ABOT vs FQAL: Grades, Fees and Holdings Compared

Abacus FCF Innovation Leaders ETF

ABOTDCboe

Fidelity Quality Factor ETF

FQALANYSE Arca

Overlap

20.0%by weight

Expense ratio

FQAL −0.24pt a year

ABOT0.39%FQAL0.15%

Avg volume · 30D

FQAL 165.9×the volume

ABOT423FQAL70.2K

5Y return · a year

FQAL +1.7pt

ABOT+8.6%FQAL+10.3%

ABOT vs FQAL Performance

Nov 9, 2021 – Nov 9, 2026

+50.7%ABOT+63.5%FQAL

Expense ratio: ABOT 0.39%; FQAL 0.15%, better
Fund size: ABOT $4M; FQAL $1.55B
1Y total return: ABOT +9.3%; FQAL +13.6%, better
Yield (12M): ABOT 0.27%; FQAL 1.16%, better
Holdings: ABOT 52; FQAL 136
Avg volume (30D): ABOT 423 sh; FQAL 70.2K sh, better
NAV per share: ABOT $42.47; FQAL $83.16
52W range

ETF.net Grade

Pillar letters and Scores for ABOT, FQAL, with each pillar’s weight
Pillar	ABOT	FQAL
Cost30% weight	C44	A84Higher
Mission25% weight	F18	A89Higher
Risk15% weight	F16	A71Higher
Tradability15% weight	F18	B56Higher
Holdings10% weight	B57	B57
Durability5% weight	F24	A76Higher

Rank among US Quality Index funds

How we build Categories ›

Same Category. ABOT and FQAL are both graded against the same 26 US Quality Index funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

US Quality Index⁠

Category · 26 funds

See all 26 ›

FQAL ranks 3rd and ABOT 24th of 26 funds in the US Quality Index Category.

Rank 1AJQUAJPMorgan U.S. Quality Factor ETFScore 81
Rank 2AQUALiShares MSCI USA Quality Factor ETFScore 77
Rank 3AFQALFidelity Quality Factor ETFScore 76
Rank 4ASPHQInvesco S&P 500 Quality ETFScore 74
Rank 23DEMOTFirst Trust S&P 500 Economic Moat ETFScore 31
Rank 24DABOTAbacus FCF Innovation Leaders ETFScore 29
Rank 25FOWNCorgi Inside Ownership 100 ETFScore 23

Our read on each fund

ETF.net Research

ABOTDAbacus FCF Innovation Leaders ETF

FQALAFidelity Quality Factor ETF

In short

ABOT No data

FQAL Fidelity's own quality screen, boxed into an ETF: roughly 130 U.S. companies picked for profitability, steady cash flow and clean balance sheets, at 0.15% a year, well under the typical fee in the quality-factor group.

Stated mandate

ABOT No data

FQAL The fund prioritizes U.S. companies exhibiting higher profitability, stable cash flows, and strong balance sheets.

Why people hold it

ABOT No data

FQAL Costs 0.15% a year, roughly half the typical fee among quality-factor ETFs. That puts it in the cheapest tier of the group, alongside JQUA, VFQY and QUAL.
The rulebook is Fidelity's own: the Fidelity U.S. Quality Factor Index, tracked tightly. One of the closer index implementations in its peer group.
Live since 2016 and now a multi-billion-dollar fund, so this is a settled product rather than a launch still finding its footing.
The screen is explicit about what it wants: higher profitability, stable cash flows, strong balance sheets. No vague 'quality' hand-waving.

Worth knowing

ABOT No data

FQAL Roughly 130 stocks, not the whole market. A narrower bench means individual names and sector tilts carry more weight than in a total-market fund.
Trading volume is light next to the category's biggest quality funds, which can show up as wider bid-ask spreads.
Distributions come quarterly, but the screen hunts profitability and balance-sheet strength, not yield.

Full ABOT profile⁠

Full FQAL profile⁠

ABOT vs FQAL Holdings

How ABOT and FQAL differ

Overlap by weight

20.0%

Shared holdings make up 40.2% of ABOT and 25.3% of FQAL.

