ACEP vs BGDV: Grades, Fees and Holdings Compared

ARS Core Equity Portfolio ETF

ACEPCNasdaq

Bahl & Gaynor Dividend ETF

BGDVBNYSE Arca

Overlap

15.0%by weight

Expense ratio

BGDV −0.01pt a year

ACEP0.46%BGDV0.45%

Avg volume · 30D

BGDV 8.2×the volume

ACEP3.92KBGDV32.2K

ACEP vs BGDV Performance

Dec 31, 2025 – Oct 30, 2026

+23.3%ACEP+15.0%BGDV

Expense ratio: ACEP 0.46%; BGDV 0.45%, better
Fund size: ACEP $102M; BGDV $878M
1Y total return: ACEP No data; BGDV +18.9%
Yield (12M): ACEP No data; BGDV 0.94%
Holdings: ACEP 37; BGDV 47
Avg volume (30D): ACEP 3.92K sh; BGDV 32.2K sh, better
NAV per share: ACEP $20.10; BGDV $31.51
52W range

ETF.net Grade

Pillar letters and Scores for ACEP, BGDV, with each pillar’s weight
Pillar	ACEP	BGDV
Cost30% weight	A73	A73
Mission25% weight	B60	Not scored
Risk15% weight	C50Higher	C44
Tradability15% weight	D25	A81Higher
Holdings10% weight	C41	B64Higher
Durability5% weight	C43	A70Higher

Rank among US Active Dividend Income funds

How we build Categories ›

Same Category. ACEP and BGDV are both graded against the same 40 US Active Dividend Income funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

US Active Dividend Income⁠

Category · 40 funds

See all 40 ›

BGDV ranks 4th and ACEP 18th of 40 funds in the US Active Dividend Income Category.

Rank 1ACGDVCapital Group Dividend Value ETFScore 76
Rank 2AHIDVAB US High Dividend ETFScore 73
Rank 3ABGIGBahl & Gaynor Income Growth ETFScore 70
Rank 4BBGDVBahl & Gaynor Dividend ETFScore 67
Rank 4BFDIVMarketDesk Focused U.S. Dividend ETFScore 67
Rank 17CRFDAALPS Dynamic US Dividend Advantage ETFScore 53
Rank 18CACEPARS Core Equity Portfolio ETFScore 52
Rank 19CDIVPCullen Enhanced Equity Income ETFScore 47

Our read on each fund

ETF.net Research

ACEPCARS Core Equity Portfolio ETF

BGDVBBahl & Gaynor Dividend ETF

In short

ACEP A veteran New York boutique's long-running core equity strategy, wrapped in an ETF in late 2025: a human hunt for strong balance sheets, reasonable earnings growth and above-average dividend yields instead of an index screen.

BGDV No data

Stated mandate

ACEP The Fund seeks long-term capital appreciation while also generating current income.

BGDV No data

Why people hold it

ACEP Real stock picking, not a screen: the sub-adviser targets US companies it deems high quality, judged on strong balance sheets, reasonable earnings growth and above-average dividend yields.etfarchitect.com sec.gov
Not a blank slate. The prospectus prints the sub-adviser's separate-account composite for this same core equity strategy, which dates back to October 2011.etfarchitect.com
0.46% all in, gross and net identical with no waiver propping it up, and near the typical fee for active dividend-income ETFs. Cheaper peers exist: CGDV at 0.33%, VUS at 0.25%; BGIG sits at 0.45%.
Among the roughly 40 active dividend-and-income equity ETFs we cover, this one already sits in the upper half of the pack.

BGDV No data

Worth knowing

ACEP It listed in November 2025, so the live ETF record is short and risk readings rest on limited history.
Small and thinly traded, so spreads can run wider than on a household-name fund and bigger orders need more care at the screen.
Current income is in the objective, but cash reaches shareholders on an annual or semiannual schedule, not monthly.

BGDV No data

Full ACEP profile⁠

Full BGDV profile⁠

ACEP vs BGDV Holdings

How ACEP and BGDV differ

Overlap by weight

15.0%

Shared holdings make up 25.2% of ACEP and 15.0% of BGDV.

