ACVT ranks 4th and MCVT 6th of 7 funds in the Convertible Bond Category.
ACVT vs MCVT
ACVT −0.20pt a year
0.65%0.85%
MCVT 3.0×the volume
5.09K15.4K
ACVT vs MCVT Performance
−2.9%−7.3%
- ACVT 0.65%, better
- MCVT 0.85%
- ACVT $43M
- MCVT $31M
- ACVT +5.0%
- MCVT
- ACVT 1.56%
- MCVT
- ACVT 64
- MCVT 45
- ACVT 5.09K sh
- MCVT 15.4K sh, better
- ACVT $27.84
- MCVT $27.28
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | ACVT | MCVT |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | B56Higher | F20 |
| Mission | D28 | |
| Risk | A79Higher | A75 |
| Tradability | D32 | B60Higher |
| Holdings | B64Higher | B56 |
| Durability | C49Higher | F21 |
Rank among Convertible Bond funds
Same Category. ACVT and MCVT are both graded against the same 7 Convertible Bond funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
ACVTC
MCVTC
In short
MCVT Convertibles handled by bond people, not stock people: Wellesley, a convertibles-only shop since 1991, hunts converts with put provisions, short maturities and issuer principal guarantees. Active where most rivals just index.
Stated mandate
MCVT The fund seeks to maximize total return while limiting volatility and preserving principal. Its strategy uses convertible securities to combine income potential with capital appreciation.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
ACVT vs MCVT Holdings
How ACVT and MCVT differ
Two bond funds rarely hold the same issues.
Level by level
- Country97.4%
Sector
No Sector split for ACVT and MCVT.
Country, concentration and asset class
Country
| Country | More in ACVTMore in MCVT | Gap | ACVT | MCVT |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| United States | MCVT +2.6 points | 97.4% | 100.0% | |
| United Kingdom | ACVT +2.6 points | 2.6% | 0.0% |
Concentration
- ACVT28.1%
- MCVT29.4%
- ACVT63
- MCVT45
Asset class
- ACVT
- Bonds
- MCVT
- Bonds
Holdings
Two bond funds rarely hold the same issues, so this page lists no shared Holdings. ACVT holds 63 securities, MCVT 45.
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
ACVT vs MCVT Cost
Overpaying MCVT vs ACVT
$3,482
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
ACVT 0.65%
$12,717
MCVT 0.85%
$16,199
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | ACVT | MCVT | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $1,163 | $1,508 | $345 |
| 20 | $4,440 | $5,706 | $1,266 |
| 30 | $12,717 | $16,199 | $3,482 |
- 0.65%ACVT, cheaper
- 0.85%MCVT
- Middle half of Convertible Bond funds
- Median 0.69%
ACVT 3rd cheapest of 7 funds
MCVT 6th cheapest of 7 funds
ACVT vs MCVT Dividends
- ACVT 1.56%
- MCVT
- ACVT $0.43
- MCVT
- ACVT $0.03
- MCVT $0.02
- ACVT Oct 27, 2026
- MCVT Sep 15, 2026
- ACVT Oct 28, 2026
- MCVT Sep 21, 2026
- ACVT Monthly
- MCVT Quarterly
Distribution history
ACVT vs MCVT Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- ACVT 5.9%MCVT
- Return per unit of risk
- ACVT 0.78MCVT
- Worst fall
- ACVT −4.8%MCVT
- Market sensitivity
- ACVT 0.44MCVT 0.38
Popular comparisons
- 0.65% · 0.20%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.85% · 0.20%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.65% · 0.40%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.85% · 0.40%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.65% · 0.69%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.85% · 0.69%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.