AAPD ranks 1st and PALD 27th of 43 funds in the Single-Stock Inverse Category.
AAPD vs PALD
AAPD −0.06pt a year
0.96%1.02%
AAPD 84.4×the volume
9.21M109K
AAPD vs PALD Performance
−23.7%−47.6%
- AAPD 0.96%, better
- PALD 1.02%
- AAPD $46M
- PALD $4M
- AAPD −23.7%, better
- PALD −47.6%
- AAPD 4.60%
- PALD 4.95%, better
- AAPD 4
- PALD 4
- AAPD 9.21M sh, better
- PALD 109K sh
- AAPD $10.02
- PALD $11.37
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | AAPD | PALD |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | A97Higher | A78 |
| Mission | A85 | A93Higher |
| Risk | A72Higher | C48 |
| Tradability | A73Higher | D29 |
| Holdings | ||
| Durability | A81Higher | C52 |
Rank among Single-Stock Inverse funds
Same Category. AAPD and PALD are both graded against the same 43 Single-Stock Inverse funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
AAPDA
PALDC
In short
AAPD The straight-shooting short on Apple. No 2x, no options overlay: AAPD aims to deliver 100% of the inverse of AAPL's daily move, and it charges less than the typical single-stock bear fund to do it.
PALD Short Palo Alto Networks in one ticker. PALD targets -100% of PANW's move each trading day, held through swaps rather than borrowed shares, with no leverage stacked on top. A one-day tool by design.
Stated mandate
AAPD The fund seeks daily investment results, before fees and expenses, equal to 100% of the inverse of the performance of Apple Inc.'s common shares.
PALD The fund seeks daily investment results equal to 100% of the inverse performance of Palo Alto Networks, Inc. common shares, before fees and expenses.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
AAPD vs PALD Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
AAPD vs PALD Cost
Overpaying PALD vs AAPD
$978
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
AAPD 0.96%
$18,034
PALD 1.02%
$19,012
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | AAPD | PALD | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $1,695 | $1,797 | $102 |
| 20 | $6,383 | $6,746 | $363 |
| 30 | $18,034 | $19,012 | $978 |
- 0.96%AAPD, cheaper
- 1.02%PALD
- Middle half of Single-Stock Inverse funds
- Median 1.05%
AAPD 3rd cheapest of 43 funds
PALD 12th cheapest of 43 funds
AAPD vs PALD Dividends
- AAPD 4.60%
- PALD 4.95%, better
- AAPD $0.45
- PALD $0.53
- AAPD $0.18
- PALD $0.10
- AAPD Sep 22, 2026
- PALD Sep 22, 2026
- AAPD Sep 29, 2026
- PALD Sep 29, 2026
- AAPD Quarterly
- PALD Quarterly
Distribution history
AAPD vs PALD Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- AAPD 19.8%PALD 46.1%
- Return per unit of risk
- AAPD −1.32PALD −1.16
- Worst fall
- AAPD −64.2%PALD −70.9%
- Market sensitivity
- AAPD −0.84PALD −1.01
Popular comparisons
- 0.96% · 0.98%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 1.02% · 0.98%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.96% · 0.95%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 1.02% · 0.95%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.96% · 1.02%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 1.02% · 1.02%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.