ACWV ranks 2nd and GMOI 9th of 15 funds in the International Factor Index Category.
ACWV vs GMOI
ACWV −0.40pt a year
0.20%0.60%
GMOI 1.1×the volume
93.5K98.4K
ACWV vs GMOI Performance
+11.7%+30.6%
- ACWV 0.20%, better
- GMOI 0.60%
- ACWV $3.44B
- GMOI $694M
- ACWV +11.7%
- GMOI +30.6%, better
- ACWV 1.83%, better
- GMOI 1.24%
- ACWV 407
- GMOI 173
- ACWV 93.5K sh
- GMOI 98.4K sh, better
- ACWV $129.38
- GMOI $40.25
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | ACWV | GMOI |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | A89Higher | F7 |
| Mission | D25 | A75Higher |
| Risk | A77 | A81Higher |
| Tradability | A83Higher | C54 |
| Holdings | A76 | A100Higher |
| Durability | A76Higher | D30 |
Rank among International Factor Index funds
Same Category. ACWV and GMOI are both graded against the same 15 International Factor Index funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
ACWVB
GMOIC
In short
ACWV Global min vol in one ticker: an optimizer sifts the MSCI ACWI universe, developed and emerging, for the lowest-risk mix of roughly 400 stocks. Same playbook since 2011, at 0.20% a year.
GMOI GMO made its name running valuation-driven money for institutions. GMOI is that machinery in an ETF wrapper: an active portfolio of the international stocks GMO's own models read as deepest value, not the ones an index labels that way.
Stated mandate
ACWV The fund seeks to track an index of developed and emerging market equities that collectively exhibit lower volatility than the broader developed and emerging equity markets.
GMOI The Fund seeks total return.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
ACWV vs GMOI Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
ACWV vs GMOI Cost
Overpaying GMOI vs ACWV
$7,662
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
ACWV 0.20%
$4,155
GMOI 0.60%
$11,817
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | ACWV | GMOI | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $365 | $1,076 | $711 |
| 20 | $1,421 | $4,116 | $2,695 |
| 30 | $4,155 | $11,817 | $7,662 |
- 0.20%ACWV, cheaper
- 0.60%GMOI
- Middle half of International Factor Index funds
- Median 0.34%
ACWV 2nd cheapest of 15 funds
GMOI 14th cheapest of 15 funds
ACWV vs GMOI Dividends
- ACWV 1.83%, better
- GMOI 1.24%
- ACWV $2.36
- GMOI $0.50
- ACWV $1.07
- GMOI $0.15
- ACWV Jun 15, 2026
- GMOI Jun 30, 2026
- ACWV Jun 18, 2026
- GMOI Jul 1, 2026
- ACWV Twice a year
- GMOI Twice a year
Distribution history
ACWV vs GMOI Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- ACWV 8.7%GMOI 11.3%
- Return per unit of risk
- ACWV 1.03GMOI 2.06
- Worst fall
- ACWV −18.1%GMOI −14.7%
- Market sensitivity
- ACWV 0.53GMOI 0.18
Popular comparisons
- 0.20% · 0.20%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.60% · 0.20%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.20% · 0.25%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.60% · 0.25%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.20% · 0.34%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.60% · 0.34%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.