Level by level

Holdings15 in both20.0%
Sector11 Sectors63.9%
Countryby domicile95.8%
Asset classStocks100%

Sector

Sector weights in ABOT and FQAL, widest gap first
Sector	Gap	ABOT	FQAL
Technology	ABOT +29.4 points	64.8%	35.4%
Financials	FQAL +12.8 points	0.0%	12.8%
Health Care	ABOT +6.8 points	17.5%	10.7%
Industrials	FQAL +5.3 points	3.9%	9.2%
Consumer Staples	FQAL +4.7 points	0.0%	4.7%
Energy	FQAL +4.1 points	0.0%	4.1%
Communication	FQAL +2.6 points	5.3%	7.9%
Real Estate	FQAL +2.1 points	0.0%	2.1%
Utilities	FQAL +2.1 points	0.0%	2.1%
Materials	FQAL +2.1 points	0.0%	2.1%
Consumer Discretionary	FQAL +0.3 points	8.6%	8.9%

Country, concentration and asset class

Country by domicile

Country weights in ABOT and FQAL, widest gap first
Country	Gap	ABOT	FQAL
United States	FQAL +3.8 points	95.8%	99.6%
Australia	ABOT +2.4 points	2.4%	0.0%
Sweden	ABOT +1.8 points	1.8%	0.0%
Switzerland	FQAL +0.4 points	0.0%	0.4%

Concentration

Weight in the 10 largest Holdings

ABOT33.6%
FQAL37.8%

Securities held

ABOT51
FQAL134

Asset class

ABOT: Stocks
FQAL: Stocks

Holdings

Only in ABOT36
In both15
Only in FQAL119

Only in ABOT

36 securities, 59.8% of ABOT by weight

Autodesk Inc2.88%
ROBLOX Corp2.70%
Crowdstrike Holdings Inc2.34%
Motorola Solutions Inc2.19%
NetApp Inc2.16%
Rubrik Inc2.12%
Incyte Corp2.06%
Atlassian Corp2.02%
Intuit Inc1.99%
Snowflake Inc1.97%
Zscaler Inc1.97%
Everpure Inc1.96%
Nutanix Inc1.95%
Exelixis Inc1.95%
Manhattan Associates Inc1.83%
Spotify Technology SA1.80%
Docusign Inc1.79%
Dexcom Inc1.76%
Expedia Group Inc1.72%
GoDaddy Inc1.69%
Bentley Systems Inc1.63%
Maplebear Inc1.62%
Rockwell Automation Inc1.52%
ServiceNow Inc1.50%
Salesforce Inc1.45%
Halozyme Therapeutics Inc1.35%
New York Times Co/The1.33%
Toro Co/The1.31%
HubSpot Inc1.24%
DraftKings Inc1.12%
Match Group Inc1.05%
Alnylam Pharmaceuticals Inc0.98%
Etsy Inc0.94%
Gitlab Inc0.89%
Qualys Inc0.83%
Us Bank Mmda - Usbgfs 9 09/01/20370.14%

Only in FQAL

119 securities, 74.5% of FQAL by weight

Microsoft Corp6.42%
Alphabet Inc Class A4.46%
Meta Platforms Inc Class A2.09%
Eli Lilly & Co1.96%
JPMorgan Chase & Co1.87%
Visa Inc Class A1.71%
Micron Technology Inc1.67%
Mastercard Inc Class A1.45%
Johnson & Johnson1.36%
Palantir Technologies Inc1.25%
Exxonmobil Holdings Corp1.18%
Cisco Systems Inc1.08%
Merck & Co Inc New0.94%
Procter & Gamble Co0.88%
Home Depot Inc0.88%
UnitedHealth Group Inc0.88%
Cme Group Inc Class A0.87%
Coca Cola Co0.85%
Progressive Corp Ohio0.84%
Applied Materials Inc0.82%
Lam Research Corp0.82%
Thermo Fisher Scientific Inc0.82%
Ge Aerospace0.80%
Amgen Inc0.78%
Chevron Corp0.78%
Moodys Corp0.76%
Msci Inc0.76%
Philip Morris Intl Inc0.75%
Travelers Companies Inc0.75%
Mcdonalds Corp0.68%
Kinsale Capital Group Inc0.64%
Mckesson Corp0.63%
East West Bancorp Inc0.62%
Ameriprise Financial Inc0.61%
Caterpillar Inc0.61%
Union Pacific Corp0.60%
Cullen Frost Bankers Inc0.59%
Marriott International Inc A0.59%
Lowes Cos Inc0.59%
Ge Vernova Inc0.58%
Zions Bancorp0.58%
Hilton Worldwide Holdings Inc0.58%
Automatic Data Processing Inc0.57%
Axos Financial Inc0.56%
Popular Inc0.56%
Tjx Companies Inc New0.54%
Bristol-Myers Squibb Co0.54%
Seagate Techn Holdings PLC0.53%
Netflix Inc0.52%
Altria Group Inc0.51%

Weight gaps

All 15 Holdings in both funds, largest gap first.

