Skip to content

ACWV vs PATN

iShares MSCI Global Min Vol Factor ETF

ACWVBCboe

Pacer Nasdaq International Patent Leaders ETF

PATNFNasdaq

Overlap

Expense ratio

ACWV −0.45pt a year

ACWV0.20%PATN0.65%

Avg volume · 30D

PATN 1.5×the volume

ACWV92.7KPATN139K

ACWV vs PATN Performance

Nov 7, 2025 – Nov 9, 2026

+11.7%ACWV+24.8%PATN

Nov 7, 2025 to Nov 9, 2026. ACWV +11.7%. PATN +24.8%. Use the arrow keys to read each point.0%40%Nov 2025May 2026Nov 2026
Expense ratio
ACWV 0.20%, better
PATN 0.65%
Fund size
ACWV $3.42B
PATN $366M
1Y total return
ACWV +11.7%
PATN +24.8%, better
Yield (12M)
ACWV 1.82%
PATN 1.92%, better
Holdings
ACWV 406
PATN 106
Avg volume (30D)
ACWV 92.7K sh
PATN 139K sh, better
NAV per share
ACWV $128.39
PATN $31.25
52W range

ETF.net Grade

ACWV: Cost 89, Risk 73, Mission 30, Tradability 83, Holdings 76, Durability 77. PATN: Cost 0, Risk 19, Mission not scored, Tradability 41, Holdings 24, Durability 27.
Pillar letters and Scores for ACWV, PATN, with each pillar’s weight
PillarACWVPATN
Cost30% weightA89HigherF0
Mission25% weightD30Not scored
Risk15% weightA73HigherF19
Tradability15% weightA83HigherC41
Holdings10% weightA76HigherF24
Durability5% weightA77HigherD27

Rank among International Factor Index funds

Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

Same Category. ACWV and PATN are both graded against the same 15 International Factor Index funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

International Factor Index⁠

Category · 15 funds
See all 15 ›

ACWV ranks 2nd and PATN 15th of 15 funds in the International Factor Index Category.

  1. Rank 1AEFAViShares MSCI EAFE Min Vol Factor ETFScore 76
  2. Rank 2BACWViShares MSCI Global Min Vol Factor ETFScore 68
  3. Rank 3BIDLVInvesco S&P International Developed Low Volatility ETFScore 66
  4. Rank 14DGRINVictoryShares International Free Cash Flow Growth ETFScore 36
  5. Rank 15FPATNPacer Nasdaq International Patent Leaders ETFScore 17

Our read on each fund

ETF.net Research

ACWVBiShares MSCI Global Min Vol Factor ETF

PATNFPacer Nasdaq International Patent Leaders ETF

In short

ACWV Global min vol in one ticker: an optimizer sifts the MSCI ACWI universe, developed and emerging, for the lowest-risk mix of roughly 400 stocks. Same playbook since 2011, at 0.20% a year.

PATN Most international funds sort companies by size, value or momentum. PATN sorts by patents, tracking a Nasdaq index that ranks large and mid cap non-US firms on what their patent portfolios are worth and holds the top 100.

Stated mandate

ACWV The fund seeks to track an index of developed and emerging market equities that collectively exhibit lower volatility than the broader developed and emerging equity markets.

PATN The fund seeks international growth by tracking the 100 highest-ranked companies by patent valuation from a universe of large- and mid-cap non-U.S. companies.

Why people hold it

  • ACWV 0.20% a year for a globally optimized factor build, well under the 0.41% median for international factor ETFs.
  • Not a simple low-vol screen. The index optimizes the MSCI ACWI for the lowest absolute risk within a set of constraints, so how stocks move together shapes the weights.msci.com
  • One ticker for the whole map. The developed-only sibling EFAV charges the same 0.20%; ACWV folds emerging markets into the same wrapper.
  • Running since 2011 with billions in assets, it sits among the stronger implementations in its international factor peer group.
  • PATN The selection rule is genuinely unusual: a Nasdaq index scores non-US large and mid caps on patent valuation and keeps the top 100, so the portfolio is built around intellectual property rather than price or market cap.paceretfs.com
  • Rules-based and spread wide: roughly 100 developed-market names outside the US, chosen and refreshed by index rule instead of a manager's judgment call.
  • An R&D tilt without the usual US tech concentration: the whole universe is non-US, so it reaches the innovators that most American-listed innovation funds skip. Distributions are paid quarterly.

