD
$5,335
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
AAPD 0.96%
$18,034
NVD 1.30%
$23,369
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | AAPD | NVD | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $1,695 | $2,263 | $568 |
| 20 | $6,383 | $8,393 | $2,010 |
| 30 | $18,034 | $23,369 | $5,335 |
- 0.96%AAPD, cheaper
- 1.30%NVD
- Middle half of Single-Stock Inverse funds
- Median 1.05%
AAPD 3rd cheapest of 43 funds
NVD 26th cheapest of 43 funds
AAPD vs NVD Dividends
- AAPD 4.51%
- NVD 19.09%, better
- AAPD $0.45
- NVD $0.85
- AAPD $0.18
- NVD $0.85
- AAPD Sep 22, 2026
- NVD Dec 29, 2025
- AAPD Sep 29, 2026
- NVD Dec 31, 2025
- AAPD Quarterly
- NVD Annual
Distribution history
AAPD vs NVD Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- AAPD 19.8%, betterNVD 59.9%
- Return per unit of risk
- AAPD −1.32, betterNVD −2.23
- Worst fall
- AAPD −63.9%NVD −99.4%
- Market sensitivity
- AAPD −0.84NVD −2.90
Popular comparisons
- 0.96% · 0.98%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 1.30% · 0.98%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.96% · 0.75%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 1.30% · 0.75%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.96% · 0.95%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 1.30% · 0.95%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.