EFAV ranks 1st and FYLD 11th of 15 funds in the International Factor Index Category.
EFAV vs FYLD
EFAV −0.39pt a year
0.20%0.59%
EFAV 8.1×the volume
526K65K
FYLD +4.3pt
+7.4%+11.7%
EFAV vs FYLD Performance
+44.6%+84.0%
- EFAV 0.20%, better
- FYLD 0.59%
- EFAV $5.53B
- FYLD $737M
- EFAV +17.1%
- FYLD +30.1%, better
- EFAV 2.95%, better
- FYLD 2.91%
- EFAV 283
- FYLD 107
- EFAV 526K sh, better
- FYLD 65K sh
- EFAV $95.04
- FYLD $38.71
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | EFAV | FYLD |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | A89Higher | F14 |
| Mission | B57 | A80Higher |
| Risk | A78Higher | A70 |
| Tradability | A87Higher | D36 |
| Holdings | B69Higher | B68 |
| Durability | A84Higher | B60 |
Rank among International Factor Index funds
Same Category. EFAV and FYLD are both graded against the same 15 International Factor Index funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
EFAVA
FYLDC
In short
EFAV The 2011 original for overseas min vol: roughly 300 developed-market stocks outside the US and Canada, picked for lower-volatility traits, at 0.20% a year. One of the strongest builds in its international factor group.
FYLD Most international income funds stop at dividends. FYLD screens developed-market companies returning cash three ways: dividends, share buybacks and debt paydown, then leans toward the cheap ones.
Stated mandate
EFAV The fund seeks to track an index of developed-market equities outside the United States and Canada that have lower-volatility characteristics.
FYLD The fund targets international companies that return cash to investors through dividends, share buybacks, and debt reduction, collectively described as shareholder yield.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
EFAV vs FYLD Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
EFAV vs FYLD Cost
Overpaying FYLD vs EFAV
$7,480
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
EFAV 0.20%
$4,155
FYLD 0.59%
$11,635
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | EFAV | FYLD | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $365 | $1,058 | $693 |
| 20 | $1,421 | $4,051 | $2,630 |
| 30 | $4,155 | $11,635 | $7,480 |
- 0.20%EFAV, cheaper
- 0.59%FYLD
- Middle half of International Factor Index funds
- Median 0.34%
EFAV 2nd cheapest of 15 funds
FYLD 13th cheapest of 15 funds
EFAV vs FYLD Dividends
- EFAV 2.95%, better
- FYLD 2.91%
- EFAV $2.86
- FYLD $1.15
- EFAV $1.68
- FYLD $0.26
- EFAV Jun 15, 2026
- FYLD Sep 18, 2026
- EFAV Jun 18, 2026
- FYLD Sep 21, 2026
- EFAV Twice a year
- FYLD Quarterly
Distribution history
EFAV vs FYLD Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
- EFAV
- FYLD
Risk facts
- Volatility
- EFAV 10.5%, betterFYLD 11.4%
- Return per unit of risk
- EFAV 1.24FYLD 1.60, better
- Worst fall
- EFAV −25.7%FYLD −25.1%, better
- Market sensitivity
- EFAV 0.47FYLD 0.63
EFAV and FYLD in the news
Popular comparisons
- 0.20% · 0.20%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.59% · 0.20%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.20% · 0.25%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.59% · 0.25%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.20% · 0.25%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.59% · 0.25%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
