AAPD ranks 1st and NVDD 10th of 43 funds in the Single-Stock Inverse Category.
AAPD vs NVDD
AAPD −0.05pt a year
0.96%1.01%
AAPD 47.6×the volume
9.21M194K
AAPD +25.6pt
−20.0%−45.6%
AAPD vs NVDD Performance
−23.7%−2.0%
- AAPD 0.96%, better
- NVDD 1.01%
- AAPD $46M
- NVDD $21M
- AAPD −23.7%
- NVDD −2.0%, better
- AAPD 4.60%, better
- NVDD 3.75%
- AAPD 4
- NVDD 4
- AAPD 9.21M sh, better
- NVDD 194K sh
- AAPD $10.02
- NVDD $34.81
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | AAPD | NVDD |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | A97Higher | A78 |
| Mission | A85 | A90Higher |
| Risk | A72Higher | B58 |
| Tradability | A73Higher | D38 |
| Holdings | ||
| Durability | A81Higher | A74 |
Rank among Single-Stock Inverse funds
Same Category. AAPD and NVDD are both graded against the same 43 Single-Stock Inverse funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
AAPDA
NVDDA
In short
AAPD The straight-shooting short on Apple. No 2x, no options overlay: AAPD aims to deliver 100% of the inverse of AAPL's daily move, and it charges less than the typical single-stock bear fund to do it.
NVDD A straight one-for-one short on NVIDIA that resets every trading day: no 2x amplifier, no margin account, no hunting for borrowable shares. It also undercuts the other inverse-NVDA ETF on fees.
Stated mandate
AAPD The fund seeks daily investment results, before fees and expenses, equal to 100% of the inverse of the performance of Apple Inc.'s common shares.
NVDD The fund seeks daily investment results, before fees and expenses, equal to 100% of the inverse performance of NVIDIA Corporation common shares.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
AAPD vs NVDD Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
AAPD vs NVDD Cost
Overpaying NVDD vs AAPD
$816
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
AAPD 0.96%
$18,034
NVDD 1.01%
$18,850
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | AAPD | NVDD | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $1,695 | $1,780 | $85 |
| 20 | $6,383 | $6,686 | $303 |
| 30 | $18,034 | $18,850 | $816 |
- 0.96%AAPD, cheaper
- 1.01%NVDD
- Middle half of Single-Stock Inverse funds
- Median 1.05%
AAPD 3rd cheapest of 43 funds
NVDD 10th cheapest of 43 funds
AAPD vs NVDD Dividends
- AAPD 4.60%, better
- NVDD 3.75%
- AAPD $0.45
- NVDD $1.36
- AAPD $0.18
- NVDD $0.49
- AAPD Sep 22, 2026
- NVDD Sep 22, 2026
- AAPD Sep 29, 2026
- NVDD Sep 29, 2026
- AAPD Quarterly
- NVDD Quarterly
Distribution history
AAPD vs NVDD Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- AAPD 19.8%, betterNVDD 32.7%
- Return per unit of risk
- AAPD −1.32, betterNVDD −2.03
- Worst fall
- AAPD −64.2%NVDD −89.6%
- Market sensitivity
- AAPD −0.84NVDD −1.72
Popular comparisons
- 0.96% · 0.98%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 1.01% · 0.98%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.96% · 0.95%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 1.01% · 0.95%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.96% · 1.02%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 1.01% · 1.02%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.