ACWV ranks 2nd and FYLD 11th of 15 funds in the International Factor Index Category.
ACWV vs FYLD
ACWV −0.39pt a year
0.20%0.59%
ACWV 1.4×the volume
92.7K65K
FYLD +3.5pt
+8.2%+11.7%
ACWV vs FYLD Performance
+36.1%+84.0%
- ACWV 0.20%, better
- FYLD 0.59%
- ACWV $3.42B
- FYLD $737M
- ACWV +11.7%
- FYLD +30.1%, better
- ACWV 1.82%
- FYLD 2.91%, better
- ACWV 406
- FYLD 107
- ACWV 92.7K sh, better
- FYLD 65K sh
- ACWV $128.39
- FYLD $38.71
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | ACWV | FYLD |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | A89Higher | F14 |
| Mission | D30 | A80Higher |
| Risk | A73Higher | A70 |
| Tradability | A83Higher | D36 |
| Holdings | A76Higher | B68 |
| Durability | A77Higher | B60 |
Rank among International Factor Index funds
Same Category. ACWV and FYLD are both graded against the same 15 International Factor Index funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
ACWVB
FYLDC
In short
ACWV Global min vol in one ticker: an optimizer sifts the MSCI ACWI universe, developed and emerging, for the lowest-risk mix of roughly 400 stocks. Same playbook since 2011, at 0.20% a year.
FYLD Most international income funds stop at dividends. FYLD screens developed-market companies returning cash three ways: dividends, share buybacks and debt paydown, then leans toward the cheap ones.
Stated mandate
ACWV The fund seeks to track an index of developed and emerging market equities that collectively exhibit lower volatility than the broader developed and emerging equity markets.
FYLD The fund targets international companies that return cash to investors through dividends, share buybacks, and debt reduction, collectively described as shareholder yield.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
ACWV vs FYLD Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
ACWV vs FYLD Cost
Overpaying FYLD vs ACWV
$7,480
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
ACWV 0.20%
$4,155
FYLD 0.59%
$11,635
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | ACWV | FYLD | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $365 | $1,058 | $693 |
| 20 | $1,421 | $4,051 | $2,630 |
| 30 | $4,155 | $11,635 | $7,480 |
- 0.20%ACWV, cheaper
- 0.59%FYLD
- Middle half of International Factor Index funds
- Median 0.34%
ACWV 2nd cheapest of 15 funds
FYLD 13th cheapest of 15 funds
ACWV vs FYLD Dividends
- ACWV 1.82%
- FYLD 2.91%, better
- ACWV $2.36
- FYLD $1.15
- ACWV $1.07
- FYLD $0.26
- ACWV Jun 15, 2026
- FYLD Sep 18, 2026
- ACWV Jun 18, 2026
- FYLD Sep 21, 2026
- ACWV Twice a year
- FYLD Quarterly
Distribution history
ACWV vs FYLD Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
- ACWV
- FYLD
Risk facts
- Volatility
- ACWV 8.7%, betterFYLD 11.4%
- Return per unit of risk
- ACWV 1.03FYLD 1.60, better
- Worst fall
- ACWV −18.1%, betterFYLD −25.1%
- Market sensitivity
- ACWV 0.47FYLD 0.63
Popular comparisons
- 0.20% · 0.20%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.59% · 0.20%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.20% · 0.25%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.59% · 0.25%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.20% · 0.25%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.59% · 0.25%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.