AAPD ranks 1st and PLTZ 18th of 43 funds in the Single-Stock Inverse Category.
AAPD vs PLTZ
AAPD −0.35pt a year
0.96%1.31%
AAPD 2.5×the volume
8.8M3.5M
AAPD vs PLTZ Performance
−21.5%−65.6%
- AAPD 0.96%, better
- PLTZ 1.31%
- AAPD $24M
- PLTZ $31M
- AAPD −21.5%, better
- PLTZ −65.6%
- AAPD 4.51%
- PLTZ
- AAPD 4
- PLTZ 3
- AAPD 8.8M sh, better
- PLTZ 3.5M sh
- AAPD $9.86
- PLTZ $7.74
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | AAPD | PLTZ |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | A97Higher | C49 |
| Mission | A85 | A95Higher |
| Risk | A75Higher | C50 |
| Tradability | A80Higher | B64 |
| Holdings | ||
| Durability | A75Higher | B65 |
Rank among Single-Stock Inverse funds
Same Category. AAPD and PLTZ are both graded against the same 43 Single-Stock Inverse funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
AAPDA
PLTZB
In short
AAPD The straight-shooting short on Apple. No 2x, no options overlay: AAPD aims to deliver 100% of the inverse of AAPL's daily move, and it charges less than the typical single-stock bear fund to do it.
PLTZ Palantir's double-dose bear trade. PLTZ aims for two times the inverse of PLTR's daily move using swaps and options, with a daily reset that makes it a short-horizon tool rather than a set-and-forget short.
Stated mandate
AAPD The fund seeks daily investment results, before fees and expenses, equal to 100% of the inverse of the performance of Apple Inc.'s common shares.
PLTZ The Fund seeks daily investment results equal to two times the inverse of the daily percentage change in Palantir Technologies Inc. common stock, using swaps and/or listed options.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
AAPD vs PLTZ Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
AAPD vs PLTZ Cost
Overpaying PLTZ vs AAPD
$5,485
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
AAPD 0.96%
$18,034
PLTZ 1.31%
$23,519
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | AAPD | PLTZ | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $1,695 | $2,280 | $585 |
| 20 | $6,383 | $8,450 | $2,067 |
| 30 | $18,034 | $23,519 | $5,485 |
- 0.96%AAPD, cheaper
- 1.31%PLTZ
- Middle half of Single-Stock Inverse funds
- Median 1.05%
AAPD 3rd cheapest of 43 funds
PLTZ 27th cheapest of 43 funds
AAPD vs PLTZ Dividends
- AAPD 4.51%
- PLTZ
- AAPD $0.45
- PLTZ None
- AAPD $0.18
- PLTZ
- AAPD Sep 22, 2026
- PLTZ
- AAPD Sep 29, 2026
- PLTZ
- AAPD Quarterly
- PLTZ
Distribution history
AAPD vs PLTZ Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- AAPD 19.8%PLTZ 109.7%
- Return per unit of risk
- AAPD −1.32PLTZ −0.72
- Worst fall
- AAPD −63.9%PLTZ −91.0%
- Market sensitivity
- AAPD −0.84PLTZ −1.36
Popular comparisons
- 0.96% · 0.98%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 1.31% · 0.98%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.96% · 0.75%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 1.31% · 0.75%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.96% · 0.95%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 1.31% · 0.95%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.