ACLO ranks 4th and FUSI 10th of 34 funds in the Collateralized Loan Obligations (CLO) Category.
ACLO vs FUSI
FUSI −0.01pt a year
0.20%0.19%
ACLO 1.9×the volume
36.8K19.3K
ACLO vs FUSI Performance
+5.0%+4.6%
- ACLO 0.20%
- FUSI 0.19%, better
- ACLO $596M
- FUSI $71M
- ACLO +5.0%, better
- FUSI +4.6%
- ACLO 4.89%, better
- FUSI 4.86%
- ACLO 368
- FUSI 173
- ACLO 36.8K sh, better
- FUSI 19.3K sh
- ACLO $50.53
- FUSI $50.50
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | ACLO | FUSI |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | A80 | A80 |
| Mission | ||
| Risk | B64 | B66Higher |
| Tradability | A70Higher | D38 |
| Holdings | A84Higher | B63 |
| Durability | B64Higher | C49 |
Rank among Collateralized Loan Obligations (CLO) funds
Same Category. ACLO and FUSI are both graded against the same 34 Collateralized Loan Obligations (CLO) funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
ACLOA
FUSIB
In short
ACLO A 2024 arrival in the crowded AAA CLO aisle. TCW runs it actively, holding roughly 300 of the highest-rated slices of leveraged-loan pools, paying income monthly, at a fee matching the category's cheapest tier.
FUSI Most funds in this corner of the bond market own one thing: AAA CLO tranches. FUSI casts wider, running an actively managed, ultrashort book across CLOs, commercial and residential mortgages and corporate credit, at 0.19% a year.
Stated mandate
ACLO The fund seeks capital preservation and current income through principal investment in U.S. dollar-denominated AAA-rated collateralized loan obligations.
FUSI The fund seeks current income and, secondarily, long-term capital appreciation. It invests primarily in investment-grade floating-rate securities across CLOs, commercial and residential mortgages, corporate credit, and similar structured investments, with tactical sector allocation.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
ACLO vs FUSI Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
ACLO vs FUSI Cost
Overpaying ACLO vs FUSI
$203
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
ACLO 0.20%
$4,155
FUSI 0.19%
$3,952
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | ACLO | FUSI | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $365 | $347 | $18 |
| 20 | $1,421 | $1,351 | $70 |
| 30 | $4,155 | $3,952 | $203 |
- 0.20%ACLO
- 0.19%FUSI, cheaper
- Middle half of Collateralized Loan Obligations (CLO) funds
- Median 0.28%
FUSI 2nd cheapest of 34 funds
ACLO 8th cheapest of 34 funds
ACLO vs FUSI Dividends
- ACLO 4.89%, better
- FUSI 4.86%
- ACLO $2.47
- FUSI $2.46
- ACLO $0.19
- FUSI $0.14
- ACLO Oct 1, 2026
- FUSI Oct 6, 2026
- ACLO Oct 5, 2026
- FUSI Oct 8, 2026
- ACLO Monthly
- FUSI Monthly
Distribution history
ACLO vs FUSI Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- ACLO 0.6%FUSI 0.7%
- Return per unit of risk
- ACLO 1.74FUSI 1.35
- Worst fall
- ACLO −1.0%FUSI −0.7%
- Market sensitivity
- ACLO 0.04FUSI 0.04Same figure. Both funds show the same value, so neither comes out ahead.
Popular comparisons
- 0.20% · 0.20%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.19% · 0.20%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.20% · 0.20%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.19% · 0.20%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.20% · 0.19%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.19% · 0.19%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.