ABOT vs JQUA: Grades, Fees and Holdings Compared

Abacus FCF Innovation Leaders ETF

ABOTDCboe

JPMorgan U.S. Quality Factor ETF

JQUAANYSE Arca

Overlap

18.4%by weight

Expense ratio

JQUA −0.27pt a year

ABOT0.39%JQUA0.12%

Avg volume · 30D

JQUA 1521.7×the volume

ABOT423JQUA644K

5Y return · a year

JQUA +4.0pt

ABOT+8.6%JQUA+12.6%

ABOT vs JQUA Performance

Nov 9, 2021 – Nov 9, 2026

+50.7%ABOT+80.7%JQUA

Expense ratio: ABOT 0.39%; JQUA 0.12%, better
Fund size: ABOT $4M; JQUA $9.49B
1Y total return: ABOT +9.3%; JQUA +22.8%, better
Yield (12M): ABOT 0.27%; JQUA 1.06%, better
Holdings: ABOT 52; JQUA 310
Avg volume (30D): ABOT 423 sh; JQUA 644K sh, better
NAV per share: ABOT $42.47; JQUA $73.35
52W range

ETF.net Grade

Pillar letters and Scores for ABOT, JQUA, with each pillar’s weight
Pillar	ABOT	JQUA
Cost30% weight	C44	A100Higher
Mission25% weight	F18	A80Higher
Risk15% weight	F16	A76Higher
Tradability15% weight	F18	B56Higher
Holdings10% weight	B57	A83Higher
Durability5% weight	F24	A75Higher

Rank among US Quality Index funds

How we build Categories ›

Same Category. ABOT and JQUA are both graded against the same 26 US Quality Index funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

US Quality Index⁠

Category · 26 funds

See all 26 ›

JQUA ranks 1st and ABOT 24th of 26 funds in the US Quality Index Category.

Rank 1AJQUAJPMorgan U.S. Quality Factor ETFScore 81
Rank 2AQUALiShares MSCI USA Quality Factor ETFScore 77
Rank 23DEMOTFirst Trust S&P 500 Economic Moat ETFScore 31
Rank 24DABOTAbacus FCF Innovation Leaders ETFScore 29
Rank 25FOWNCorgi Inside Ownership 100 ETFScore 23

Our read on each fund

ETF.net Research

ABOTDAbacus FCF Innovation Leaders ETF

JQUAAJPMorgan U.S. Quality Factor ETF

In short

ABOT No data

JQUA Quality investing without the quality price tag. JQUA screens U.S. companies for profitability and strong balance-sheet traits, and charges 0.12%, the lowest fee in the quality-factor group we track.

Stated mandate

ABOT No data

JQUA JQUA is designed to provide domestic equity exposure focused on companies with strong quality and profitability characteristics, using a rules-based approach intended to enhance returns.

Why people hold it

ABOT No data

JQUA 0.12% a year, against a roughly 0.29% median for quality-factor funds, and it undercuts the bigger badges QUAL and FQAL at 0.15%.
About 300 U.S. names selected on quality and profitability: a broad core-shaped sleeve, not a concentrated wager on a dozen balance sheets.
Live since 2017 and now a multi-billion-dollar, actively traded fund, so it has both a real track record and daily two-way flow.
One of the stronger implementations in its peer group: it stays close to the JP Morgan US Quality Factor Index it follows while keeping costs at the bottom of the group.

Worth knowing

ABOT No data

JQUA A quality screen is a tilt, not a shield. Owning profitable companies means owning less of everything else, and that gap cuts both ways.
Trades actively, though it is not the most heavily traded fund on the quality-factor shelf, which matters more for large orders than small ones.
Distributions land quarterly and fall out of what the screen owns. Income is a byproduct here, not the mandate.

Full ABOT profile⁠

Full JQUA profile⁠

ABOT vs JQUA Holdings

How ABOT and JQUA differ

Overlap by weight

18.4%

Shared holdings make up 89.0% of ABOT and 18.4% of JQUA.