Worth knowing

  • ACWV Minimum volatility is the aim, not a floor. iShares states the fund may experience more than minimum volatility, with no guarantee the index strategy lowers it.ishares.com
  • Emerging markets ride along inside this defensive build, bringing the political and economic swings iShares flags as heightened in those markets.ishares.com
  • By design it leans away from the cap-weighted world index, so its country and sector mix can look quite different and its path can diverge in either direction.msci.com
  • PATN You pay up for the idea. The 0.65% expense ratio sits meaningfully above what a typical international factor fund charges, and that gap compounds against you every year you hold it.
  • It launched in 2024, so there is not yet a long record showing how a patent-value screen behaves through a full market cycle or a growth-stock drawdown.
  • Cheaper, longer-established international factor funds (EFAV at 0.20%, IDMO at 0.25%) currently sit well ahead of it in our peer group review.

Full ACWV profile⁠

Full PATN profile⁠

ACWV vs PATN Holdings

How we measure overlap

Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.

ACWV vs PATN Cost

Overpaying PATN vs ACWV

$8,562

On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.

  • ACWV 0.20%

    $4,155

  • PATN 0.65%

    $12,717

$10,000
30 years

Cost over time

  • ACWV 0.20%
  • PATN 0.65%
  • Overpaying
One line per fund, from year 0 to year 30. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$5K$10K$15K051015202530PATN $12,717ACWV $4,155

Year by year

YearACWVPATNOverpaying
10$365$1,163$798
20$1,421$4,440$3,019
30$4,155$12,717$8,562

Expense ratio

  • 0.20%ACWV, cheaper
  • 0.65%PATN
  • Middle half of International Factor Index funds
  • Median 0.34%

ACWV 2nd cheapest of 15 funds

PATN 15th cheapest of 15 funds

ACWV vs PATN Dividends

Last 12 months to Nov 9, 2026
Yield (12M)
ACWV 1.82%
PATN 1.92%, better
Payout (12M)
ACWV $2.36
PATN $0.63
Last payment
ACWV $1.07
PATN $0.05
Ex-dividend
ACWV Jun 15, 2026
PATN Sep 3, 2026
Paid on
ACWV Jun 18, 2026
PATN Sep 8, 2026
Frequency
ACWV Twice a year
PATN Quarterly

Distribution history

Per share, 2017 to 2026, same scale for both

ACWVTwice a year · 19 paymentsAll ACWV payments⁠
One bar per payment. 19 payments from 2017 to 2026 YTD. Jun 20, 2017 $0.85; Dec 19, 2017 $0.87; Jun 19, 2018 $0.90; Dec 18, 2018 $0.99; Jun 17, 2019 $1.02; Dec 16, 2019 $1.41; Jun 15, 2020 $0.92; Dec 14, 2020 $0.79; Jun 10, 2021 $0.95; Dec 13, 2021 $1.13; Jun 9, 2022 $0.87; Dec 13, 2022 $1.20; Jun 7, 2023 $0.87; Dec 20, 2023 $1.55; Jun 11, 2024 $0.91; Dec 17, 2024 $1.63; Jun 16, 2025 $1.18; Dec 16, 2025 $1.30; Jun 15, 2026 $1.07. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$12017202020232026YTD
PATNQuarterly · 6 paymentsAll PATN payments⁠
One bar per payment. 6 payments from 2017 to 2026 YTD. Dec 27, 2024 $0.06; Jun 5, 2025 $0.07; Sep 4, 2025 $0.0093; Dec 30, 2025 $0.53; Jun 4, 2026 $0.05; Sep 3, 2026 $0.05. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$12017202020232026YTD

ACWV vs PATN Risk

Fall from peak · 5 years

This chart needs five years of history for both funds.

Risk facts

VolatilityStd dev, 3 years
ACWV 8.7%PATN 21.7%since Oct 2024
Return per unit of riskSharpe ratio, 3 years
ACWV 1.03PATN 0.94since Oct 2024
Worst fallMax drawdown, 5 years
ACWV −18.1%PATN −18.5%since Sep 2024
Market sensitivityBeta, 5 years
ACWV 0.47PATN 0.94

Popular comparisons

  • ACWVBvsEFAVA

    iShares MSCI Global Min Vol Factor ETF · iShares MSCI EAFE Min Vol Factor ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.20% · 0.20%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • PATNFvsEFAVA

    Pacer Nasdaq International Patent Leaders ETF · iShares MSCI EAFE Min Vol Factor ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.65% · 0.20%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • ACWVBvsIDLVB

    iShares MSCI Global Min Vol Factor ETF · Invesco S&P International Developed Low Volatility ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.20% · 0.25%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • PATNFvsIDLVB

    Pacer Nasdaq International Patent Leaders ETF · Invesco S&P International Developed Low Volatility ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.65% · 0.25%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • ACWVBvsIDMOB

    iShares MSCI Global Min Vol Factor ETF · Invesco S&P International Developed Momentum ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.20% · 0.25%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • PATNFvsIDMOB

    Pacer Nasdaq International Patent Leaders ETF · Invesco S&P International Developed Momentum ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.65% · 0.25%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.