EFAV ranks 1st and IPKW 12th of 15 funds in the International Factor Index Category.
EFAV vs IPKW
EFAV −0.35pt a year
0.20%0.55%
EFAV 11.5×the volume
510K44.2K
IPKW +4.2pt
+7.3%+11.5%
EFAV vs IPKW Performance
+45.5%+71.4%
- EFAV 0.20%, better
- IPKW 0.55%
- EFAV $5.53B
- IPKW $571M
- EFAV +17.8%
- IPKW +18.0%, better
- EFAV 2.97%
- IPKW 3.35%, better
- EFAV 283
- IPKW 177
- EFAV 510K sh, better
- IPKW 44.2K sh
- EFAV $96.22
- IPKW $59.80
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | EFAV | IPKW |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | A89Higher | D25 |
| Mission | B56 | |
| Risk | A75Higher | C50 |
| Tradability | A84Higher | B65 |
| Holdings | B69Higher | D27 |
| Durability | A83Higher | B55 |
Rank among International Factor Index funds
Same Category. EFAV and IPKW are both graded against the same 15 International Factor Index funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
EFAVA
IPKWC
In short
EFAV The 2011 original for overseas min vol: roughly 300 developed-market stocks outside the US and Canada, picked for lower-volatility traits, at 0.20% a year. One of the strongest builds in its international factor group.
IPKW Buybacks are an American obsession. IPKW exports the screen: non-US companies that actually shrank their share count by 5% or more in their latest fiscal year, roughly 160 of them, in one ticker.
Stated mandate
EFAV The fund seeks to track an index of developed-market equities outside the United States and Canada that have lower-volatility characteristics.
IPKW The fund tracks an index of common stocks of foreign companies that satisfy the requirements for classification as BuyBack AchieversTM.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
EFAV vs IPKW Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
EFAV vs IPKW Cost
Overpaying IPKW vs EFAV
$6,749
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
EFAV 0.20%
$4,155
IPKW 0.55%
$10,904
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | EFAV | IPKW | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $365 | $988 | $623 |
| 20 | $1,421 | $3,790 | $2,369 |
| 30 | $4,155 | $10,904 | $6,749 |
- 0.20%EFAV, cheaper
- 0.55%IPKW
- Middle half of International Factor Index funds
- Median 0.34%
EFAV 2nd cheapest of 15 funds
IPKW 11th cheapest of 15 funds
EFAV vs IPKW Dividends
- EFAV 2.97%
- IPKW 3.35%, better
- EFAV $2.86
- IPKW $2.00
- EFAV $1.68
- IPKW $0.25
- EFAV Jun 15, 2026
- IPKW Sep 21, 2026
- EFAV Jun 18, 2026
- IPKW Sep 25, 2026
- EFAV Twice a year
- IPKW Quarterly
Distribution history
EFAV vs IPKW Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
- EFAV
- IPKW
Risk facts
- Volatility
- EFAV 10.5%, betterIPKW 12.1%
- Return per unit of risk
- EFAV 1.24IPKW 1.61, better
- Worst fall
- EFAV −26.0%, betterIPKW −29.6%
- Market sensitivity
- EFAV 0.48IPKW 0.65
EFAV and IPKW in the news
Popular comparisons
- 0.20% · 0.20%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.55% · 0.20%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.20% · 0.25%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.55% · 0.25%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.20% · 0.34%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.55% · 0.34%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
