AAPD ranks 1st and TSLQ 10th of 43 funds in the Single-Stock Inverse Category.
AAPD vs TSLQ
AAPD −0.19pt a year
0.96%1.15%
AAPD 1.5×the volume
8.8M6.03M
AAPD +50.2pt
−21.3%−71.5%
AAPD vs TSLQ Performance
−21.5%−22.7%
- AAPD 0.96%, better
- TSLQ 1.15%
- AAPD $24M
- TSLQ $103M
- AAPD −21.5%, better
- TSLQ −22.7%
- AAPD 4.51%
- TSLQ 12.98%, better
- AAPD 4
- TSLQ 3
- AAPD 8.8M sh, better
- TSLQ 6.03M sh
- AAPD $9.86
- TSLQ $14.78
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | AAPD | TSLQ |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | A97Higher | B61 |
| Mission | A85 | A97Higher |
| Risk | A75Higher | C54 |
| Tradability | A80 | A90Higher |
| Holdings | ||
| Durability | A75Higher | A73 |
Rank among Single-Stock Inverse funds
Same Category. AAPD and TSLQ are both graded against the same 43 Single-Stock Inverse funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
AAPDA
TSLQA
In short
AAPD The straight-shooting short on Apple. No 2x, no options overlay: AAPD aims to deliver 100% of the inverse of AAPL's daily move, and it charges less than the typical single-stock bear fund to do it.
TSLQ A 2022-vintage Tesla bear. TSLQ holds swaps built to move twice the inverse of Tesla's daily change, then resets the clock each session. Fee: 1.15% net of a waiver through July 31, 2027.
Stated mandate
AAPD The fund seeks daily investment results, before fees and expenses, equal to 100% of the inverse of the performance of Apple Inc.'s common shares.
TSLQ The fund seeks daily investment results equal to two times the inverse performance of Tesla's common stock, before fees and expenses.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
AAPD vs TSLQ Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
AAPD vs TSLQ Cost
Overpaying TSLQ vs AAPD
$3,043
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
AAPD 0.96%
$18,034
TSLQ 1.15%
$21,077
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | AAPD | TSLQ | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $1,695 | $2,015 | $320 |
| 20 | $6,383 | $7,521 | $1,138 |
| 30 | $18,034 | $21,077 | $3,043 |
- 0.96%AAPD, cheaper
- 1.15%TSLQ
- Middle half of Single-Stock Inverse funds
- Median 1.05%
AAPD 3rd cheapest of 43 funds
TSLQ 23rd cheapest of 43 funds
AAPD vs TSLQ Dividends
- AAPD 4.51%
- TSLQ 12.98%, better
- AAPD $0.45
- TSLQ $1.92
- AAPD $0.18
- TSLQ $1.92
- AAPD Sep 22, 2026
- TSLQ Dec 22, 2025
- AAPD Sep 29, 2026
- TSLQ Dec 26, 2025
- AAPD Quarterly
- TSLQ Annual
Distribution history
AAPD vs TSLQ Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- AAPD 19.8%, betterTSLQ 92.7%
- Return per unit of risk
- AAPD −1.32TSLQ −0.88, better
- Worst fall
- AAPD −63.9%TSLQ −99.0%
- Market sensitivity
- AAPD −0.84TSLQ −1.96
Popular comparisons
- 0.96% · 0.98%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 1.15% · 0.98%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.96% · 0.75%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 1.15% · 0.75%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.96% · 0.95%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 1.15% · 0.95%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.