Holding weights in ABOT and FQAL, widest gap first
Holding	Gap	ABOT	FQAL
NVIDIA CorpNVDA	FQAL +2.77 points	4.33%	7.10%
Apple IncAAPL	FQAL +2.55 points	5.45%	8.00%
Gilead Sciences IncGILD	ABOT +2.50 points	3.27%	0.77%
AbbVie IncABBV	ABOT +2.35 points	3.53%	1.18%
Airbnb IncABNB	ABOT +2.06 points	2.67%	0.61%
IDEXX Laboratories IncIDXX	ABOT +1.97 points	2.47%	0.50%
VeriSign IncVRSN	ABOT +1.92 points	2.69%	0.77%
Adobe IncADBE	ABOT +1.57 points	2.35%	0.78%
Hasbro IncHAS	ABOT +1.55 points	2.08%	0.53%
Fortinet IncFTNT	ABOT +1.33 points	1.96%	0.63%
Broadcom IncAVGO	ABOT +1.11 points	3.60%	2.49%
QUALCOMM IncQCOM	ABOT +1.09 points	2.06%	0.97%
Reddit IncRDDT	ABOT +1.07 points	1.19%	0.12%
Fair Isaac CorpFICO	ABOT +0.99 points	1.49%	0.50%
Vertiv Holdings CoVRT	ABOT +0.73 points	1.07%	0.34%

All ABOT holdings⁠All 130 FQAL holdings⁠

How we measure overlap

Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.

ABOT vs FQAL Cost

Overpaying ABOT vs FQAL

$4,761

On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.

ABOT 0.39%
$7,898
FQAL 0.15%
$3,137

Amount$10,000

Years30 years

Cost over time

ABOT 0.39%
FQAL 0.15%
Overpaying

Year by year

Year	ABOT	FQAL	Overpaying
10	$705	$274	$431
20	$2,725	$1,071	$1,654
30	$7,898	$3,137	$4,761

Expense ratio

0.39%ABOT
0.15%FQAL, cheaper

FQAL0.15%ABOT0.39%

0.12%0.60%

Middle half of US Quality Index funds
Median 0.39%

FQAL 3rd cheapest of 26 funds

ABOT 14th cheapest of 26 funds

ABOT vs FQAL Dividends

Last 12 months to Nov 9, 2026

Yield (12M): ABOT 0.27%; FQAL 1.16%, better
Payout (12M): ABOT $0.11; FQAL $0.97
Last payment: ABOT $0.02; FQAL $0.24
Ex-dividend: ABOT Sep 29, 2026; FQAL Sep 18, 2026
Paid on: ABOT Sep 30, 2026; FQAL Sep 22, 2026
Frequency: ABOT Quarterly; FQAL Quarterly

Distribution history

Per share, 2017 to 2026, same scale for both

ABOTQuarterly · 12 paymentsAll ABOT payments⁠

FQALQuarterly · 39 paymentsAll FQAL payments⁠

ABOT vs FQAL Risk

Fall from peak · 5 years

ABOT
FQAL

Risk facts

VolatilityStd dev, 3 years: ABOT 17.5%FQAL 11.0%, better
Return per unit of riskSharpe ratio, 3 years: ABOT 1.07FQAL 1.45, better
Worst fallMax drawdown, 5 years: ABOT −29.7%FQAL −25.5%, better
Market sensitivityBeta, 5 years: ABOT 0.86FQAL 0.94; Market = 1

ABOT and FQAL in the news

All news⁠

Category Review
Cash-flow quality returned 42% while QUAL returned 17%
Updated Sep 22, 2026FQAL

Popular comparisons

ABOTDvsJQUAA
Abacus FCF Innovation Leaders ETF · JPMorgan U.S. Quality Factor ETF
Expense ratio
0.39% · 0.12%
Category
FQALAvsJQUAA
Fidelity Quality Factor ETF · JPMorgan U.S. Quality Factor ETF
Expense ratio
0.15% · 0.12%
Category
ABOTDvsQUALA
Abacus FCF Innovation Leaders ETF · iShares MSCI USA Quality Factor ETF
Expense ratio
0.39% · 0.15%
Category
FQALAvsQUALA
Fidelity Quality Factor ETF · iShares MSCI USA Quality Factor ETF
Expense ratio
0.15% · 0.15%
Category
ABOTDvsSPHQA
Abacus FCF Innovation Leaders ETF · Invesco S&P 500 Quality ETF
Expense ratio
0.39% · 0.15%
Category
FQALAvsSPHQA
Fidelity Quality Factor ETF · Invesco S&P 500 Quality ETF
Expense ratio
0.15% · 0.15%
Category

ABOT vs FQAL

In short

Stated mandate

Why people hold it

Worth knowing

How ABOT and FQAL differ

Level by level

Sector

Country, concentration and asset class

Country by domicile

Concentration

Asset class

Holdings

Only in ABOT

Only in FQAL

Weight gaps

Cost over time

Year by year

Distribution history

Fall from peak · 5 years

Risk facts

Cash-flow quality returned 42% while QUAL returned 17%

How ABOT and FQAL differ

Level by level

Sector

Country, concentration and asset class

Country by domicile

Concentration

Asset class

Holdings

Only in ABOT

Only in FQAL

Weight gaps