ACWV ranks 2nd and PATN 15th of 15 funds in the International Factor Index Category.
ACWV vs PATN
ACWV −0.45pt a year
0.20%0.65%
PATN 1.5×the volume
92.7K139K
ACWV vs PATN Performance
+11.7%+24.8%
- ACWV 0.20%, better
- PATN 0.65%
- ACWV $3.42B
- PATN $366M
- ACWV +11.7%
- PATN +24.8%, better
- ACWV 1.82%
- PATN 1.92%, better
- ACWV 406
- PATN 106
- ACWV 92.7K sh
- PATN 139K sh, better
- ACWV $128.39
- PATN $31.25
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | ACWV | PATN |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | A89Higher | F0 |
| Mission | D30 | |
| Risk | A73Higher | F19 |
| Tradability | A83Higher | C41 |
| Holdings | A76Higher | F24 |
| Durability | A77Higher | D27 |
Rank among International Factor Index funds
Same Category. ACWV and PATN are both graded against the same 15 International Factor Index funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
ACWVB
PATNF
In short
ACWV Global min vol in one ticker: an optimizer sifts the MSCI ACWI universe, developed and emerging, for the lowest-risk mix of roughly 400 stocks. Same playbook since 2011, at 0.20% a year.
PATN Most international funds sort companies by size, value or momentum. PATN sorts by patents, tracking a Nasdaq index that ranks large and mid cap non-US firms on what their patent portfolios are worth and holds the top 100.
Stated mandate
ACWV The fund seeks to track an index of developed and emerging market equities that collectively exhibit lower volatility than the broader developed and emerging equity markets.
PATN The fund seeks international growth by tracking the 100 highest-ranked companies by patent valuation from a universe of large- and mid-cap non-U.S. companies.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
ACWV vs PATN Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
ACWV vs PATN Cost
Overpaying PATN vs ACWV
$8,562
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
ACWV 0.20%
$4,155
PATN 0.65%
$12,717
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | ACWV | PATN | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $365 | $1,163 | $798 |
| 20 | $1,421 | $4,440 | $3,019 |
| 30 | $4,155 | $12,717 | $8,562 |
- 0.20%ACWV, cheaper
- 0.65%PATN
- Middle half of International Factor Index funds
- Median 0.34%
ACWV 2nd cheapest of 15 funds
PATN 15th cheapest of 15 funds
ACWV vs PATN Dividends
- ACWV 1.82%
- PATN 1.92%, better
- ACWV $2.36
- PATN $0.63
- ACWV $1.07
- PATN $0.05
- ACWV Jun 15, 2026
- PATN Sep 3, 2026
- ACWV Jun 18, 2026
- PATN Sep 8, 2026
- ACWV Twice a year
- PATN Quarterly
Distribution history
ACWV vs PATN Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- ACWV 8.7%PATN 21.7%
- Return per unit of risk
- ACWV 1.03PATN 0.94
- Worst fall
- ACWV −18.1%PATN −18.5%
- Market sensitivity
- ACWV 0.47PATN 0.94
Popular comparisons
- 0.20% · 0.20%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.65% · 0.20%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.20% · 0.25%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.65% · 0.25%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.20% · 0.25%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.65% · 0.25%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.