DFLV ranks 4th and ABEQ 52nd of 64 funds in the US Active Value Category.
ABEQ vs DFLV
DFLV −0.64pt a year
0.85%0.21%
DFLV 59.4×the volume
11.1K658K
DFLV +7.9pt
+14.8%+22.7%
ABEQ vs DFLV Performance
+14.1%+29.3%
- ABEQ 0.85%
- DFLV 0.21%, better
- ABEQ $148M
- DFLV $7.39B
- ABEQ +14.1%
- DFLV +29.3%, better
- ABEQ 1.16%
- DFLV 1.35%, better
- ABEQ 24
- DFLV 336
- ABEQ 11.1K sh
- DFLV 658K sh, better
- ABEQ $38.95
- DFLV $41.80
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | ABEQ | DFLV |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | F8 | A92Higher |
| Mission | ||
| Risk | B63 | A76Higher |
| Tradability | C53 | A83Higher |
| Holdings | F14 | A78Higher |
| Durability | B59 | A83Higher |
Rank among US Active Value funds
Same Category. ABEQ and DFLV are both graded against the same 64 US Active Value funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
ABEQD
DFLVA
In short
ABEQ A stock picker in a cohort full of rules-based screens. ABEQ hunts US companies trading at deep discounts to its subadviser's estimate of fair value, aiming at positive absolute returns rather than shadowing a value benchmark.
DFLV Dimensional's value playbook in an ETF wrapper: large-cap value that also screens for profitability, spread across roughly 300 names, run by research rather than an index. Active by design, index-fund cheap in practice.
Stated mandate
ABEQ The Fund seeks positive absolute returns through active management of primarily U.S. equity securities selected for substantial discounts to the subadviser’s estimate of fair value.
DFLV The ETF seeks long-term capital appreciation. Its investment approach combines research, portfolio design, portfolio management, and trading, emphasizing long-term expected-return drivers and broad diversification.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
ABEQ vs DFLV Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
ABEQ vs DFLV Cost
Overpaying ABEQ vs DFLV
$11,842
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
ABEQ 0.85%
$16,199
DFLV 0.21%
$4,357
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | ABEQ | DFLV | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $1,508 | $383 | $1,125 |
| 20 | $5,706 | $1,491 | $4,215 |
| 30 | $16,199 | $4,357 | $11,842 |
- 0.85%ABEQ
- 0.21%DFLV, cheaper
- Middle half of US Active Value funds
- Median 0.54%
DFLV 6th cheapest of 64 funds
ABEQ 58th cheapest of 64 funds
ABEQ vs DFLV Dividends
- ABEQ 1.16%
- DFLV 1.35%, better
- ABEQ $0.45
- DFLV $0.57
- ABEQ $0.23
- DFLV $0.16
- ABEQ Jun 26, 2026
- DFLV Sep 22, 2026
- ABEQ Jul 1, 2026
- DFLV Sep 24, 2026
- ABEQ Twice a year
- DFLV Quarterly
Distribution history
ABEQ vs DFLV Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- ABEQ 10.9%, betterDFLV 12.3%
- Return per unit of risk
- ABEQ 0.93DFLV 1.38, better
- Worst fall
- ABEQ −17.3%DFLV −16.8%
- Market sensitivity
- ABEQ 0.26DFLV 0.80
Popular comparisons
- 0.85% · 0.15%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.21% · 0.15%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.85% · 0.12%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.21% · 0.12%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.85% · 0.15%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.21% · 0.15%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.