Level by level

Holdings42 in both18.4%
Sector11 Sectors65.1%
Countryby domicile95.8%
Asset classStocks100%

Sector

Sector weights in ABOT and JQUA, widest gap first
Sector	Gap	ABOT	JQUA
Technology	ABOT +27.3 points	64.8%	37.5%
Financials	JQUA +14.0 points	0.0%	14.0%
Health Care	ABOT +7.6 points	17.5%	9.9%
Consumer Staples	JQUA +5.8 points	0.0%	5.8%
Industrials	JQUA +4.1 points	3.9%	8.0%
Energy	JQUA +3.8 points	0.0%	3.8%
Real Estate	JQUA +2.3 points	0.0%	2.3%
Materials	JQUA +1.6 points	0.0%	1.6%
Consumer Discretionary	JQUA +1.5 points	8.6%	10.1%
Utilities	JQUA +1.1 points	0.0%	1.1%
Communication	JQUA +0.4 points	5.3%	5.7%

Country, concentration and asset class

Country by domicile

Country weights in ABOT and JQUA, widest gap first
Country	Gap	ABOT	JQUA
United States	JQUA +3.7 points	95.8%	99.5%
Australia	ABOT +2.4 points	2.4%	0.0%
Sweden	ABOT +1.8 points	1.8%	0.0%
Switzerland	JQUA +0.5 points	0.0%	0.5%

Concentration

Weight in the 10 largest Holdings

ABOT33.6%
JQUA18.5%

Securities held

ABOT51
JQUA308

Asset class

ABOT: Stocks
JQUA: Stocks

Holdings

Only in ABOT9
In both42
Only in JQUA266

Only in ABOT

9 securities, 11.0% of ABOT by weight

ROBLOX Corp2.70%
Rockwell Automation Inc1.52%
Fair Isaac Corp1.49%
Halozyme Therapeutics Inc1.35%
DraftKings Inc1.12%
Alnylam Pharmaceuticals Inc0.98%
Gitlab Inc0.89%
Qualys Inc0.83%
Us Bank Mmda - Usbgfs 9 09/01/20370.14%

Only in JQUA

266 securities, 81.5% of JQUA by weight

Microsoft Corp Common2.15%
Visa Inc Common Stock USD2.01%
Berkshire Hathaway Inc1.87%
Exxonmobil Holdings Corp1.83%
Meta Platforms Inc Common1.79%
Advanced Micro Devices1.67%
Johnson & Johnson Common1.67%
Mastercard Inc Common1.57%
Alphabet Inc-Cl A -1.54%
Micron Technology Inc1.38%
Costco Wholesale Corp1.36%
Merck & Co Inc Common1.12%
The Procter & Gamble1.11%
Palantir Technologies Inc1.10%
Cisco Systems Inc Common1.09%
Home Depot Inc/The Common1.02%
Texas Instruments Inc0.87%
Palo Alto Networks Inc0.84%
Linde PLC Common Stock0.77%
Chevron Corp Common Stock0.72%
Applied Materials Inc0.70%
Lam Research Corp Common0.69%
BlackRock Inc Common0.67%
Analog Devices Inc Common0.66%
Ge Vernova Inc Common0.66%
Mcdonald's Corp Common0.65%
Union Pacific Corp Common0.64%
Kla Corp Common Stock USD0.62%
Accenture PLC Common0.61%
Altria Group Inc Common0.55%
Tjx Cos Inc/The Common0.54%
Applovin Corp Common0.49%
Chubb Ltd Common Stock0.49%
Marsh & Mclennan Cos Inc0.48%
Philip Morris0.47%
Lockheed Martin Corp0.46%
Bristol-Myers Squibb Co0.46%
Automatic Data Processing0.45%
Starbucks Corp Common0.44%
Waste Management Inc0.43%
Marriott International0.43%
Cadence Design Systems0.43%
S&P Global Inc Common0.42%
Colgate-Palmolive Company0.42%
Travelers Cos Inc/The0.42%
Progressive Corp/The0.42%
Booking Holdings Inc0.42%
Sandisk Corp Common Stock0.41%
Conocophillips Common0.41%
Skyworks Solutions Inc0.39%

Weight gaps

All 42 Holdings in both funds, largest gap first.

