ICVT ranks 1st and MCVT 6th of 7 funds in the Convertible Bond Category.
ICVT vs MCVT
ICVT −0.65pt a year
0.20%0.85%
ICVT 43.4×the volume
669K15.4K
ICVT vs MCVT Performance
−13.1%−7.3%
- ICVT 0.20%, better
- MCVT 0.85%
- ICVT $7.14B
- MCVT $31M
- ICVT −0.8%
- MCVT
- ICVT 1.63%
- MCVT
- ICVT 391
- MCVT 45
- ICVT 669K sh, better
- MCVT 15.4K sh
- ICVT $104.16
- MCVT $27.28
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | ICVT | MCVT |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | A88Higher | F20 |
| Mission | A100 | |
| Risk | C46 | A75Higher |
| Tradability | A74Higher | B60 |
| Holdings | A92Higher | B56 |
| Durability | A87Higher | F21 |
Rank among Convertible Bond funds
Same Category. ICVT and MCVT are both graded against the same 7 Convertible Bond funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
ICVTA
MCVTC
In short
ICVT Convertible bonds are corporate debt with a stock option attached. ICVT owns the plain-vanilla slice (cash-pay bonds, big issues only) by index, at 0.20% a year, the lowest fee among the handful of convertible ETFs on the market.
MCVT Convertibles handled by bond people, not stock people: Wellesley, a convertibles-only shop since 1991, hunts converts with put provisions, short maturities and issuer principal guarantees. Active where most rivals just index.
Stated mandate
ICVT The fund seeks to track an index of U.S. dollar-denominated convertible bonds with issue sizes above $250 million.
MCVT The fund seeks to maximize total return while limiting volatility and preserving principal. Its strategy uses convertible securities to combine income potential with capital appreciation.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
ICVT vs MCVT Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
ICVT vs MCVT Cost
Overpaying MCVT vs ICVT
$12,044
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
ICVT 0.20%
$4,155
MCVT 0.85%
$16,199
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | ICVT | MCVT | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $365 | $1,508 | $1,143 |
| 20 | $1,421 | $5,706 | $4,285 |
| 30 | $4,155 | $16,199 | $12,044 |
- 0.20%ICVT, cheaper
- 0.85%MCVT
- Middle half of Convertible Bond funds
- Median 0.69%
ICVT cheapest of 7 funds
MCVT 6th cheapest of 7 funds
ICVT vs MCVT Dividends
- ICVT 1.63%
- MCVT
- ICVT $1.64
- MCVT
- ICVT $0.15
- MCVT $0.02
- ICVT Nov 2, 2026
- MCVT Sep 15, 2026
- ICVT Nov 5, 2026
- MCVT Sep 21, 2026
- ICVT Monthly
- MCVT Quarterly
Distribution history
ICVT vs MCVT Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- ICVT 13.4%MCVT
- Return per unit of risk
- ICVT 0.87MCVT
- Worst fall
- ICVT −29.8%MCVT
- Market sensitivity
- ICVT 1.06MCVT 0.38
Popular comparisons
- 0.20% · 0.40%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.85% · 0.40%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.20% · 0.69%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.85% · 0.69%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.20% · 0.65%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.85% · 0.65%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.