Level by level

Holdings7 in both15.0%
Sector11 Sectors77.1%
Countryby domicile89.6%
Asset classEquity100%

Sector

Sector weights in ACEP and BGDV, widest gap first
Sector	More in ACEPMore in BGDV	ACEP	BGDV
Energy	ACEP +9.9 points	16.6%	6.7%
Materials	ACEP +9.1 points	11.3%	2.2%
Health Care	BGDV +5.0 points	7.9%	12.9%
Utilities	BGDV +4.1 points	0.0%	4.1%
Industrials	BGDV +4.1 points	10.3%	14.3%
Technology	ACEP +3.8 points	31.7%	27.9%
Financials	BGDV +3.2 points	15.2%	18.4%
Communication	BGDV +2.9 points	2.3%	5.2%
Consumer Discretionary	BGDV +2.3 points	2.6%	4.9%
Real Estate	BGDV +1.1 points	0.0%	1.1%
Consumer Staples	BGDV +0.1 points	2.2%	2.3%

Country, concentration and asset class

Country by domicile

Country weights in ACEP and BGDV, widest gap first
Country	More in ACEPMore in BGDV	ACEP	BGDV
Canada	ACEP +8.3 points	8.3%	0.0%
United States	BGDV +5.6 points	89.6%	95.2%
Taiwan	BGDV +4.8 points	0.0%	4.8%
Denmark	ACEP +2.2 points	2.2%	0.0%

Concentration

Weight in the 10 largest Holdings

ACEP38.4%
BGDV35.1%

Securities held

ACEP36
BGDV47

Asset class

ACEP: Equity
BGDV: Equity

Holdings

Only in ACEP29
In both7
Only in BGDV40

Only in ACEP

29 securities, 74.7% of ACEP by weight

United States Treasury Bill 01/28/20275.26%
Barrick Mining Corp3.42%
International Business Machines Corp3.40%
Seagate Technology Holdings PLC3.21%
Lam Research Corp3.18%
Southern Copper Corp3.17%
Arthur J Gallagher & Co3.05%
Blackstone Inc3.03%
RTX Corp2.93%
EOG Resources Inc2.89%
Johnson & Johnson2.89%
Golar LNG Ltd2.76%
Bristol-Myers Squibb Co2.73%
Blackrock Inc2.58%
Hewlett Packard Enterprise Co2.54%
McDonald's Corp2.52%
Apple Inc2.45%
Brookfield Asset Management Ltd2.36%
Crh PLC2.32%
Comcast Corp2.30%
Automatic Data Processing Inc2.29%
QUALCOMM Inc2.24%
Phillips 662.12%
Novo Nordisk A/S2.04%
Bunge Global SA1.95%
Northrop Grumman Corp1.79%
Pan American Silver Corp1.63%
Honeywell International Inc1.44%
First American Government Obligations Fund 12/01/20310.20%

Only in BGDV

40 securities, 85.0% of BGDV by weight

Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co Ltd4.77%
Eli Lilly & Co4.18%
Victory Capital Holdings Inc3.85%
AbbVie Inc3.49%
Motorola Solutions Inc3.40%
Encompass Health Corp3.18%
NVIDIA Corp3.17%
UnitedHealth Group Inc3.00%
Amphenol Corp2.81%
Cintas Corp2.79%
Microsoft Corp2.68%
Williams Cos Inc/The2.65%
Reinsurance Group of America Inc2.51%
Waste Management Inc2.36%
Reliance Inc2.28%
Meta Platforms Inc2.27%
Western Digital Corp2.16%
Hartford Insurance Group Inc/The2.13%
Snap-on Inc2.08%
Alphabet Inc1.93%
TJX Cos Inc/The1.92%
NextEra Energy Inc1.87%
Hubbell Inc1.86%
Carrier Global Corp1.84%
Cboe Global Markets Inc1.83%
Ferrari NV1.81%
Travelers Cos Inc/The1.80%
Mondelez International Inc1.63%
CME Group Inc1.44%
Home Depot Inc/The1.28%
Apollo Global Management Inc1.26%
Sempra1.22%
CMS Energy Corp1.20%
Ge Aerospace1.19%
KKR & Co Inc1.11%
Welltower Inc1.05%
Kla Corp0.82%
Casey's General Stores Inc0.80%
Walmart Inc0.75%
Evercore Inc0.56%

Weight gaps

All 7 Holdings in both funds, largest gap first.

