ACLO ranks 4th and JA 19th of 34 funds in the Collateralized Loan Obligations (CLO) Category.
ACLO vs JA
ACLO −0.09pt a year
0.20%0.29%
ACLO 1.8×the volume
36.8K20.7K
ACLO vs JA Performance
+1.1%+1.2%
- ACLO 0.20%, better
- JA 0.29%
- ACLO $596M
- JA $183M
- ACLO +5.0%
- JA
- ACLO 4.89%
- JA
- ACLO 368
- JA 69
- ACLO 36.8K sh, better
- JA 20.7K sh
- ACLO $50.53
- JA $50.23
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | ACLO | JA |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | A80Higher | C45 |
| Mission | ||
| Risk | B64 | B64 |
| Tradability | A70Higher | C48 |
| Holdings | A84Higher | D36 |
| Durability | B64Higher | C50 |
Rank among Collateralized Loan Obligations (CLO) funds
Same Category. ACLO and JA are both graded against the same 34 Collateralized Loan Obligations (CLO) funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
ACLOA
JAC
In short
ACLO A 2024 arrival in the crowded AAA CLO aisle. TCW runs it actively, holding roughly 300 of the highest-rated slices of leveraged-loan pools, paying income monthly, at a fee matching the category's cheapest tier.
JA Most CLO ETFs pile into the AAA tranche. JA steps one rung down to AA and A rated, floating-rate CLOs, run by the same Janus securitized desk behind JAAA and JBBB. Fee: 0.29% net of a waiver through February 28, 2028.
Stated mandate
ACLO The fund seeks capital preservation and current income through principal investment in U.S. dollar-denominated AAA-rated collateralized loan obligations.
JA The fund seeks capital preservation and current income through an actively managed portfolio focused on high-quality AA to A rated collateralized loan obligations.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
ACLO vs JA Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
ACLO vs JA Cost
Overpaying JA vs ACLO
$1,797
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
ACLO 0.20%
$4,155
JA 0.29%
$5,952
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | ACLO | JA | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $365 | $527 | $162 |
| 20 | $1,421 | $2,044 | $623 |
| 30 | $4,155 | $5,952 | $1,797 |
- 0.20%ACLO, cheaper
- 0.29%JA
- Middle half of Collateralized Loan Obligations (CLO) funds
- Median 0.28%
ACLO 8th cheapest of 34 funds
JA 18th cheapest of 34 funds
ACLO vs JA Dividends
- ACLO 4.89%
- JA
- ACLO $2.47
- JA
- ACLO $0.19
- JA $0.20
- ACLO Oct 1, 2026
- JA Oct 30, 2026
- ACLO Oct 5, 2026
- JA Pays Nov 5, 2026
- ACLO Monthly
- JA Monthly
Distribution history
ACLO vs JA Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- ACLO 0.6%JA
- Return per unit of risk
- ACLO 1.74JA
- Worst fall
- ACLO −1.0%JA
- Market sensitivity
- ACLO 0.04JA 0.04Same figure. Both funds show the same value, so neither comes out ahead.
ACLO and JA in the news
Popular comparisons
- 0.20% · 0.20%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.29% · 0.20%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.20% · 0.20%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.29% · 0.20%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.20% · 0.19%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.29% · 0.19%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