Holding weights in ABOT and JQUA, widest gap first
Holding	Gap	ABOT	JQUA
Apple IncAAPL	ABOT +3.28 points	5.45%	2.17%
NVIDIA CorpNVDA	ABOT +2.69 points	4.33%	1.64%
Gilead Sciences IncGILD	ABOT +2.52 points	3.27%	0.75%
Autodesk IncADSK	ABOT +2.49 points	2.88%	0.39%
VeriSign IncVRSN	ABOT +2.41 points	2.69%	0.28%
Airbnb IncABNB	ABOT +2.32 points	2.67%	0.35%
IDEXX Laboratories IncIDXX	ABOT +2.14 points	2.47%	0.33%
AbbVie IncABBV	ABOT +2.11 points	3.53%	1.42%
Broadcom IncAVGO	ABOT +1.94 points	3.60%	1.66%
Adobe IncADBE	ABOT +1.92 points	2.35%	0.43%
Incyte CorpINCY	ABOT +1.91 points	2.06%	0.15%
Hasbro IncHAS	ABOT +1.90 points	2.08%	0.18%
Rubrik IncRBRK	ABOT +1.90 points	2.12%	0.22%
NetApp IncNTAP	ABOT +1.89 points	2.16%	0.27%
Everpure IncP	ABOT +1.88 points	1.96%	0.08%
Motorola Solutions IncMSI	ABOT +1.83 points	2.19%	0.36%
Exelixis IncEXEL	ABOT +1.80 points	1.95%	0.15%
Atlassian CorpTEAM	ABOT +1.79 points	2.02%	0.23%
Zscaler IncZS	ABOT +1.77 points	1.97%	0.20%
Nutanix IncNTNX	ABOT +1.74 points	1.95%	0.21%
Fortinet IncFTNT	ABOT +1.62 points	1.96%	0.34%
Dexcom IncDXCM	ABOT +1.58 points	1.76%	0.18%
Crowdstrike Holdings IncCRWD	ABOT +1.57 points	2.34%	0.77%
Snowflake IncSNOW	ABOT +1.57 points	1.97%	0.40%
Manhattan Associates IncMANH	ABOT +1.55 points	1.83%	0.28%
Intuit IncINTU	ABOT +1.55 points	1.99%	0.44%
Docusign IncDOCU	ABOT +1.52 points	1.79%	0.27%
Expedia Group IncEXPE	ABOT +1.50 points	1.72%	0.22%
Spotify Technology SASPOT	ABOT +1.45 points	1.80%	0.35%
GoDaddy IncGDDY	ABOT +1.42 points	1.69%	0.27%
QUALCOMM IncQCOM	ABOT +1.41 points	2.06%	0.65%
Maplebear IncCART	ABOT +1.37 points	1.62%	0.25%
Bentley Systems IncBSY	ABOT +1.34 points	1.63%	0.29%
New York Times Co/TheNYT	ABOT +1.17 points	1.33%	0.16%
Toro Co/TheTTC	ABOT +1.17 points	1.31%	0.14%
ServiceNow IncNOW	ABOT +1.09 points	1.50%	0.41%
HubSpot IncHUBS	ABOT +1.05 points	1.24%	0.19%
Reddit IncRDDT	ABOT +1.03 points	1.19%	0.16%
Vertiv Holdings CoVRT	ABOT +0.95 points	1.07%	0.12%
Salesforce IncCRM	ABOT +0.85 points	1.45%	0.60%
Match Group IncMTCH	ABOT +0.84 points	1.05%	0.21%
Etsy IncETSY	ABOT +0.68 points	0.94%	0.26%

All ABOT holdings⁠All 308 JQUA holdings⁠

How we measure overlap

Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.