Holding weights in ACEP and BGDV, widest gap first
Holding	More in ACEPMore in BGDV	ACEP	BGDV
Accenture PLCACN	ACEP +2.97 points	3.95%	0.98%
Chevron CorpCVX	ACEP +2.60 points	4.35%	1.75%
Parker-Hannifin CorpPH	ACEP +1.59 points	3.61%	2.02%
JPMorgan Chase & Co.JPM	ACEP +1.29 points	3.62%	2.33%
Targa Resources CorpTRGP	ACEP +1.08 points	3.94%	2.86%
Broadcom IncAVGO	ACEP +0.47 points	3.64%	3.17%
Analog Devices IncADI	ACEP +0.16 points	2.09%	1.93%

All ACEP holdings⁠All 47 BGDV holdings⁠

How we measure overlap

Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.

ACEP vs BGDV Cost

Overpaying ACEP vs BGDV

$189

On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.

ACEP 0.46%
$9,230
BGDV 0.45%
$9,041

Amount$10,000

Years30 years

Cost over time

ACEP 0.46%
BGDV 0.45%
Overpaying

Year by year

Year	ACEP	BGDV	Overpaying
10	$830	$812	$18
20	$3,195	$3,128	$67
30	$9,230	$9,041	$189

Expense ratio

0.46%ACEP
0.45%BGDV, cheaper

BGDV0.45%ACEP0.46%

0.25%0.99%

Middle half of US Active Dividend Income funds
Median 0.50%

BGDV 9th cheapest of 40 funds

ACEP 14th cheapest of 40 funds

ACEP vs BGDV Dividends

Last 12 months to Oct 30, 2026

Yield (12M): ACEP No data; BGDV 0.94%
Payout (12M): ACEP No data; BGDV $0.29
Last payment: ACEP $0.02; BGDV $0.02
Ex-dividend: ACEP Dec 30, 2025; BGDV Oct 29, 2026
Paid on: ACEP Dec 31, 2025; BGDV Pays Nov 2, 2026
Frequency: ACEP Irregular; BGDV Monthly

Distribution history

Per share, 2024 to 2026, same scale for both

ACEPIrregular · 1 paymentAll ACEP payments⁠

BGDVMonthly · 23 paymentsAll BGDV payments⁠

ACEP vs BGDV Risk

Fall from peak · 5 years

This chart needs five years of history for both funds.

Risk facts

VolatilityStd dev, 3 years: ACEP No dataBGDV 11.4%since Jan 2025
Return per unit of riskSharpe ratio, 3 years: ACEP No dataBGDV 1.00since Jan 2025
Worst fallMax drawdown, 5 years: ACEP No dataBGDV −14.8%since Dec 2024
Market sensitivityBeta, 5 years: ACEP 0.85BGDV 0.69; Market = 1

Popular comparisons

ACEPCvsCGDVA
ARS Core Equity Portfolio ETF · Capital Group Dividend Value ETF
Expense ratio
0.46% · 0.33%
Category
BGDVBvsCGDVA
Bahl & Gaynor Dividend ETF · Capital Group Dividend Value ETF
Expense ratio
0.45% · 0.33%
Category
ACEPCvsHIDVA
ARS Core Equity Portfolio ETF · AB US High Dividend ETF
Expense ratio
0.46% · 0.35%
Category
BGDVBvsHIDVA
Bahl & Gaynor Dividend ETF · AB US High Dividend ETF
Expense ratio
0.45% · 0.35%
Category
ACEPCvsBGIGA
ARS Core Equity Portfolio ETF · Bahl & Gaynor Income Growth ETF
Expense ratio
0.46% · 0.45%
Category
BGDVBvsBGIGA
Bahl & Gaynor Dividend ETF · Bahl & Gaynor Income Growth ETF
Expense ratio
0.45% · 0.45%
Category