ACWV ranks 2nd and IPKW 12th of 15 funds in the International Factor Index Category.
ACWV vs IPKW
ACWV −0.35pt a year
0.20%0.55%
ACWV 2.1×the volume
93.5K44.2K
IPKW +3.4pt
+8.1%+11.5%
ACWV vs IPKW Performance
+36.6%+71.4%
- ACWV 0.20%, better
- IPKW 0.55%
- ACWV $3.44B
- IPKW $571M
- ACWV +11.7%
- IPKW +18.0%, better
- ACWV 1.83%
- IPKW 3.35%, better
- ACWV 407
- IPKW 177
- ACWV 93.5K sh, better
- IPKW 44.2K sh
- ACWV $129.38
- IPKW $59.80
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | ACWV | IPKW |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | A89Higher | D25 |
| Mission | D25 | |
| Risk | A77Higher | C50 |
| Tradability | A83Higher | B65 |
| Holdings | A76Higher | D27 |
| Durability | A76Higher | B55 |
Rank among International Factor Index funds
Same Category. ACWV and IPKW are both graded against the same 15 International Factor Index funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
ACWVB
IPKWC
In short
ACWV Global min vol in one ticker: an optimizer sifts the MSCI ACWI universe, developed and emerging, for the lowest-risk mix of roughly 400 stocks. Same playbook since 2011, at 0.20% a year.
IPKW Buybacks are an American obsession. IPKW exports the screen: non-US companies that actually shrank their share count by 5% or more in their latest fiscal year, roughly 160 of them, in one ticker.
Stated mandate
ACWV The fund seeks to track an index of developed and emerging market equities that collectively exhibit lower volatility than the broader developed and emerging equity markets.
IPKW The fund tracks an index of common stocks of foreign companies that satisfy the requirements for classification as BuyBack AchieversTM.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
ACWV vs IPKW Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
ACWV vs IPKW Cost
Overpaying IPKW vs ACWV
$6,749
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
ACWV 0.20%
$4,155
IPKW 0.55%
$10,904
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | ACWV | IPKW | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $365 | $988 | $623 |
| 20 | $1,421 | $3,790 | $2,369 |
| 30 | $4,155 | $10,904 | $6,749 |
- 0.20%ACWV, cheaper
- 0.55%IPKW
- Middle half of International Factor Index funds
- Median 0.34%
ACWV 2nd cheapest of 15 funds
IPKW 11th cheapest of 15 funds
ACWV vs IPKW Dividends
- ACWV 1.83%
- IPKW 3.35%, better
- ACWV $2.36
- IPKW $2.00
- ACWV $1.07
- IPKW $0.25
- ACWV Jun 15, 2026
- IPKW Sep 21, 2026
- ACWV Jun 18, 2026
- IPKW Sep 25, 2026
- ACWV Twice a year
- IPKW Quarterly
Distribution history
ACWV vs IPKW Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
- ACWV
- IPKW
Risk facts
- Volatility
- ACWV 8.7%, betterIPKW 12.1%
- Return per unit of risk
- ACWV 1.03IPKW 1.61, better
- Worst fall
- ACWV −18.1%, betterIPKW −29.6%
- Market sensitivity
- ACWV 0.53IPKW 0.65
Popular comparisons
- 0.20% · 0.20%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.55% · 0.20%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.20% · 0.25%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.55% · 0.25%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.20% · 0.34%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.55% · 0.34%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.