WTV ranks 1st and ABEQ 52nd of 64 funds in the US Active Value Category.
ABEQ vs WTV
WTV −0.73pt a year
0.85%0.12%
WTV 15.1×the volume
11.1K167K
WTV +4.8pt
+8.9%+13.7%
ABEQ vs WTV Performance
+53.0%+89.6%
- ABEQ 0.85%
- WTV 0.12%, better
- ABEQ $148M
- WTV $3.33B
- ABEQ +14.1%
- WTV +20.9%, better
- ABEQ 1.16%
- WTV 2.00%, better
- ABEQ 24
- WTV 126
- ABEQ 11.1K sh
- WTV 167K sh, better
- ABEQ $38.95
- WTV $106.90
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | ABEQ | WTV |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | F8 | A100Higher |
| Mission | ||
| Risk | B63Higher | B56 |
| Tradability | C53 | A89Higher |
| Holdings | F14 | A84Higher |
| Durability | B59 | A90Higher |
Rank among US Active Value funds
Same Category. ABEQ and WTV are both graded against the same 64 US Active Value funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
ABEQD
WTVA
In short
ABEQ A stock picker in a cohort full of rules-based screens. ABEQ hunts US companies trading at deep discounts to its subadviser's estimate of fair value, aiming at positive absolute returns rather than shadowing a value benchmark.
WTV Most value funds shop for low price tags. WTV shops for cash coming back to shareholders: dividends plus net buybacks, filtered for quality and profitability. Actively run, priced like an index fund at 0.12%.
Stated mandate
ABEQ The Fund seeks positive absolute returns through active management of primarily U.S. equity securities selected for substantial discounts to the subadviser’s estimate of fair value.
WTV The fund seeks income and capital appreciation through primarily U.S. equities selected for high total shareholder yield and favorable relative quality characteristics.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
ABEQ vs WTV Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
ABEQ vs WTV Cost
Overpaying ABEQ vs WTV
$13,679
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
ABEQ 0.85%
$16,199
WTV 0.12%
$2,520
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | ABEQ | WTV | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $1,508 | $220 | $1,288 |
| 20 | $5,706 | $859 | $4,847 |
| 30 | $16,199 | $2,520 | $13,679 |
- 0.85%ABEQ
- 0.12%WTV, cheaper
- Middle half of US Active Value funds
- Median 0.54%
WTV cheapest of 64 funds
ABEQ 58th cheapest of 64 funds
ABEQ vs WTV Dividends
- ABEQ 1.16%
- WTV 2.00%, better
- ABEQ $0.45
- WTV $2.14
- ABEQ $0.23
- WTV $0.55
- ABEQ Jun 26, 2026
- WTV Sep 25, 2026
- ABEQ Jul 1, 2026
- WTV Sep 29, 2026
- ABEQ Twice a year
- WTV Quarterly
Distribution history
ABEQ vs WTV Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
- ABEQ
- WTV
Risk facts
- Volatility
- ABEQ 10.9%, betterWTV 13.7%
- Return per unit of risk
- ABEQ 0.93WTV 1.33, better
- Worst fall
- ABEQ −17.3%, betterWTV −19.3%
- Market sensitivity
- ABEQ 0.26WTV 0.94
Popular comparisons
- 0.85% · 0.15%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.12% · 0.15%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.85% · 0.15%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.12% · 0.15%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.85% · 0.21%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.12% · 0.21%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.