PAAA ranks 3rd and JA 19th of 34 funds in the Collateralized Loan Obligations (CLO) Category.
JA vs PAAA
PAAA −0.10pt a year
0.29%0.19%
PAAA 118.2×the volume
20.7K2.44M
JA vs PAAA Performance
+1.2%+1.2%
- JA 0.29%
- PAAA 0.19%, better
- JA $183M
- PAAA $15.1B
- JA
- PAAA +4.8%
- JA
- PAAA 5.06%
- JA 69
- PAAA 325
- JA 20.7K sh
- PAAA 2.44M sh, better
- JA $50.23
- PAAA $51.48
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | JA | PAAA |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | C45 | A80Higher |
| Mission | ||
| Risk | B64 | A79Higher |
| Tradability | C48 | A96Higher |
| Holdings | D36 | A75Higher |
| Durability | C50 | A87Higher |
Rank among Collateralized Loan Obligations (CLO) funds
Same Category. JA and PAAA are both graded against the same 34 Collateralized Loan Obligations (CLO) funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
JAC
PAAAA
In short
JA Most CLO ETFs pile into the AAA tranche. JA steps one rung down to AA and A rated, floating-rate CLOs, run by the same Janus securitized desk behind JAAA and JBBB. Fee: 0.29% net of a waiver through February 28, 2028.
PAAA PGIM's entry in the AAA CLO race: an actively run book of the senior-most slice of collateralized loan obligations, floating-rate, priced at 0.19%, paid out monthly. Same playbook as the category's biggest names, a hair cheaper.
Stated mandate
JA The fund seeks capital preservation and current income through an actively managed portfolio focused on high-quality AA to A rated collateralized loan obligations.
PAAA The Fund seeks to maximize total return through current income and capital appreciation. It invests primarily in U.S. dollar-denominated AAA-rated CLOs and is actively managed rather than designed to replicate a specific index.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
JA vs PAAA Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
JA vs PAAA Cost
Overpaying JA vs PAAA
$2,000
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
JA 0.29%
$5,952
PAAA 0.19%
$3,952
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | JA | PAAA | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $527 | $347 | $180 |
| 20 | $2,044 | $1,351 | $693 |
| 30 | $5,952 | $3,952 | $2,000 |
- 0.29%JA
- 0.19%PAAA, cheaper
- Middle half of Collateralized Loan Obligations (CLO) funds
- Median 0.28%
PAAA 2nd cheapest of 34 funds
JA 18th cheapest of 34 funds
JA vs PAAA Dividends
- JA
- PAAA 5.06%
- JA
- PAAA $2.60
- JA $0.20
- PAAA $0.21
- JA Oct 30, 2026
- PAAA Oct 30, 2026
- JA Pays Nov 5, 2026
- PAAA Pays Nov 3, 2026
- JA Monthly
- PAAA Monthly
Distribution history
JA vs PAAA Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- JA PAAA 0.7%
- Return per unit of risk
- JA PAAA 2.82
- Worst fall
- JA PAAA −1.0%
- Market sensitivity
- JA 0.04PAAA 0.03
JA and PAAA in the news
Popular comparisons
- 0.29% · 0.20%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.19% · 0.20%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.29% · 0.20%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.19% · 0.20%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.29% · 0.20%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.19% · 0.20%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
