EFAV ranks 1st and PATN 15th of 15 funds in the International Factor Index Category.
EFAV vs PATN
EFAV −0.45pt a year
0.20%0.65%
EFAV 3.8×the volume
526K139K
EFAV vs PATN Performance
+17.1%+24.8%
- EFAV 0.20%, better
- PATN 0.65%
- EFAV $5.53B
- PATN $366M
- EFAV +17.1%
- PATN +24.8%, better
- EFAV 2.95%, better
- PATN 1.92%
- EFAV 283
- PATN 106
- EFAV 526K sh, better
- PATN 139K sh
- EFAV $95.04
- PATN $31.25
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | EFAV | PATN |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | A89Higher | F0 |
| Mission | B57 | |
| Risk | A78Higher | F19 |
| Tradability | A87Higher | C41 |
| Holdings | B69Higher | F24 |
| Durability | A84Higher | D27 |
Rank among International Factor Index funds
Same Category. EFAV and PATN are both graded against the same 15 International Factor Index funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
EFAVA
PATNF
In short
EFAV The 2011 original for overseas min vol: roughly 300 developed-market stocks outside the US and Canada, picked for lower-volatility traits, at 0.20% a year. One of the strongest builds in its international factor group.
PATN Most international funds sort companies by size, value or momentum. PATN sorts by patents, tracking a Nasdaq index that ranks large and mid cap non-US firms on what their patent portfolios are worth and holds the top 100.
Stated mandate
EFAV The fund seeks to track an index of developed-market equities outside the United States and Canada that have lower-volatility characteristics.
PATN The fund seeks international growth by tracking the 100 highest-ranked companies by patent valuation from a universe of large- and mid-cap non-U.S. companies.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
EFAV vs PATN Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
EFAV vs PATN Cost
Overpaying PATN vs EFAV
$8,562
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
EFAV 0.20%
$4,155
PATN 0.65%
$12,717
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | EFAV | PATN | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $365 | $1,163 | $798 |
| 20 | $1,421 | $4,440 | $3,019 |
| 30 | $4,155 | $12,717 | $8,562 |
- 0.20%EFAV, cheaper
- 0.65%PATN
- Middle half of International Factor Index funds
- Median 0.34%
EFAV 2nd cheapest of 15 funds
PATN 15th cheapest of 15 funds
EFAV vs PATN Dividends
- EFAV 2.95%, better
- PATN 1.92%
- EFAV $2.86
- PATN $0.63
- EFAV $1.68
- PATN $0.05
- EFAV Jun 15, 2026
- PATN Sep 3, 2026
- EFAV Jun 18, 2026
- PATN Sep 8, 2026
- EFAV Twice a year
- PATN Quarterly
Distribution history
EFAV vs PATN Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- EFAV 10.5%PATN 21.7%
- Return per unit of risk
- EFAV 1.24PATN 0.94
- Worst fall
- EFAV −25.7%PATN −18.5%
- Market sensitivity
- EFAV 0.47PATN 0.94
EFAV and PATN in the news
Popular comparisons
- 0.20% · 0.20%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.65% · 0.20%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.20% · 0.25%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.65% · 0.25%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.20% · 0.25%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.65% · 0.25%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