ABOT vs JQUA Cost

Overpaying ABOT vs JQUA

$5,378

On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.

ABOT 0.39%
$7,898
JQUA 0.12%
$2,520

Amount$10,000

Years30 years

Cost over time

ABOT 0.39%
JQUA 0.12%
Overpaying

Year by year

Year	ABOT	JQUA	Overpaying
10	$705	$220	$485
20	$2,725	$859	$1,866
30	$7,898	$2,520	$5,378

Expense ratio

0.39%ABOT
0.12%JQUA, cheaper

JQUA0.12%ABOT0.39%

0.12%0.60%

Middle half of US Quality Index funds
Median 0.39%

JQUA cheapest of 26 funds

ABOT 14th cheapest of 26 funds

ABOT vs JQUA Dividends

Last 12 months to Nov 9, 2026

Yield (12M): ABOT 0.27%; JQUA 1.06%, better
Payout (12M): ABOT $0.11; JQUA $0.79
Last payment: ABOT $0.02; JQUA $0.18
Ex-dividend: ABOT Sep 29, 2026; JQUA Sep 22, 2026
Paid on: ABOT Sep 30, 2026; JQUA Sep 24, 2026
Frequency: ABOT Quarterly; JQUA Quarterly

Distribution history

Per share, 2017 to 2026, same scale for both

ABOTQuarterly · 12 paymentsAll ABOT payments⁠

JQUAQuarterly · 37 paymentsAll JQUA payments⁠

ABOT vs JQUA Risk

Fall from peak · 5 years

ABOT
JQUA

Risk facts

VolatilityStd dev, 3 years: ABOT 17.5%JQUA 11.6%, better
Return per unit of riskSharpe ratio, 3 years: ABOT 1.07JQUA 1.47, better
Worst fallMax drawdown, 5 years: ABOT −29.7%JQUA −22.5%, better
Market sensitivityBeta, 5 years: ABOT 0.86JQUA 0.91; Market = 1

ABOT and JQUA in the news

All news⁠

New ETFs
Jensen's first passive ETF charges 0.25% for a 10-year profit test
Oct 5, 2026JQUA
Category Review
Cash-flow quality returned 42% while QUAL returned 17%
Updated Sep 22, 2026JQUA

Popular comparisons

ABOTDvsQUALA
Abacus FCF Innovation Leaders ETF · iShares MSCI USA Quality Factor ETF
Expense ratio
0.39% · 0.15%
Category
JQUAAvsQUALA
JPMorgan U.S. Quality Factor ETF · iShares MSCI USA Quality Factor ETF
Expense ratio
0.12% · 0.15%
Category
ABOTDvsFQALA
Abacus FCF Innovation Leaders ETF · Fidelity Quality Factor ETF
Expense ratio
0.39% · 0.15%
Category
JQUAAvsFQALA
JPMorgan U.S. Quality Factor ETF · Fidelity Quality Factor ETF
Expense ratio
0.12% · 0.15%
Category
ABOTDvsSPHQA
Abacus FCF Innovation Leaders ETF · Invesco S&P 500 Quality ETF
Expense ratio
0.39% · 0.15%
Category
JQUAAvsSPHQA
JPMorgan U.S. Quality Factor ETF · Invesco S&P 500 Quality ETF
Expense ratio
0.12% · 0.15%
Category

ABOT vs JQUA

In short

Stated mandate

Why people hold it

Worth knowing

How ABOT and JQUA differ

Level by level

Sector

Country, concentration and asset class

Country by domicile

Concentration

Asset class

Holdings

Only in ABOT

Only in JQUA

Weight gaps

Cost over time

Year by year

Distribution history

Fall from peak · 5 years

Risk facts

Jensen's first passive ETF charges 0.25% for a 10-year profit test

Cash-flow quality returned 42% while QUAL returned 17%

How ABOT and JQUA differ

Level by level

Sector

Country, concentration and asset class

Country by domicile

Concentration

Asset class

Holdings

Only in ABOT

Only in JQUA

Weight gaps